Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Record Drop In Home Prices
Washington Post ^ | October 26, 2006 | Kirstin Downey

Posted on 10/26/2006 12:53:25 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts

The price of existing homes last month fell 2.2 percent, the largest monthly decline in the almost four decades the number has been tracked, according to an industry report released yesterday.

Nationwide, the number of existing single-family homes sold fell 14.2 percent in September compared with September 2005, according to the report from the National Association of Realtors. The number of sales has fallen each month since March.

Prices fell everywhere in the country, with the Northeast and West most affected. Declines were more moderate in the South, which includes the Washington area....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bubble; bubblebrigade; depression; despair; doom; frbubbleheads; gggsalesman; goldsalesman; miserytonight; realestate; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-346 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
Go to page 110 of the link and see how much of household net worth appreciation is tied to real estate.

You're the one who made the real estate claim, you get the data and post it, if it proves your point.

Still waiting for you to post any data which backs up your gold stock dividend claim. Or was that another made up "fact" that you'll never admit you made up?

Let's recap, shall we?

A very large portion of household net worth appreciation is a function of real estate appreciation.

Unless you have a unique definition of "very large portion"?

141 posted on 10/27/2006 7:18:08 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Here you go Toddler. What's your take on the following chart?


142 posted on 10/27/2006 7:23:17 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
What's your take on the following chart?

Thanks, GoldGunsGuts, it's nice to see a real chart from you for a change. My take is that if we "Take away real estate appreciation", it looks like Household Net Worth would have still increased in 2003,2004,2005 and 2006. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? Or did you just misspeak?

143 posted on 10/27/2006 7:56:06 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
The humor relief here is YOU; pet, though growing stale through your maniac repetitious tendency.
144 posted on 10/27/2006 8:17:40 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

You will be dead and gone, many several 100 years, before that ever happens; if it ever does.


145 posted on 10/27/2006 8:18:58 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

This is the wrong site to obtain intelligent commentary on finance and investments. JMO.


146 posted on 10/27/2006 8:19:27 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Mase

bttt


147 posted on 10/27/2006 8:23:23 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mase

bttt


148 posted on 10/27/2006 8:23:59 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Mase

LOL.....I doubt he's ever even heard of Wharton! :-)


149 posted on 10/27/2006 8:25:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Torie
That's because of the goldbuggers and the perpetual doom&gloomers.

OTOH, there are often nuggets of financial wisdom, buried in some of these threads. :-)

150 posted on 10/27/2006 8:33:12 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Too much work to ferret them out. But then, I am quite satisfied with my own ability to handle these matters. :)


151 posted on 10/27/2006 8:35:55 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Go to page 110 of the link and see how much of household net worth appreciation is tied to real estate.

Since you won't (can't) do it I'll do it for you. As of the second quarter of 2006, Americans had $10.982 trillion equity in household real estate. As of the second quarter of 2006, Americans had $53.325 trillion in household net worth. That means our homeowner equity accounts for just 20.6% of our total net worth. That leaves us with a lot of liquid assets.

Now why does that scare you and mean we're doomed? More importantly, why does that mean gold is going to $1650 an ounce?

152 posted on 10/27/2006 8:38:23 PM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Did you manage to take a look at post #142?


153 posted on 10/27/2006 8:47:28 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
actually, the homes in the tech heavy and post WW2 population boom states (like the northeast and CA) will see their baby boomers move to their retirement home. The tech heavy areas will see a slump in sales as the job market for folks in the first 5 years of their career watch as their jobs get shipped offshore. That will leave many, many homes on the market... with a potential drop if other buyers see prices dropping to far (don't want to get upside down).

meanwhile, the southern states (texas, florida, NM, GA) will see an influx of the retirees... pushing home values up while driving new home building.

154 posted on 10/27/2006 8:48:33 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The chart is meaningless, unless one knows what is in one's portfolio as a whole. The chart is also about "change," ie the delta function, rather than absolute net worth from various categories of assets, which of course accentuates modest changes in values vis a vis the delta function. I own a boat load of real estate with little leverage. The changes to date in my absolute net worth are relatively small. Cheers.


155 posted on 10/27/2006 8:59:22 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Yes, it is. Stick with what you do, if you're happy with it. :-)


156 posted on 10/27/2006 9:07:15 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
Oil Price Dropped Again;

Something weird happened here in Jacksonville, Alabama yesterday afternoon. All the gas stations suddenly raised prices on average about 8 cents. Today, a couple dropped them back down, but most are still up the 8 or so cents. Don't understand the danged gas/oil pricing thing at all.

157 posted on 10/27/2006 9:09:57 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Just call Me a Rush Limbaugh type of conservative. I ain't cutting and running! VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sten

HOGWASH !

Manhattan real estate prices aren't falling and while there has been a tiny slow down ( okay, so houses and co-ops and condos aren't selling in an hour of two, now it's taking a couple of weeks to maybe even two months ), that has just brought the time line back into normal range. And the Chicago real estate market hasn't slowed down either.

158 posted on 10/27/2006 9:12:33 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I'm not sure I follow you. As I understand it, the chart demonstrates that real estate appreciation accounts for 61% of gains in household net worth in 2005. And on average, real estate appreciation accounts for approx. 41% of the gains in household net worth for 03, 04 and 05. To my mind, that means if the real estate bubble pops, it will erase a huge chunk of household net wealth accumulated over the last several years. Moreover, the increase in household net worth has been declining every year since 2003. If this trend continues (and I think it will), this will most likely cause people to begin dipping into there disposable income to build up their savings.


159 posted on 10/27/2006 9:31:15 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; Torie
I'm not sure I follow you...


160 posted on 10/27/2006 9:33:04 PM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson