Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obesity drives up U.S. fuel appetite
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | October 26, 2006 | Jennifer Harper

Posted on 10/26/2006 8:26:06 AM PDT by CSM

Chubby drivers and plump passengers add to the fuel crisis in more ways than one. A fat nation needs more gas in the tank, according to research released yesterday.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; gasoline; nanystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: CSM

21 posted on 10/26/2006 8:58:34 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Thanks....when I first heard this story, I was thinking they said barrels.

Seemed a tad overboard.


22 posted on 10/26/2006 8:59:32 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Time for the Government to regulate people's diet.

Their "Food Pyramid" is partially responsible for the obesity in the first place.

23 posted on 10/26/2006 8:59:48 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CSM

First we have Hate Crimes.

Then we had thought crimes.

Now we have Public Obesity Crime!!!!!


Will they have little school kids go around and issue pretend "Fasto Violation Tickets" like they have school kids issue SUV "environmental tickets"?


24 posted on 10/26/2006 9:01:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Sounds like paradise.


25 posted on 10/26/2006 9:04:11 AM PDT by Niuhuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
SUV "environmental tickets"?

Sounds like the school scene from 1984!! The little leftist indoctrinated kid in the brownshirt uniform calling Winston a 'though criminal'.
26 posted on 10/26/2006 9:06:10 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CSM


Once again the MSM is advocating that Fat People have no reason to live...


27 posted on 10/26/2006 9:08:54 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Perhaps fascinting, but shows no concrete link between obesity and fuel usage. Simply makes an interesting observation (since 1960 weight has gone up, fuel use has gone up too). Of course fuel consumption is tied to weight of the vehicle including passengers, but that factor pales in comparison to other factors. For instance, how many women worked in 1960? Did they drive cars or did many/most families have just one car? How did changes there affect our overall consumption? what about the railroads, were they used for cargo transport more than they are now? If not, didnt trucks take over the load? etc.


28 posted on 10/26/2006 9:15:18 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Government agencies are already telling restaurants to cut portion sizes. Uh...no one holds a gun to my head to force me to eat the whole dish.


29 posted on 10/26/2006 9:22:46 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
Here's an excellent example of a waste of fuel:


30 posted on 10/26/2006 9:26:41 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

"All in all, this was an idiotic story designed to promote calls for new regulation and other leftist wet-dreams."

I agree with you and all the other posters on this thread.

The Government has added more weight to our cars than that of 4 obese passengers. In addition to the weight adds, the gov't. has placed cafe limits on vehicles, making the auto mfgs. use downgraded (thinner, less weight) materials. Therefore, effectively increasing fuel usage while making cars less safe.


31 posted on 10/26/2006 9:26:41 AM PDT by CSM (These people whine incessantly. And they want to be entrusted with the government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rwgal

"Don't you think this report is a crock of crap? "

Its a load, alright.


32 posted on 10/26/2006 9:28:15 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces
Image and video hosting by TinyPic That's it I'm putting on the tinfoil hat!
33 posted on 10/26/2006 9:29:34 AM PDT by Ab Alius Domitor ("In the end;the winner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

this is so stupid. duh. it is incredible, how in this day and age (with 24 hour news channels, newspapers, and bloggers spewing forth volumes of useless information and opinion) even the dumbest information gets equal time. i would love to see if this passes the "statistical significance" test.


34 posted on 10/26/2006 9:31:00 AM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

you're joking but one of the baggage handlers on a flight I was waiting to board recently, told me that the airline had just switched from peanuts to pretzels because it would save them so many millions a year and were understocking the food and beverages because the savings in fuel added up to millions a year. They're gambling that not everyone will want someting to eat or drink.


35 posted on 10/26/2006 9:31:23 AM PDT by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ab Alius Domitor


HAHAHHAHAHA...please take the comment as sarcasm...


36 posted on 10/26/2006 9:33:26 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

if 200lbs causes a 1 mpg drop and 20 mpg is the fleet avg., that would be a 5% drop and 20 lbs would be a 0.5% drop.

1 billion gallons is a 0.7 % drop in annual fuel economy.

So I think the article probably has their numbers about right.


37 posted on 10/26/2006 9:39:29 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
For instance, how many women worked in 1960? Did they drive cars or did many/most families have just one car? How did changes there affect our overall consumption? what about the railroads, were they used for cargo transport more than they are now? If not, didnt trucks take over the load? etc.

Done right, none of that should matter. All that matters is the additional fuel consumption attributable to the extra weight.

Given that we know the average 1960 adult weighed 24 pounds less than today's (if that's not already adjusted for average height, it needs to be), calculating the cost of 'obesity' would only consider the fuel savings we would realize if every vehicle was carrying (24 lbs * avg. number of passengers) less.

With the census and other data available, reasonable results should be within reach. It's just a matter of finding and properly applying the right data.

38 posted on 10/26/2006 9:51:06 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
shows no concrete link between obesity and fuel usage.

The laws of physics establish that link. If you put 24 pounds of potatoes in your trunk, your car will use more fuel.

39 posted on 10/26/2006 9:55:18 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark
Yep, that 3.8% weight increase is going to kill us all.


It won't kill us, but it will lead to more fuel consumption, primarily in city driving.
40 posted on 10/26/2006 9:56:46 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson