Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Terrorists Can't Get a Break in the U.S.A.
Strategypage.com ^ | 9/15/06

Posted on 10/23/2006 9:24:34 AM PDT by Valin

Why haven't there been more Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States since September 11, 2001? Just one such attack, of any magnitude, would have been hailed as a great victory for al Qaeda, and Islamic terrorists in general. Considering the large number of Moslems saying they agree with Islamic terrorism, and the thousands who have volunteered for such suicide attacks all over the world, you would have thought at least one such attack would have taken place in the U.S. since 2001. It's easy enough to obtain a gun or explosives in the United States. There are many states where it's legal to sell large firecrackers that non-Moslems have assembled into credible bombs. An explosive vest can easily be made. On the Internet there are instructions, in Arabic, for how to make a detonator. Gunpowder is easily obtained as well, and you can still buy large quantities of fertilizer, to make a really large bomb. There is still easy access to the outsides of many prominent structures. You can kill lots of people in such places and make your point. The means are there, but where are the people with the will?

Part of the reason is the 5,000 Islamic terrorists the CIA has been taken out of circulation (by death or arrest) since 2001. Even more have been taken out of circulation by other nations. The FBI has had less success inside the United States, arresting fewer than a thousand people, and successfully prosecuting about 230. But this FBI activity has apparently sent a message to potential Islamic terrorists in the United States, and scared many of them off.

Another reason is the informant network established within the Moslem-American community. For every suspected Islamic terrorist arrested in the United States, some ten Moslem-Americans have joined the military, FBI, CIA and similar organizations involved in the war on terror. While many Moslem-Americans oppose the invasion in Iraq, very few of them support Islamic terrorism. All this is not really new. Even the September 11, 2001 terrorists were warned to stay away from Arab-American communities, because of the number of people there who would call the cops if they suspected there were terrorists in their midst.

Since September 11, 2001, it's been a hassle to be an Arab, or anyone from South Asia or the Middle East, anywhere inside the United States. If you look "Middle Eastern," you get extra attention. As long as this kind of heat is on, potential Islamic terrorists apparently feel the odds are too much against them to risk an attack. It's also noted that convicted terrorists tend to get life sentences, to be served in very austere, maximum security prisons.

It's also been harder to get a visa to enter the United States, although this is somewhat moot because a determined terrorist can still hire a professional people smuggler to get him in via Mexico, or even Canada. Thus one must credit increased alertness of all Americans, and especially those in Moslem-American communities, for doing the most to prevent another attack. But the alertness is already beginning to fade, and the potential for another attack remains.


TOPICS: Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: borders; crushislam; homelandsecurity; islam; muslims; muslimsinamerica; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2006 9:24:35 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

This is not suprising because American Muslims know that if another attack ever does happen to America, the non-Muslims will rightfully respond in angry backlash against the Muslim community so they, the latter is going proactive.


2 posted on 10/23/2006 9:32:39 AM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

What about the shootings at the El AL Counter, Synagogue shootings, and the Islamofascists running people over?

Not disparaging the article, but those attacks have to be factored into the equation somehow.


3 posted on 10/23/2006 9:32:49 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
"It's also been harder to get a visa to enter the United States, although this is somewhat moot because a determined terrorist can ... get in via Mexico, or even Canada."

Gee. What a novel idea.

4 posted on 10/23/2006 9:33:13 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

"Mr. Rodenberry, why are there no Muslims on Star Trek?"


5 posted on 10/23/2006 9:34:14 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I think the reason they haven't had a return engagement is that they are getting the message that that one more, and they will all be either strung up or forced to leave. Instead, outfits like CAIR have been assigned to peck us to death.


6 posted on 10/23/2006 9:34:25 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

Most likely viewed as sudden jihad action.


7 posted on 10/23/2006 9:38:06 AM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Valin

It seems to me that we still have an alarming shortfall of Arab speakers available to the intelligence community, and an enourmous backlog of intercepted communication to be translated. I profess no intimate knowldege of this area, but it seems to this casual observer that if the Muslim community really were significantly interested in stopping Islamic terror, we would have a shortage of material for them to translate.


8 posted on 10/23/2006 9:40:55 AM PDT by Humble Servant (Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

That's easy: Because Bush had the guts to try and fight them and prevent any more major attacks from happening.


9 posted on 10/23/2006 9:41:32 AM PDT by Chewie84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I think this may be BS. It may be that we have not had an attack because, after 9/11, anything smaller would be seen by the Muzzies as an anti-climactic failure.


10 posted on 10/23/2006 9:43:33 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
"Mr. Rodenberry, why are there no Muslims on Star Trek?"


There are. I call them "Klingons".
11 posted on 10/23/2006 9:43:40 AM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
the non-Muslims will rightfully respond in angry backlash against the Muslim community

Excuse me?? "Rightfully??" It would be "rightful" for non-Muslims to attack innocent bystanders in retaliation for a terrorist attack?? What country are you talking about? Seriously, retaliation against American Muslims would probably happen, but that retaliation would be a criminal act, deserving of punishment to the full extent of applicable laws. I can't believe any thoughtful American would call it "rightful."

12 posted on 10/23/2006 9:44:39 AM PDT by ER Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

there are no moslems in the future.


13 posted on 10/23/2006 9:45:18 AM PDT by Huevos Rancheros (Support Radio Free Mexico....Cesar Chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
This is not suprising because American Muslims know that if another attack ever does happen to America, the non-Muslims will rightfully respond in angry backlash against the Muslim community so they, the latter is going proactive.

I wouldn't say "rightfully" for blaming a whole people for what a small proportion of radicals do (it would be like blaming all Anglos in Oklahoma for McVeigh's OKC bombing...). The majority of Muslims reject all such definitions of jihad. Unfortunately, they are too easily lumped with the others.

14 posted on 10/23/2006 9:45:38 AM PDT by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Because Star Trek is in the future.


15 posted on 10/23/2006 9:46:00 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD; Biggirl
"I think the reason they haven't had a return engagement is that they are getting the message that that one more, and they will all be either strung up or forced to leave."

I don't believe this for a minute. Can you show me anything that would lead you to believe that the average American Citizen would somehow rise up against the ROP simply because of another terrorist attack? On the contrary, it appears Americans will follow there "leaders" proclamations about "hijacking" of Islam, Muslim "moderates" and the religion of peace.
16 posted on 10/23/2006 9:47:42 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Because..."Star Trek" takes place in the future.


17 posted on 10/23/2006 9:47:54 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Killborn
What about the shootings at the El AL Counter, Synagogue shootings, and the Islamofascists running people over?

Anyone, Muslim or not, can go off like that. The difference between that and an attack carried out by Al Qaeda is the planning and coordinating that an Al Qaeda attack usually brings. We will always have lone gunmen who will have any number of motivations for choosing their targets.

18 posted on 10/23/2006 9:48:58 AM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GoBucks2002

So individual acts by individual IFs are not acts of terrorism?


19 posted on 10/23/2006 9:50:32 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Zawahiri once let slip in one of his communiques to Zarqawi that the massive US incursions into Afghanistan and Iraq were unexpected. They expected a paper tiger, and were surprised when a live one appeared instead.

Their surprise and fear of the strong US response should be factored into any judgement about why no further attacks on US soil have occurred.

20 posted on 10/23/2006 9:52:47 AM PDT by beckett (Amor Fati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson