You have got to be absolutely kidding me.
Wow, I am speechless.
The only endoresment more shocking would to have been from the other paper, P-I
llevrok, of the Olympia llevroks.
If you read the endorsement, you almost get the idea that the editors are trying to discourage conservative voters from voting.
WA Ping
But . . . but . . . Maria Cantwell is so, like, Seattleoid.
There's more of them lined up on Boeing field, ready to launch.
Seattle times already endorsed Rep Dave Reichert (R) over challenger Darcy Burner (D) for the 8th district.
Wow!
"In a related note, shortly after the Seattle Times endorsed McGavick, pigs were seen flying around the Space Needle."
Is that what that was all about? I gotta go wash my derned car!
Now if the Seattle PI endorses McGavrick as well, take cover, for the day of judgement is upon us! ;-)
It's a good thing their clock was stopped.
Two days ago in our local paper Tri-City Herald they said he was doing so poorly 35% to Cantdowells, 55% (or something like that) that the RNC was going to quit putting money into his campaign and not fund commercials during the last two weeks of the election.
I was quite impressed with the commercials that just started showing the differences between him and Can'tdowell.
Sounds like a lib to me. Why should I care if this idiot wins?
It take imagination to be a nation of quitters?? It takes imagination to embolden Al Qaeda by handing them a victory in Iraq and allowing them to say they drove the US military out of Iraq?? What takes imagination is to believe that would not make the US less safe in the world, swell the ranks of the jihadists and allow them to take over Iraq and its oil resources to be a new training ground and treasure chest from which to launch Al Qaeda terrorism throughout the world. It also takes imagination to not realize it will also make things worse for us in Afghanistan as the jihadists then re-deploy there to replicate their successful effort to get us to retreat in Iraq.
Anyway, what a stupid comment for this newspaper to make even if I'm glad they are wisely endorsing McGavick otherwise. By the way, I'm guessing the Seattle P.I. is endorsing Cantwell. Does this paper have much circulation?
This is just another of the wacky endorsements fpr the left coast. The LAT for Arnold and the Oregonian for Saxton. Whatevwer is this world coming to? :-).
This is a surprise! I don't see it having a major effect. Perhaps a few latte-drinking, volvo-driving social liberals who are pro-business may switch their votes to McGavick due to this, but not enough to change the outcome.
I've seen newspapers around here endorse the Republican when the Republican didn't stand any chance of winning. They will also endorse the Republican when the Democrat has zero chance of winning. Making useless endorsements of Republicans this way gives lying scumbag newspapers like the Seattle Times the chance to say, "See? We're non-partisan."
And the Cleveland New Dealer endorsed Mike DeWine. There is something afoot here.