Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Links to references at site
1 posted on 10/20/2006 8:32:06 PM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: bnelson44

Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comment.


99 posted on 10/21/2006 9:37:32 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Save


101 posted on 10/21/2006 9:40:51 AM PDT by sinclair (Democrats, it's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44; MaineVoter2002; crazyhorse691; MelonFarmerJ; bitt; nuconvert; Doctor Raoul; rfp1234; ...
I don't consider this to be anything necessarily new. I, and others, have suspected the Democrats of undermining this nation in order to achieve and maintain political power for decades. So my questions would along these lines:

1. How many Democrat politicians in general have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?

2. How many Democrat politicians who have been serving on United States intelligence committees have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking sensitive information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?

3. How many Democrats, who work for Democrat politicians, have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking sensitive information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?

4. How many Democrats, who are employed by the intelligence agencies, have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking sensitive information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?

5. How many Democrat politicians, their employees, and Democrats who work for the intelligence agencies have been leaking information to United States media, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency, or with the intent to have the U.S. Media covertly pass the information on to contacts in foreign governments? How long has this been going on?

6. As Doctor Raoul's post reminds me - How many Democrat politicians, their employees, democrats working for the intelligence agencies, and media employees are currently communicating with terrorist organizations in an effort to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long have you people been doing this?

An investigation and retribution is long overdue for those who have been engaging in these activities.

107 posted on 10/21/2006 9:57:54 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

110 posted on 10/21/2006 10:04:30 AM PDT by MarineBrat (God Bless Tonk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pitbully

ping T (treasonous) Kennedy


114 posted on 10/21/2006 10:22:40 AM PDT by granite (Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Ping...interesting and frightening, too.


124 posted on 10/21/2006 12:53:34 PM PDT by luvie (We didn’t lose almost 3000 people that day.We lost one wonderful person at a time, almost 3000 times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

The media did everything they could to shill for a nuclear freeze in 1983-84, producing garbage like "The Day After."

They told us Mondale would win until the day before the election, when they began to cover themselves. Up until then they had called Reagan too old, too stupid, too dangerous, too sleepy, and too ideological. They had said the female vote for Geraldine Ferraro would be the difference. They were lying communist scoundrels then as now.

But I'll never forget USA Today's headline the day before the election: REAGAN SEEKS 50 STATE SWEEP. He was the greatest.


125 posted on 10/21/2006 12:59:09 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

What a piece of filth Ted Kennedy is.


128 posted on 10/21/2006 1:18:35 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Jimmy Carter Under Fire for Recruiting Soviets Against Reagan

Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com
Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2002
WASHINGTON Former President Jimmy Carter owes an explanation to the American people for his behavior during the Cold War, says the author of a new book.

"Reagans War reveals new information that Carter, as president and later as a private citizen, sought the help of an avowed foreign enemy of this country to undermine Reagans candidacy in 1980 and, even more shocking, tried to cripple President Reagans foreign policy in 1984.

The former Democrat president, who had been ousted by voters four years earlier, wanted the Soviets to help him put a Democrat back in the White House.

Speaking Tuesday at a seminar at the Institute of World Politics, the books author, Peter Schweizer, said Jimmy Carter owes a full explanation, and then depending on his answer, a decision could be made as to whether the former president "stepped over the line from pure dissent to giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

NewsMax.com CEO Christopher Ruddy has written that Carter "may well have committed treason by enlisting the help of the Soviet Union in the 1980 and 1984 presidential elections.

"Its a fair question for him [Carter] to give his account of what happened, and a response, which he has not done, the author told NewsMax.com. "Then, you know, depending on his reaction and response, there needs to be further discussion. The other thing potentially that perhaps ought to be asked [is] that Moscow release any files it has on the meetings.

"All we have right now, Schweizer added, "is based on these accounts by [former Soviet Ambassador] Dobrynin. And it begs the question: Is there any more material based on his [Carters] dealings with Moscow?

'Carter Won't Forget' Soviet Assistance

Schweizers book, which is going straight to the top of the best-seller list, reveals that during the 1980 campaign when Reagan was gaining in the polls, Carter "dispatched [pro-Soviet industrialist] Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy for a secret meeting with Ambassador Dobrynin to ask for Soviet help with Jewish emigration and other potential vote-getting issues for a sitting president. The Soviets were promised that "Carter wont forget that service if he is re-elected.

Schweizer reports that when Reagan was running for re-election in 1984, Carter himself visited Ambassador Dobrynin warning there "would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan was in power.

Carter wanted the Soviet Union to help the Democrats regain the presidency. History shows his prophecy about no hope for a nuclear arms agreement to be wrong. It was a part of Reagan's success in ending the Cold War on Americas terms.

Asking Carter to explain to Americans this part of his stewardship is most "reasonable, in Schweizers view. When he asked the former president about this, all the author got was "No comment.

location: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/29/201145.shtml



Peter Schweizer, a Hoover Institution research fellow, has just written a new book, "Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism."

This book may well force historians to revise the history of the Cold War.

Schweizer, after scouring once-classified KGB, East German Stasi and Soviet Communist Party files, discovered incontrovertible evidence that the Soviets not only played footsie with high-ranking Democrats, they also worked behind the scenes to influence American elections.

In "Reagan's War," Schweizer shows how the Democrats worked with Moscow to try to undermine Reagan before and after he became president.

Jimmy Carter's Dirty Tricks

Soviet diplomatic accounts and material from the archives show that in January 1984, former President Jimmy Carter dropped by Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin's residence for a private meeting.

Carter expressed his concern about and opposition to Reagan's defense buildup. He boldly told Dobrynin that Moscow would be better off with someone else in the White House. If Reagan won, he warned, "There would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan remained in power."

Using the Russians to influence the presidential election was nothing new for Carter.

Schweizer reveals Russian documents that show that in the waning days of the 1980 campaign, the Carter White House dispatched businessman Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy.

Hammer was a longtime Soviet-phile, and he explained to the Soviet ambassador that Carter was "clearly alarmed" at the prospect of losing to Reagan.

Hammer pleaded with the Russians for help. He asked if the Kremlin could expand Jewish emigration to bolster Carter's standing in the polls.

'Carter Won't Forget That Service'

"Carter won't forget that service if he is elected," Hammer told Dobrynin.

Carter was not the only Democrat to make clear to the Russians where their loyalty lay. As the election neared in 1984, Dobrynin recalls meetings with Speaker of the House Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill.

O'Neill told Dobrynin that no effort should be spared to prevent "that demagogue Reagan" from being re-elected.



location:

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/10/16/214040


137 posted on 10/22/2006 12:51:13 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

TREASON BUMP


138 posted on 10/22/2006 12:54:30 AM PDT by kitkat (The first step down to hell is to deny the existence of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
"If there’s an honest liberal left in the country, it would be nice to have their take on this revelation."

Silly person!

142 posted on 10/22/2006 6:13:33 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Bump for later cogitation.


148 posted on 06/01/2007 6:57:15 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson