Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Caucus to Nancy Pelosi: Hands Off William Jefferson (timely repeat)
News Max ^ | May 26, 2006 | Editor

Posted on 10/20/2006 7:01:38 PM PDT by yoe

The Congressional Black Caucus is in open revolt over House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's attempt to discipline Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., after he was caught red handed with $90,000 in alleged bribe money.

And at least one CBC staffer is warning that any move against Jefferson could jeopardize Democrat chances to retake the House this fall.

According to Roll Call, Pelosi checked with key members of the CBC before she told Jefferson on Tuesday that he should resign his post on the House Ways and Means Committee "in the interest of upholding the high ethical standard of the House Democratic Caucus."

Rather than complying, Jefferson defied the top Democrat - and instead accused her of discrimination, arguing that other ethically challenged Democrats faced no such discipline.

Things got uglier on Wednesday when some of the same CBC members who had OK'd the Pelosi putsch changed their minds.

"A members-only CBC lunch meeting produced an emotional consensus that Pelosi had overreached since Jefferson has not been charged with any crimes," said Roll Call.

"One after another, CBC members rallied behind their colleague, arguing that he was being singled out."

"I would say that the people who spoke were very vehement in their opposition," CBC member James Clyburn told the paper.

Jefferson's defenders cited Rep. Alan Mollohan, who was forced to step aside as the ranking member of the ethics committee but permitted to keep his coveted seat on the Appropriations Committee.

"There's no precedent for doing this to someone who has not been indicted," complained CBC member Al Wynn.

By late Wednesday, top CBC members, including Charlie Rangel, John Conyers and John Lewis, had informed Pelosi that the entire Black Caucus would publicly oppose any attempt to discipline Jefferson - a move that could severely undermine African American support in this year's mid term election."I think she's taking us down to the point where on Nov. 8 she'll still be the Minority Leader," an aide to a CBC member told Roll Call, in a none too thinly veiled threat.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: black; caucus; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Cobra64

I understand your point. My point is, they have a backbone, sometimes they just don't know what to do with it. If it weren't for the House Republicans, the Senate immigration reform bill would be the law of the land.


21 posted on 10/20/2006 7:29:31 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Best case scenario: Jefferson is reelected, then in due time he is indicted, and either resigns or is convicted and goes to prison. Meanwhile, Jendal is elected governor in next year's election and appoints a Republican to take Jefferson's place.

Well, I can dream, can't I?

22 posted on 10/20/2006 7:30:10 PM PDT by 19th LA Inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
What a gift. It seems the black/white democratic alliance may be weakening.

Wishful thinking. Pelosi and the Dem leadership have no principles that they wouldn't jettison to keep the black vote on the plantation.

23 posted on 10/20/2006 7:35:34 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Jefferson is dead meat. The Congressional Black Caucus ought to be able to figure that out. So what's the big deal if the Congressional leadership takes the opportunity to give him a wrist slap?


24 posted on 10/20/2006 7:35:52 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"There's no precedent for doing this to someone who has not been indicted," complained CBC member Al Wynn.

Brings to mind a Bill Murray scene. "Stripes"? Reaching way back here.

He and a bud were trying to enlist. Recruiter asks, "Ever been convicted of a crime?"

Murray, with full irony..."Convicted?" Hmmmmmm

25 posted on 10/20/2006 7:36:34 PM PDT by don-o (Monthly donor and proud of it! There is NO free lunch! Visualize no Free Republic. Not pretty is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"...arguing that other ethically challenged Democrats faced no such discipline."

Of course, he's right about that. But to discipline democrats even-handedly, all of them would have to step down.

In this case, it's really not about ethics per se but the appearance of ethics. Jefferson got caught dead to rights and that's the difference.

26 posted on 10/20/2006 7:37:23 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Rather than complying, Jefferson defied the top Democrat - and instead accused her of discrimination, arguing that other ethically challenged Democrats faced no such discipline.

Yeah...they wouldn't dare print Jefferson's exact words in the form of a quote.

No way that Jefferson would be so vague in his term 'other ethically challenged democrats'.

These politicians are usually smart enough to have dirt on one another for these types of surprise events in their careers.

And with 900 FBI files, Bill and Hillary were the masters.

27 posted on 10/20/2006 7:37:31 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Just below here is SUE ME! I was typing fast!


28 posted on 10/20/2006 7:37:39 PM PDT by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yoe

The Republicans could make a great commercial out of this one.


29 posted on 10/20/2006 7:39:17 PM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Now Watch,,,He'll get reelected,,,Da' Mayor backs him.
30 posted on 10/20/2006 7:42:39 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush gal in LA
Money in the refrigerator, reeferations.

Kind of a stretch, but I got it!

31 posted on 10/20/2006 7:45:42 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: don-o

"Convicted? No, never convicted."

"Are either of you homosexual?"

"No, but we willing to try"

"Do they send us someplace special?"


32 posted on 10/20/2006 7:51:58 PM PDT by guinnessman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Sorry. I bow to your superior knowledge.


33 posted on 10/20/2006 7:57:22 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bush gal in LA
"Just below here is SUE ME! I was typing fast!'

OK, but I'm going to need an address to send the subpoena to.
34 posted on 10/20/2006 8:01:22 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: guinnessman
"No, but we willing to try"

YES!!

Where else but this board could one get that instant recall?

35 posted on 10/20/2006 8:05:32 PM PDT by don-o (Monthly donor and proud of it! There is NO free lunch! Visualize no Free Republic. Not pretty is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Hmm, when my wife says that it usually means something else ;-)

Blacks and the Dem leadership always seem to find a way to kiss and make up when it comes time to fight evil [Republicans]. I simply don't see any evidence that is going to change anytime soon.


36 posted on 10/20/2006 8:08:29 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Because we are the Wusspublicans who can't seem to screw up the courage for anything. We'll let him skate for sure. Pathetic.


37 posted on 10/20/2006 9:35:15 PM PDT by bust (A biased media is the biggest threat to our democracy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"There's no precedent for doing this to someone who has not been indicted," complained CBC member Al Wynn.

Mmmm, let me fix that somewhat. "There's no precedent for doing this TO A DEMOCRAT who has not been indicted". there, thats more accurate.

38 posted on 10/20/2006 9:50:12 PM PDT by jdub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"A members-only CBC lunch meeting produced an emotional consensus that Pelosi had overreached since Jefferson has not been charged with any crimes," said Roll Call.

Eating their own again ;-)
39 posted on 10/21/2006 5:07:20 AM PDT by angelsonmyside (Why won't Nancy talk now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

"Bro Jackson was only tryin' to he'p out a foreign diginitry, fer cryin' out loud.

The bro got a email from Nigerian General Kachinga Cheatchusuckah.
The General needed $100 million foreign aid quick-like.

In return for Bro Jackson's he'p, Gen Cheatchusuckah's gonna transfer $500
billion of Idi Amin's secret Ugandan gold reserves from a Swiss bank vault
to a refrigerated truck Jackson leased."

40 posted on 10/21/2006 7:00:55 AM PDT by Liz (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson