Skip to comments.
Tancredo has an obligation
The Denver Post ^
| 10/14/2006
Posted on 10/19/2006 12:11:19 PM PDT by NapkinUser
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
An endorsement from the left-wing Denver Post. I did not see that coming.
To: NapkinUser
"unyielding. (That's [not] bad.)" Controlling our borders is an issue of principle. Never compromise your principles. It would be a sell-out if you did.
2
posted on
10/19/2006 12:13:37 PM PDT
by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: NapkinUser
I saw it coming. Liberals are figuring out that illegals are eating into their social program money.
3
posted on
10/19/2006 12:14:28 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: NapkinUser
So Tancredo is good as long as he "compromises" his positions.
4
posted on
10/19/2006 12:14:31 PM PDT
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: NapkinUser
A "sensible middle ground" on immigration is like a sensible middle ground on cancer. It will get you killed.
5
posted on
10/19/2006 12:14:42 PM PDT
by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: NapkinUser
You could just see them holding their noses when thay made this endorsement. I bet it nearly killed that cluster of left-wing, me-tooers who inevitably follow the lead of the NY Times and Wash Post. And doesn't that intellectual colossus Cindy Rodriguez sit on the ed board? Reading between the lines, I would bet money the publisher stepped in and told them what to do.
6
posted on
10/19/2006 12:17:36 PM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: NapkinUser
It shows how powerful the anti-illegal movement has become. Now the pro-illegal forces are attempting to save what they can.
7
posted on
10/19/2006 12:19:48 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Good fences make good neighbors)
To: NapkinUser
Translation:
We didn't support Tancredo's re-election bid in 2004, preferring challenger Joanna Conti who would have served without Tancredo's polarizing persona and single-item agenda doing anything to deter our effort to build a permanent power base out of a dependant Hispanic underclass.
But Tancredo has worked hard to advance an important issue that others would like to ignore we would have preferred remained ignored, and we believe he can contribute to its resolution by caving in to what we wanted in the first place. Members of the House and Senate have hit a stalemate, but there are 12 million reasons they should forge an agreement potential Democrat votes.
8
posted on
10/19/2006 12:21:24 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
That was great!! You nailed them to the wall.
9
posted on
10/19/2006 12:22:58 PM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: 3AngelaD
Given my years of dealings with enviro-crooks, deconvoluting liberal-speak has become somewhat of a specialty.
10
posted on
10/19/2006 12:28:27 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: NapkinUser
Rove is a genius for . how he stampeded the liberals into falling for the "comprehensive" reform plan, playing upon their animosities towards conservatives and average Americans.
11
posted on
10/19/2006 12:32:08 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: NapkinUser
You should have. The Post will endorse conservatives in races where the Democrats have no chance of winning simply so that they can answer complaints about only endorsing liberal candidates/positions by saying, "Well, we endorsed Tancredo too."
12
posted on
10/19/2006 12:32:12 PM PDT
by
Starter
To: Carry_Okie
Bump!
Good Liberal Double-Speak decoding!
13
posted on
10/19/2006 12:33:19 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Starter
"Tancredo has resisted any approach that could provide a path to citizenship for immigrants who fulfill various requirements. That's a cornerstone of the president's plan and the Senate's, and properly so."
gagg me. The VERY reason the Republican party is divided, in a critical election year, is because of Bush, yet everyone BUT Bush is suppose to compromise?
15
posted on
10/19/2006 12:55:40 PM PDT
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08)
To: Kimberly GG
" We endorse his candidacy with trepidation. We know he'd have to swallow hard to make a compromise with the White House, but after Election Day it will be time to find common ground.
We provide this free advice to Rep. Tancredo: For every thing there is a season. A time to kick and scream. A time to be pragmatic. The issue has been joined. The public expects a resolution. "
What a load of condescending &*)*&#!!!
16
posted on
10/19/2006 12:59:29 PM PDT
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08)
To: Carry_Okie
Yes, I believe you have gleaned the pure essence of the article.
Let's review a few definitions from the socialist/leftist play book.
a leading role : getting behind our plan
comprehensive solution : collapse on principle
kick and scream : telling the truth (in opposition to leftist dogma) at any volume, while sitting or standing
polarizing : any argument that advances the idea that our nation's laws should be upheld, or that there actually is a moral right and wrong
pragmatic : accepting our point of view
relentless : unreasonable, unwilling to compromise, unwilling to accept criminality, unwilling to support the DNC
respectable alternative : term used to describe our candidates in order to infer their candidates are not respectable
sensible resolution : one that sees our views implemented concerning all points
single item agenda : support for any single issue (by itself or among many) we can't win on the merits, and must demagogue
twelve million reasons : 17.2 million votes
This sentence is a doozie : 'The Senate and President Bush have fashioned comprehensive immigration reform that includes border security, employer sanctions, a guest-worker program and an eventual path to citizenship.'
Name one point mentioned in this sentence that wasn't a part of the 1986 Amnesty. The border security part is being sold as something new and a real change. I don't think it's all that serious, and in seven years we'll have ten million illegals in this nation whether we legalize everyone here now or not.
17
posted on
10/19/2006 1:05:26 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: NapkinUser
An endorsement from the left-wing Denver Post. I did not see that coming. You should have. The media will endorse any Republican :cough, cough: McCain :cough, cough: they think is useful in hurting the party overall. Tancredo has proved he is willing to destroy the GOP so as long as he gets attention.
So, did Tancredo's latest check clear into your bank account?
18
posted on
10/19/2006 1:09:03 PM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: NapkinUser
Yeah, the Post Hole offering advice to Tom.
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson