Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo has an obligation
The Denver Post ^ | 10/14/2006

Posted on 10/19/2006 12:11:19 PM PDT by NapkinUser

Tom Tancredo wasn't the first to wave the flag on illegal immigration, but he's been among the most relentless. (That's good.) Unfortunately, he's also been among the most unyielding. (That's bad.)

By his willingness to sound the alarm, the Republican who holds Colorado's 6th Congressional District seat has become the face of the anti-illegal movement. Now it's time to achieve a solution, and Tancredo can play a leading role if he has the nerve to see it through.

We didn't support Tancredo's re-election bid in 2004, preferring challenger Joanna Conti who would have served without Tancredo's polarizing persona and single-item agenda.

But Tancredo has worked hard to advance an important issue that others would like to ignore, and we believe he can contribute to its resolution. Members of the House and Senate have hit a stalemate, but there are 12 million reasons they should forge an agreement.

We urge voters in the 6th to give Tancredo a chance to champion a comprehensive solution. We endorse his candidacy with trepidation. We know he'd have to swallow hard to make a compromise with the White House, but after Election Day it will be time to find common ground.

We provide this free advice to Rep. Tancredo: For every thing there is a season. A time to kick and scream. A time to be pragmatic. The issue has been joined. The public expects a resolution.

Tancredo's opponent, Democrat Bill Winter, is no stranger to public service and is a respectable alternative for voters who believe Tancredo is wrong on his issue and unlikely to help achieve a solution. Winter is a veteran of the Navy and Marines and offers a valuable voice on military matters. A former educator, he's ready to reform the unworkable No Child Left Behind law.

Winter also takes a sensible middle ground on immigration.

The Senate and President Bush have fashioned comprehensive immigration reform that includes border security, employer sanctions, a guest-worker program and an eventual path to citizenship. Tancredo says he doesn't oppose a guest worker program in theory but that border security must come first. A key area for compromise would resolve the impasse over the legal status of 12 million illegal immigrants already in this country. Tancredo has resisted any approach that could provide a path to citizenship for immigrants who fulfill various requirements. That's a cornerstone of the president's plan and the Senate's, and properly so.

We've come to respect Tancredo's effort to force the issue - he's a born provocateur. He'll need to show flexibility if he truly expects to solve the problem.

"I would love to see us pass something that really does something and get this behind us than to have a debate that becomes more rancorous," Tancredo told us recently.

It's entirely possible, and he has an obligation to get it done.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 2006; aliens; immigrantlist; immigration; tancredo; tancredo08; tomtancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
An endorsement from the left-wing Denver Post. I did not see that coming.
1 posted on 10/19/2006 12:11:20 PM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

"unyielding. (That's [not] bad.)" Controlling our borders is an issue of principle. Never compromise your principles. It would be a sell-out if you did.


2 posted on 10/19/2006 12:13:37 PM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

I saw it coming. Liberals are figuring out that illegals are eating into their social program money.


3 posted on 10/19/2006 12:14:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
So Tancredo is good as long as he "compromises" his positions.
4 posted on 10/19/2006 12:14:31 PM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

A "sensible middle ground" on immigration is like a sensible middle ground on cancer. It will get you killed.


5 posted on 10/19/2006 12:14:42 PM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

You could just see them holding their noses when thay made this endorsement. I bet it nearly killed that cluster of left-wing, me-tooers who inevitably follow the lead of the NY Times and Wash Post. And doesn't that intellectual colossus Cindy Rodriguez sit on the ed board? Reading between the lines, I would bet money the publisher stepped in and told them what to do.


6 posted on 10/19/2006 12:17:36 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

It shows how powerful the anti-illegal movement has become. Now the pro-illegal forces are attempting to save what they can.


7 posted on 10/19/2006 12:19:48 PM PDT by dirtboy (Good fences make good neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Translation:

We didn't support Tancredo's re-election bid in 2004, preferring challenger Joanna Conti who would have served without Tancredo's polarizing persona and single-item agenda doing anything to deter our effort to build a permanent power base out of a dependant Hispanic underclass.

But Tancredo has worked hard to advance an important issue that others would like to ignore we would have preferred remained ignored, and we believe he can contribute to its resolution by caving in to what we wanted in the first place. Members of the House and Senate have hit a stalemate, but there are 12 million reasons they should forge an agreement potential Democrat votes.

8 posted on 10/19/2006 12:21:24 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

That was great!! You nailed them to the wall.


9 posted on 10/19/2006 12:22:58 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Given my years of dealings with enviro-crooks, deconvoluting liberal-speak has become somewhat of a specialty.
10 posted on 10/19/2006 12:28:27 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Rove is a genius for . how he stampeded the liberals into falling for the "comprehensive" reform plan, playing upon their animosities towards conservatives and average Americans.


11 posted on 10/19/2006 12:32:08 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

You should have. The Post will endorse conservatives in races where the Democrats have no chance of winning simply so that they can answer complaints about only endorsing liberal candidates/positions by saying, "Well, we endorsed Tancredo too."


12 posted on 10/19/2006 12:32:12 PM PDT by Starter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Bump!

Good Liberal Double-Speak decoding!

13 posted on 10/19/2006 12:33:19 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Starter

Exactly.


14 posted on 10/19/2006 12:42:30 PM PDT by confederacy of dunces (Workin' & lurkin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

"Tancredo has resisted any approach that could provide a path to citizenship for immigrants who fulfill various requirements. That's a cornerstone of the president's plan and the Senate's, and properly so."

gagg me. The VERY reason the Republican party is divided, in a critical election year, is because of Bush, yet everyone BUT Bush is suppose to compromise?


15 posted on 10/19/2006 12:55:40 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

" We endorse his candidacy with trepidation. We know he'd have to swallow hard to make a compromise with the White House, but after Election Day it will be time to find common ground.

We provide this free advice to Rep. Tancredo: For every thing there is a season. A time to kick and scream. A time to be pragmatic. The issue has been joined. The public expects a resolution. "

What a load of condescending &*)*&#!!!


16 posted on 10/19/2006 12:59:29 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Yes, I believe you have gleaned the pure essence of the article.

Let's review a few definitions from the socialist/leftist play book.

a leading role : getting behind our plan

comprehensive solution : collapse on principle

kick and scream : telling the truth (in opposition to leftist dogma) at any volume, while sitting or standing

polarizing : any argument that advances the idea that our nation's laws should be upheld, or that there actually is a moral right and wrong

pragmatic : accepting our point of view

relentless : unreasonable, unwilling to compromise, unwilling to accept criminality, unwilling to support the DNC

respectable alternative : term used to describe our candidates in order to infer their candidates are not respectable

sensible resolution : one that sees our views implemented concerning all points

single item agenda : support for any single issue (by itself or among many) we can't win on the merits, and must demagogue

twelve million reasons : 17.2 million votes


This sentence is a doozie : 'The Senate and President Bush have fashioned comprehensive immigration reform that includes border security, employer sanctions, a guest-worker program and an eventual path to citizenship.'

Name one point mentioned in this sentence that wasn't a part of the 1986 Amnesty. The border security part is being sold as something new and a real change. I don't think it's all that serious, and in seven years we'll have ten million illegals in this nation whether we legalize everyone here now or not.
17 posted on 10/19/2006 1:05:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
An endorsement from the left-wing Denver Post. I did not see that coming.

You should have. The media will endorse any Republican :cough, cough: McCain :cough, cough: they think is useful in hurting the party overall. Tancredo has proved he is willing to destroy the GOP so as long as he gets attention.

So, did Tancredo's latest check clear into your bank account?

18 posted on 10/19/2006 1:09:03 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Yeah, the Post Hole offering advice to Tom.


19 posted on 10/19/2006 1:12:57 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


20 posted on 10/19/2006 1:13:44 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson