Posted on 10/19/2006 9:35:15 AM PDT by Reindeercards
The idea of universal suffrage has long been controversial. Indeed, it took this country nearly two centuries to extend the franchise to all citizens; women didn't get the right to vote until 1920. Voters have the power to shift the political consensus in their favor, so it's a radical proposition to believe that every citizen -- regardless of race, creed or color, income, education or ZIP code -- should be able to cast a ballot. It is a testament to the vitality of this nation's democratic ideals that the franchise is now universally applied.
Recently, however, a new wave of rebellion against that egalitarian ideal has cropped up; a new generation of politicians, mostly Republicans, is determined to snatch the franchise away from some Americans. Just a month ago, the GOP-dominated House passed a bill that would require government-issued photo IDs to vote in federal elections. And several Republican-led state legislatures have either passed stringent voter ID rules or imposed onerous regulations for voter registration.
Republican leaders have strained mightily to convince the courts that they are just protecting the franchise from voter fraud. Consider the widespread threat of illegal immigrants sneaking into the polls to vote, just as they sneaked into our country to work. Or those Dumpster-diving impostors who steal someone's light bill out of the trash and then use it as ID to cast a fraudulent ballot. Come on. I've heard 7-year-olds spin more convincing yarns.
According to USA Today, a preliminary report commissioned by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission has found little evidence of the sort of fraud that the burdensome new regulations purport to prevent. The bipartisan report found that "there is little polling-place fraud, or at least much less than is claimed, including voter impersonation, 'dead' voters, noncitizen voting and felon voters,"
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Since there's so rarely a substantial investigation into voter fraud, I'm not shocked they've found little evidence. People who aren't look often don't find the thing they aren't looking for.
But let's take the claim at face value and say that all of these allegations every election of widespread voter fraud is overblown.
Why don't we render a service to the country and PROVE its not happening? We could take camera phones and camcorders into vote counting locations and document the vote counters as they AREN'T voting piles of blank ballots or "finishing up" partially filled out ballots by voting for the Democrat in the remaining races.
Then we could upload all the videos to the internet so everyone could see for themselves that our voting system is corruption free.
Thoughts?
Either DEMS win or there is voter fraud. /sarcasm
Saving this one for the Liberals when they lose... They will be marching on D.C. claiming disenfranchisement due to DIEBOLD..... booga... booga...Rove knew, Cheney is the Devil... Bush is bad...
Tucker must have brown eyes cause she's so full of ...
We must have a picture ID to drive. We must have a picture ID to buy booze. We must have a ID to check out a library book.
I think voting is more important, and more worth safeguarding, than driving, drinking, or getting a book!
Excellent news. So we shouldn't see a huge drop off in voting in Dem districts. And if the voters are legit, they can still vote after they show their ID.
to get more information.
How exactly would requiring photos IDs "disenfranchise" American citizens?
Of course there is voter fraud. Apparently the writer of this editorial hasn't paid attention to the news immediately before and after an election.
Nothing to see here. Move along you lookieloos.
It is so ridiculously easy for a person to register in multiple locations and then request absentee ballots to vote multiple times. When you register to vote in one state nobody checks to see if you are registered in another state.
I could have voted 6 times in the last election, using the voter registration cards of my kids who live out of state and are registered elsewhere.
The only reason voter fraud is not completely out of control is because most people can't be bothered to vote even once, much less multiple times.
Nice try cyndy.
Not sure I quite follow your thinking.
Candidate Smith loses the election. He cries fraud. Fraud is found. Turns out the majority of voters wanted Candidate Smith to win. So the results are overturned, and Candidate Smith is put in office.
Now his political career is over because:
1) He is now an incumbent?
2) He gave his party a victory out of the jaws of defeat?
3) He helped the majority of voters get what they wanted?
4) He stopped fraud and corruption in our electoral system?
Government-issued picture IDs used for voting don't cost the voter anything. They CAN'T, under the Twenty-Third Amendment. So why is there any amount of worry about the poor being disenfranchised?
The way most polling places are set up, the only way to catch someone is if the real voter or a poll worker who personally knows the real voter overhears the person misrepresent his identity. Photo ID laws are under challenge in the few states that actually have passed it (my guess is that the 7th circuit upholds Indiana's law, the very partisan Georgia judge who overturned Georgia's law twice is reversed, and who knows whether Justice Kennedy blocks the injunction against Arizona's law entered by - you guessed it - the Ninth Circuit).
Either no ID is required, or in many cases a utility bill or even an affidavit are OK. If you cannot ID the voter, you cannot catch the fraud, but this is the new Dem argument (contradicted by the Baker-Carter (yes, Jimmah) Commission's findings).
Because the Dems block any measure to be able to verify voter identity, and therefore we cannot verify voter identity, it must follow that the voters are who they say they are. Not good logic, but it has worked on about half the judges so far.
Come out to Washington State. Voter fraud cost us the gubernatorial election in 2004. That is a fact, not a myth.
Mostly.
Except when it is 100% real.
And that's most of the time.
OH NO!!! Oh, the humanity!! We can't have people showing ID to prove identity! What extreme wacko would think of somthing that insane? IDs are required to cash a check, but IDs for voting? Out of the question! /s
Here in AZ, our lovely governor was bemoaning that poor people and old people would be hardest hit by prop 200 requiring ID to vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.