Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative
"The screener in question has been put on administrative leave."

Caught stealing red handed and only administrative leave? In the private sector she'd be fired on the spot.
5 posted on 10/18/2006 7:39:19 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead (At worst the Pope's comments might cause a "war of words" but mohammedans prefer a "war over words".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texas_Jarhead
just another bad outcome from federalizing screeners. she'll probably be back on the job in a month at a different airport.
9 posted on 10/18/2006 7:46:21 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Caught stealing red handed and only administrative leave? In the private sector she'd be fired on the spot.

It's a union job. It will take years of documentation of that kind of misbehavior to dislodge her from the position.

15 posted on 10/18/2006 7:54:44 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Caught stealing red handed and only administrative leave? In the private sector she'd be fired on the spot.

Not at any large company. Large companies like the government has policies and procedures in place to make sure the event is carefully documented and investigated so that when they fire the person they won't end up getting sued.

Even in what appears to be an obvious case of getting caught red handed, the victim might decide that it isn't worth pressing charges over $20 if it means they might have to return to testify. The thief may have a history with the other TSA employee that tipped off authorities about the money hidden in the magazine rack.

Therefore the suspected thief gets sent home while the situation is investigated throughly, and statements are taken. If the evidence is there the authorities will file charges, and then it's safe and easy for the employer to fire the thief.

Juries are unfortunately too easily sold a conspiracy theory in a wrongful termination suit, and they have a tendency to rule in favor of the poor out of work individual that can't get a job because they were fired when it's a big business or the government that has to pick up the bill.

17 posted on 10/18/2006 8:03:47 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Jarhead
"In the private sector she'd be fired on the spot."

Ah, but you see.... The Democrats INSISTED that all screeners become "Professionalized" -- by becoming FEDERALIZED Civil Servants.....and UNION Dues paying contributors to the Democrat party....

The thieving bitch in this case will probably sue the Government for the embarrassment she has been put through as a result of being caught..

Oh the horrors..

Semper Fi

39 posted on 10/19/2006 1:19:40 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson