Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi’s House
House Mjaority Whip's Office ^ | October 18,2006

Posted on 10/18/2006 11:13:10 AM PDT by PDR

Pelosi’s House

"I pride myself in being called a liberal.” "I don't consider myself a moderate.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) (Time, 9/4/06)

…And she’s not the only one.

“This list of the bills most likely to be championed by committee chairmen in a Pelosi-led House of Representatives would be great fodder for the latenight talk show hosts if it weren’t true,” House Majority Whip Roy Blunt said. “Instead, it’s just plain scary. While Republicans fight the War on Terror, grow our robust economy, and crack down on illegal immigration, House Democrats plot to establish a Department of Peace, raise your taxes, and minimize penalties for crack dealers. The difference couldn’t be starker.” ******

Department of Peace and Nonviolence Act -- H.R. 3760: Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and 74 Democratic cosponsors propose a new “Department of Peace and Nonviolence” as well as “National Peace Day.” Cosponsors include three would-be Democratic Chairmen: John Conyers (Judiciary), George Miller (Education and the Workforce), and Charlie Rangel (Ways and Means).

Gas Stamps -- H.R. 3712: Jim McDermott (D-WA) and eight Democratic cosponsors want a “Gas Stamps” program similar to the Food Stamps program to subsidize the gasoline purchases of qualified individuals.

Less Jail Time for Selling Crack Cocaine – H.R. 2456: Charlie Rangel (D-MI) and 23 Democratic cosponsors want to eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for possessing, importing, and distributing crack cocaine. John Conyers, the would-be Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over the bill, is a cosponsor.

Voting Rights for Criminals – H.R. 1300: John Conyers (D-MI) and 32 Democratic cosponsors, and H.R. 663: Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and 28 Democratic cosponsors would let convicted felons vote. Rep. John Conyers is the would-be Democratic Chairman of the Judiciary Committee which would consider this legislation.

Expand Medicare to Include Diapers -- H.R. 1052: Barney Frank (D-MA) supports Medicare coverage of adult diapers. Barney Frank is the would-be Chairman of the Financial Services Committee.

Nationalized Health Care – H.R. 4683: John Dingell (D-MI) and 18 Democratic cosponsors want to expand Medicare to cover all Americans. John Dingell is the would-be Democratic Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee who along with cosponsors Charlie Rangel, would-be Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, and Henry Waxman, would-be Chairman of the Government Reform Committee, would have jurisdiction over the proposal.

Federal Regulation of Restaurant Menus -- H.R. 5563: Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and 25 Democratic cosponsors authorize federal regulation of the contents of restaurant menus.

Taxpayer Funded Abortions & Elimination of all Restrictions on Abortion, Including Parental Notice – H.R. 5151: Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and 66 Democratic cosponsors want to overturn even minimal restrictions on abortion such as parental notice requirements. The bill would also require taxpayer funding of abortions through the various federal health care programs. John Conyers, the would-be Chairman of Judiciary Committee which has jurisdiction over the bill, is an original cosponsor.

Bill of Welfare Rights -- H.J. Res. 29-35: Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) proposes a Soviet-style “Bill of Welfare Rights,” enshrining the rights of full employment, public education, national healthcare, public housing, abortion, progressive taxation, and union membership. On some these measures, Rep. Jackson is joined by up to 35 Democratic cosponsors, including would-be Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers.

A note about this list: While by no means an exhaustive list of the liberal, out-of-the-mainstream bills introduced by Democratic Members, these bills deserve particular attention because the principle advocates are the very individuals who would be in a position to schedule committee markups and move the legislation through the Congress should the Democrats take control.

For more details on the would-be chairmen….

Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) Elected 1969, 18th term Rep. Obey voted with the AFL-CIO 100% of the time. Obey voted against the Deficit Reduction Act, against Defense Funding (FY06), against the Legislative Line Item Veto, and against funding the Global War on Terror (FY04).

“Mr. Obey was one of those Democrats who ripped Mr. Clinton for endorsing a balanced budget in 1995. Rather than cut spending, his goal would be to spend less on defense and more on domestic programs and entitlements.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) Elected 1970, 18th term Rep. Rangel voted with the ACLU 94% of the time. Rangel consistently voted against free trade agreements, against the Bush tax cuts, against Pension Reform, and against Welfare Reform.

Rep. Rangel “opposed the Bush tax cuts and recently voted against free trade with tiny Oman. His committee's crucial health care subcommittee would be run by California's Pete Stark (1972), who in 1993 criticized Hillary Clinton's health care proposal because the government wasn't dominant enough.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

“No question about it.” -Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY), when asked whether tax increases across the spectrum would be considered should Democrats take control of Congress. (CongressDaily, 09/26/06)

Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) Elected 1964, 21st term Rep. Conyers voted with the AFL-CIO 100% and the ACLU 100% of the time. Conyers consistently voted against any liability reform, against the USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization, against REAL ID, against the Child Interstate Abortion Notification bill, and against Border Protection and Immigration Reform.

“He recently made his plans clear in a 370-page report… the report accuses the Administration of violating no fewer than 26 laws and regulations, and is a road map of Mr. Conyers's explicit intention to investigate grounds for impeaching President Bush.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) Elected 1955, 25th term Rep. Dingell voted with the AFL-CIO 100% of the time. Dingell voted against exploring for American-made energy in ANWR and OCS, against reforming the Endangered Species Act, and against the Telecom Reauthorization bill.

“The Michigan Congressman would do his best to provide taxpayer help to GM and Ford. But telecom companies would probably get more regulation in the form of Net neutrality rules, and a windfall profits tax on oil would be a real possibility.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) Elected 1974, 16th term Rep. Miller voted with the ACLU 95% of the time. Miller voted against Higher Education Reauthorization, against Head Start Reauthorization, and against Pension Reform.

Rep. Miller is “the chief sponsor of the ‘Employee Free Choice Act,’ which would make it much easier for unions to organize by largely banning secret elections… The Californian also wants to raise the minimum wage and fulfill the National Education Association wish to spend more federal dollars on local school construction.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) Elected 1980, 13th term Rep. Frank voted with the AFL-CIO 100% and the ACLU 95% of the time. Frank voted against the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention Act, against Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement, and against Credit Rating Reform.

“…the ascension of Barney Frank (1980) would mean a reprieve for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, despite $16 billion in accounting scandals. His main reform priority has been to carve out a new affordable housing fund from the two companies' profits. And forget about any major review of Sarbanes-Oxley.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) Elected 1974, 16th term Rep. Waxman voted with the AFL-CIO 100% and the ACLU 95% of the time. Waxman voted against the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act, against the formation of the Bipartisan Katrina Committee, and against 527 Reform.

Rep. Waxman “would compete with Mr. Conyers to see who could issue the most subpoenas to the Bush Administration.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

Intelligence Committee Chairman Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) Elected 1992, 7th term Rep. Hastings voted with the AFL-CIO 92% of the time. Hastings voted against declaring that the U.S. will prevail in the Global War on Terror, against the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act, against Supporting Terrorist Finance Tracking, against the USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization, and against Border Protection and Immigration Reform.

Rep. Hastings “who, should Ms. Pelosi succeed in pushing aside current ranking Member Jane Harman, would take over the House Intelligence Committee. Before he won his Florida seat in 1992, Mr. Hastings had been a federal judge who was impeached and convicted by a Democratic Congress for lying to beat a bribery rap. He would handle America's most vital national secrets.” (WSJ, 08/31/06)

*Group ratings are from 2004. Key votes are from the 108th and 109th Congress. Wall Street Journal quotes are extracted from “Back to the Congressional Future” editorial, August 31, 2006.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; pelosi; speakerpelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2006 11:13:11 AM PDT by PDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PDR

So what? Bush vetoes every one of these and they never pass the 2/3 majority for passage.


2 posted on 10/18/2006 11:21:38 AM PDT by steel_resolve (Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR

At least maybe Dubya would let his veto pen out for a little fresh air in the next two years.


3 posted on 10/18/2006 11:21:49 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR

It's time to turn on the afterburners. Newt is right - stay on message - and POUND Americans with TV commercials highlighting Dem lunacy. Pound them with the idiocy of DemocRAT party management, and moreso with the folly of Dem policy. We will CRUSH them in November if we can do one simple task here. This should even override the MainStream/gay media presence, if we do it.


4 posted on 10/18/2006 11:22:38 AM PDT by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Egads!


5 posted on 10/18/2006 11:22:40 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR
Gas Stamps? If people can't afford gasoline, how can they afford the cars in the first place?

-PJ

6 posted on 10/18/2006 11:23:53 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

Bush can veto?

Who knew?


7 posted on 10/18/2006 11:23:53 AM PDT by RabidBartender (an ex-fan of the Dixie Chicks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PDR

BTTT


8 posted on 10/18/2006 11:26:52 AM PDT by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
How many vetos has Bush used up till now steel? 1

No we don't allow the fire breathing communist Democrats the privelege of gaining power. We instead vote for Republicans and remind all our friends that are conservative to vote.

We all call ten friends to vote and tell them to call their conservative friends and we will win.


9 posted on 10/18/2006 11:27:15 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
So what? Bush vetoes every one of these and they never pass the 2/3 majority for passage.

Bush....vetos......ahh-ha-ha-ha! That is very funny! It took him 6 years just to learn how to spell it before he finally did one!

10 posted on 10/18/2006 11:31:26 AM PDT by Bommer (If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Typical Plantation Liberal who panders to the Communist base for raw power, but lives quite the life. Very, very wealthy in some cases from fairly questionable sources and a real lawbreaker in private life.


11 posted on 10/18/2006 11:33:11 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo; steel_resolve
FGS, it's time to take your blinders off. GWB's veto pen is not the answer to this. If he did as you both suggest the RAT'S would jump at the first chance they got and tie the President up in Impeachment procedures for the next two years. Everything would come to a standstill, our lives would be hell and our troops would be the ones to suffer the most.

The answer is for everyone to get their butts out and vote on November 7th and stop the RAT's in their tracks.

I just don't see why for some that's so difficult to understand.
12 posted on 10/18/2006 11:38:34 AM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
So what? Bush vetoes every one of these and they never pass the 2/3 majority for passage.

True, but his veto authority stops on Jan 20, 2009. Then President Clinton will sign these and a whole lot more into law. That's why I'm buying my AR-15 now. Because they won't be legal after she takes office.

13 posted on 10/18/2006 11:43:09 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PDR

ping for later


14 posted on 10/18/2006 11:43:20 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

that's probably yet another "stamp" program they forgot to tell us about..nothin less than a lexus for them..


15 posted on 10/18/2006 11:45:05 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (At 53, I'm the life of every party I go to, even if it lasts till 8 p.m...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
If people can't afford gasoline, how can they afford the cars in the first place?

Silly PJT. You don't want to deprive them po' folk of their right to drive-by shootings, do you?

16 posted on 10/18/2006 11:46:03 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
So what? Bush vetoes every one of these...

I'm sorry. "Bush" and "veto" are not words that have been used in the same breath since he was first sworn in. Hell, if he had it in him to veto anything, it should have been the McCain-Feingold abomination for starters.

Nope...Bush has shown he'll sign anything that lands on his desk.

17 posted on 10/18/2006 11:48:07 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit
FGS, I'm doing my part by voting for Rogers for the house, and Bouchard for Senate, but "Dangerously Incompetent" Debbie Stabenow is going to be reelected.


18 posted on 10/18/2006 11:48:54 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Man, this is really scary stuff. I fear this more than the return of Christ and Armaggedon!


19 posted on 10/18/2006 11:55:09 AM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

A LOT of people are working poor and drive real junkers. They need to work, and thank God they are instead of depending on welfare.


20 posted on 10/18/2006 11:56:24 AM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson