Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Bush Doctrine Dead?
HumanEventsOnline ^ | Oct 17, 2006 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 10/17/2006 11:17:19 AM PDT by NapkinUser

Between Sept. 11, 2001, and his State of the Union Address in 2002, George W. Bush had America in the palm of his hand.

But in that speech, Bush blew it. Singling out Iran, Iraq and North Korea as state sponsors of terror seeking weapons of mass destruction, Bush yoked them together in an "axis of evil" and issued this ultimatum: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons."

Neoconservatives celebrated this bellicosity as neo-Churchillian. Yet all it accomplished was to fracture the U.S. and foreign coalitions that had united behind Bush. As some of us wrote at the time, to call Iran and Iraq, mortal enemies in the eight-year war of the '80s that took a million lives, an "axis" was absurd.

Bush's speech was a blunder of the first magnitude. First, he had no authority to attack any of those nations, as Congress had not authorized war. Second, he had neither the plans nor forces in place to do so. Yet he had put all three on notice this was what he had in mind.

When the United States invaded Iraq, North Korea and Iran got the message. Both accelerated their nuclear programs.

By issuing public ultimatums, Bush left these regimes no way out. Even tiny Serbia felt its national honor required it to fight rather than submit to a U.S. ultimatum to let NATO march through the country to occupy Kosovo.

Now Kim Jong-Il, though his July 4 test of the Taepodong-2 missile seems to have Roman-candled and his plutonium bomb may have misfired, has openly defied the Bush Doctrine. Arguably the world's worst regime has acquired the world's worst weapon.

Bush's response? He went to the United Nations to plead for sanctions.

Will the sanctions work? Why should they? As columnist Tony Blankley has argued, this is a regime that, to ensure its isolation and ideological purity, allowed millions of its people to starve to death. The cruelties the Hermit Kingdom has imposed upon its own to guarantee that America will not be tempted to attack are astounding. This is not a crowd that will give up its atom bomb for BMWs.

Because of the bluster-and-bluff of President Bush, the United States is today eyeball-to-eyeball with Iran and North Korea over their nuclear programs, and neither of these regimes appears ready to blink.

Are we headed down the road again, as we were in the Balkans and Iraq, toward wars that will be even bigger and bloodier?

It need not happen, for the most basic of reasons. Neither Iran nor North Korea could survive all-out war with the United States, and neither has crossed any red line to start such a war.

What do these nations want, and can America accommodate them, without imperiling our security or accepting an intolerable loss of strategic credibility?

What North Korea wants is what President Nixon gave Mao Zedong in the 1970s. Recognition, security guarantees, aid, admission into the international community and an end to the U.S. policy of regime change.

What does America want from North Korea? No more atomic tests, the return of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors into all of North Korea's nuclear facilities and no export of nuclear materials to hostile states or non-state actors that could use nuclear devices as instruments of terror, mass murder or nuclear blackmail.

The six-party talks have failed. North Korea has rejected U.S. offers and resisted U.S. demands, and South Korea and China have balked at using their leverage to back us up. If Beijing and Seoul wish to play a separate hand with Pyongyang, we should play one, too.

We should engage in direct negotiations with the North, warning them that any export of a nuclear device to a hostile regime risks an attack by the United States and any nuclear weapon used against Americans, anywhere, traceable to North Korea will bring certain and massive nuclear retaliation.

However, in return for iron-clad assurances they have opened up all nuclear programs to inspection and given up further development of nuclear weapons, we should offer the North Koreans diplomatic ties, economic aid and a security pact sealed with a U.S. withdrawal of forces from the Korean peninsula.

Great though its crimes, Kim's regime will never equal in evil those of Josef Stalin or Mao, both of whom had nuclear arsenals greater than Kim can ever achieve -- and America never went to war with either.

Meanwhile, put the bellicose bluster on the shelf. It has done less than nothing to advance America's security.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bravosierra; buchanan; bushdoctrine; coughlinjunior; editorial; itspat; levinfanshatetruth; mullahpat; neoconsundermybed; patbuchanan; savagefanslikepat; ssdd; yes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2006 11:17:21 AM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

You'll need more than a napkin to wipe up this crap by Pat


2 posted on 10/17/2006 11:19:15 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Pat ... blow this !!!


3 posted on 10/17/2006 11:19:58 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

MSNBC last night -- a man had written a book analyzing the post cold war world and America's place/actions. He said, we have only ourselves to blame for the pickle we're in. To avoid 'Fortress America', we tried globalizing capitalism, spreading the wealth as it were, but this has failed. Yada Yada Yada...


4 posted on 10/17/2006 11:20:45 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
As some of us wrote at the time, to call Iran and Iraq, mortal enemies in the eight-year war of the '80s that took a million lives, an "axis" was absurd.

Iran and Iraq to Exchange Intelligence - a headline from *today*. Pat's a moron, though for many more reasons than this.

5 posted on 10/17/2006 11:21:25 AM PDT by xjcsa (John McCain: sacrificing the lives of American women and children to save American soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

The author of that book wasn't Pat.


6 posted on 10/17/2006 11:21:37 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Hell, I thought it was a great speech.


7 posted on 10/17/2006 11:21:38 AM PDT by RexBeach (Will Rogers Never Met Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

More rabid stupidity from the Know Nothings. Sorry but no one here buys the "We need to run away and hide under our beds" Neo Isolationist ignorance from the Buchannanites.

We followed this dogma all thru the 1980s and 1990s, we got 09-11-01 for it. Too bad Pat Buchannan is too arrogantly ignorant to grasp the reality that his political dogma is DEAD. It dies 09-11-01


8 posted on 10/17/2006 11:22:11 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
I detest Buchanan, but to the question, I do think the Bush Doctrine is dead.

Bush was on with O'Reilly last night saying that Iran's involvement with the Iraqi insurgency was "troubling" to him. It should be an considered an act of war.

9 posted on 10/17/2006 11:23:45 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Islam came up with "Zero" to describe the rest of their creative output)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Well of course. MSNBC is the bottom of the rating heap because they keep giving creditility to tin foil hat wearing complete ignorants like the author you cite. As usual the Neo Isolationists are completely divorced from any sort of grasp of reality.


10 posted on 10/17/2006 11:23:51 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: digger48

The only thing dead here is Pat Buchannan's crediblity.


11 posted on 10/17/2006 11:25:38 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Is the Bush Doctrine Dead? No.
Is Pat Buchanan brain dead? Yes, absolutely and it has been dead for a very long time.


12 posted on 10/17/2006 11:26:41 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

No, it's not dead, but it's Springtime In Germany.


13 posted on 10/17/2006 11:28:21 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Nuke weapons, terror groups seeking to attack via stealth.....is Pat living the 50's or what?

It's breath taking how we expect to evoke revolutionary changes overnight. This is an evolutionary process that we must encourage over decades....can our microwave society get a clue or should we just bag it because it won't come in a vacuum sealed pouch ready for instant serving?

in addition why does the Bush doctrine require one method to enforce? Why not the the 2 steps forward one step back utilizing the terrorist method of patience and determination over a long period of time?

I suggest that Pat is a simplistic, one note thinker if he seriously (which I doubt) buys his own argument.

14 posted on 10/17/2006 11:40:12 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
However, in return for iron-clad assurances they have opened up all nuclear programs to inspection and given up further development of nuclear weapons, we should offer the North Koreans...

...absolutely nothing at all, a precisely equivalent value. Though most of this article is pretty good - the indictment of the failed Bush Doctrine is sound - he blew it completely in the conclusion. The only doctrine to apply is the proven Reagan Doctrine.

15 posted on 10/17/2006 11:40:13 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Is the Bush Doctrine Dead? No. Is Pat Buchanan brain dead? Yes, absolutely and it has been dead for a very long time.

Truth bump! 

16 posted on 10/17/2006 11:42:39 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Isn't this Headline Dead?
I have seen this headline or some variation of it 100 times now.
Paging Dr. Dean....Dr. Demento... The media needs a new template ASAP.


17 posted on 10/17/2006 11:46:53 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Singling out Iran, Iraq and North Korea as state sponsors of terror seeking weapons of mass destruction, Bush yoked them together in an "axis of evil" and issued this ultimatum: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons."

The most ridiculous thing about this statement was that North Korea was only added to this "axis of evil" because the Bush administration didn't want to sound like it was singling out Islamic countries.

18 posted on 10/17/2006 11:57:59 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
"You'll need more than a napkin to wipe up this crap by Pat

Mop on isle 3!

19 posted on 10/17/2006 12:13:23 PM PDT by paulcissa (Only YOU can prevent liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Because of the bluster-and-bluff of President Bush, the United States is today eyeball-to-eyeball with Iran and North Korea over their nuclear programs, and neither of these regimes appears ready to blink

I like Pat's stands on some issues. This is not one of them. Neither the Iranian nor North Korean nuclear programs were born as a result of the speech given by President Bush. Pat needs to clean his glasses, his ears, then look and listen again. Then again, maybe Pat just needs to stop blinking.
20 posted on 10/17/2006 12:14:50 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson