Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 15 October 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 15 October 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 10/15/2006 5:08:28 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, October 15th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton; Republican Rep. Mark Kennedy and Democrat Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota candidates for U.S. Senate.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; Sen. John Warner, R-Va.; former Sen. Sam Nunn, co-chairman of the Nuclear Threat Initiative.

THIS WEEK (ABC): U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton; Democratic Rep. Harold Ford Jr. and Republican Bob Corker, Tennessee candidates for U.S. Senate; actress and voting activist Marg Helgenberger.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton; Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean and Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman; Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lineup; meetthepress; news; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561-568 next last
To: Mo1

I'm surprised he hasn't poked him yet.


101 posted on 10/15/2006 6:22:38 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Now he's praising Carter and his agreement with N. Korea

Could Kerry really be that stupid??


102 posted on 10/15/2006 6:22:44 AM PDT by Mo1 (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
The Midterm elections will be all about TURNOUT, and the GOP has shown in the last few election cycles that they are good at this facet of politics. Some historical trends show that turnout will likely be below 50%. Of course this will be higher in locations with hotter races going on:


103 posted on 10/15/2006 6:22:47 AM PDT by RobFromGa (Monthly donors rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

FNS

Kerry may have to accuse Wallace of 'smirking'.

Kerry doesn't like Wallace's questions and assertions.

Kerry: "This is not political."

Even Chris gagged at that statement.



104 posted on 10/15/2006 6:23:03 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
See, I am right! Kerry makes my blood pressure go up. I think I loathe him more than Gore, who after all, served LONGER in Vietnam than did Kerry and at least didn't trash the military on his return.

I loathe Kerry more than Clinton, even.

105 posted on 10/15/2006 6:23:21 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Freeped.

Which US Senate candidate would bring more jobs to the state? Conrad Burns 6513 votes (33%) Stan Jones 435 votes (2%) Jon Tester 12545 votes (64%) 19493 total votes

106 posted on 10/15/2006 6:24:08 AM PDT by defconw (Gearing up for W2 in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

Which is why turnout is even more critical in the mid terms.


107 posted on 10/15/2006 6:24:24 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

Oh geez, Tim is all over Kennedy OVER IRAQ. Tim makes it quite clear that anything good Kennedy said about Iraq is just dead wrong and Kennedy is an idiot. This Kennedy guy is not to bad. He manages to keep bringing it back to the differences between him and Klobuchar.


Timmy tries the "if you knew then what you know now" trick. Kennedy says you cannot rewind. We acted correctly on the info we had then. Stands by his vote. Good answer.


108 posted on 10/15/2006 6:24:47 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Kerry needs to establish his anti-Fox credentials with the moonbats.


109 posted on 10/15/2006 6:25:01 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

LOL.


110 posted on 10/15/2006 6:25:15 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: anita
Great stuff as usual Anita!
I was particularly interested in the secure fence initiative which I am certain will be singed soon by the President.
There has been a lot of brouhaha about the fence.
I even conjectured yesterday on EC's radio show that while the bill will be signed, will it be funded?
I have since seen new info that leads me to believe that it will be funded contrary to previous opinions I have had. Its here:

http://frontpagemagazine.com/articles/readarticle.asp?id=24909

After reading what Michael Reagan had to say courtesy of David Horowitz I have had a change of mind on this issue and now hope more than ever that at least the 700 miles that are promised will be funded and built.

Reagan says he called Rep. Duncan Hunter who says the special language in the bill(which was used by the WaPost to demagogue the entire issue claiming it was only there to make sure the fence never got funded) says the language is designed to make sure the fence is built; not make sure it doesn't get built as the Wapost says.
With a choice between believing Reagan/Horowitz or the WaPost I will take Reagan every time. Hunter went on the say that the bill states,
"it says flatly that it shall be built"
Hunter goes on to clarify that the special language in the bill was put there to make sure the fence can be built "around buildings instead of through buildings."
Sounds good to me...how soon can they start.

In addition to the 700 miles of fencing I am still encouraging those patriots in the Minute Men org. that want to help border landowners build their own fences to continue on. Time is of the essence. Evey day we allow undesirables to come into the country (and I am not talking about those wayward elephants and Mariachi bands either)we become more endangered,IMHO.
111 posted on 10/15/2006 6:25:35 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; mainepatsfan
Could Kerry really be that stupid??

It's not stupidity, I fear. John Jacques Strap Effin Shove It Maria Teresa Thierstein Simoes Ferreira Kerry is just a trained Democrat lying dog!

112 posted on 10/15/2006 6:25:56 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( Either hold your nose on Election Day ......... or grab your ankles for the next few years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

What proceeds the / was sarcastic. ;)


113 posted on 10/15/2006 6:26:03 AM PDT by defconw (Gearing up for W2 in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

The DBM keeps insisting the Pubbies are going to lose; however, it appears Rove and the President feel differently:

White House Upbeat About GOP Prospects [Bush, Rove 'almost inexplicably upbeat']
Washington Post ^ | October 15, 2006 | Michael Abramowitz

Posted on 10/14/2006 8:23:22 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Amid widespread panic in the Republican establishment about the coming midterm elections, there are two people whose confidence about GOP prospects strikes even their closest allies as almost inexplicably upbeat: President Bush and his top political adviser, Karl Rove.

Some Republicans on Capitol Hill are bracing for losses of 25 House seats or more. But party operatives say Rove is predicting that, at worst, Republicans will lose only 8 to 10 seats -- shy of the 15-seat threshold that would cede control to Democrats for the first time since the 1994 elections and probably hobble the balance of Bush's second term.

In the Senate, Rove and associates believe, a Democratic victory would require the opposition to "run the table," as one official put it, to pick up the necessary six seats -- a prospect the White House seems to regard as nearly inconceivable.

The Mark Foley page scandal and its fallout have many Republicans panicked, but Rove professes to be taking it in stride. "The data we are seeing from individual races and the national polls would tend to indicate that people can divorce Foley's personal action from the party," he said in a brief interview Thursday.

The official White House line of supreme self-assurance comes from the top down. Bush has publicly and privately banished any talk of losing the GOP majorities, in part to squelch any loss of nerve among his legions. Come January, he said last week, "We'll have a Republican speaker and a Republican leader of the Senate."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1719603/posts


114 posted on 10/15/2006 6:26:15 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Kerry ... I was for the 87 million if we paid for it and had a plan


??????????


115 posted on 10/15/2006 6:26:34 AM PDT by Mo1 (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Bolton was masterful. He thinks and speaks clearly (well, as clearly as being a diplomat will allow). It is like watching Cassius Clay in the ring with a kindergartner.


116 posted on 10/15/2006 6:26:37 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

FNS:

Kerry: I voted for the Iraq war resolution, before I voted against it. Bush mislead them.

[Amazing that Kerry and the other libDems were so gullible. Maybe, John, had you attended some of those Intel Committee meetings -- that you were co-chair of, but failed to attend -- you might have known what was going on in the world.]

Kerry: "...plan..." [drroink]


117 posted on 10/15/2006 6:27:09 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I loathe Kerry more than Clinton, even.

Oh ...... let's just call it a tie.

;-)

118 posted on 10/15/2006 6:27:16 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( Either hold your nose on Election Day ......... or grab your ankles for the next few years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

Oh honey, "republicans in big trouble" is the MSM's middle name. And the sky is falling too! If we hear it long enough, and loud enough, we will just stay home on Nov 7th, in the fetal position! That's the way it's supposed to go, the reason why the MSM and Democrats keep on pumping the possibilities. Self-serving republican candidates aren't helping either, but then, their middle name is "Coward".

You asked if that's the way I feel. Well....I watch a lot of TV, so sometimes gloom and doom overtakes. I'm (realistically, I think), worried we will lose the House. But losing the House won't affect judicial appointments for the next 2 years, and isn't enough to allow for the impeachment of George Bush, with a lump in my throat, I can handle this loss.

When I start thinking we could lose the Senate too, I switch to AMC and TCM. And...........I ask.........If Democrats are so damn sure they will win it all in Nov, why are they already complaining about voting machines andd hiring lawyers to challenge results?


119 posted on 10/15/2006 6:27:31 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Kerry is making a fool of himself on FNS. He is saying we have no credibility because we go it alone, the unanimous support for the NK resolution is meaningless because this President has turned against our allies (or something like this). Everything is Bush's fault; he calls the NOKO bomb the "Bush bomb" in a speech, and Chris replays it on the air. He is beyond pathetic; typical blame america firster. This administration is the cut and run administration....LOL. Chris lets him get away with way too much, imho. The Condi connection was bad, and I missed a lot of what she had to say.


120 posted on 10/15/2006 6:27:38 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561-568 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson