Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

South Korean environmentalists chant anti-U.S. slogans near the U.S. embassy in Seoul, April 2, 2001. Their demands: that the Bush administration support the 1997 Kyoto Agreement on greenhouse gas reductions. Yun Suk-bong

Anti-Americanism is growing in South Korea after two U.S. soldiers charged with negligent homicide in the road deaths of two Korean teenage schoolgirls were acquitted by U.S. military courts last month

1 posted on 10/13/2006 3:43:05 AM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Flavius
South Korean protesters shout a slogan during a rally opposing the inauguration of U.S. President George W. Bush near the U.S. Embassy in Seoul Thursday, Jan. 20, 2005. Protesters demanded the withdrawal of the U.S and South Korean troops in Iraq. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon).
2 posted on 10/13/2006 3:43:43 AM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

demand, huh?


3 posted on 10/13/2006 3:53:40 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

What a spoiled rotten bunch the South Koreans are! We've protected these bums long enough. There is no way anyone can protect Seoul from missile attack when it is 25 miles from the NK border. They are extremely fortunate that we have had thousands of US troops there for 50 years (another Democrat war with no exit strategy), and if they keep "demanding" stuff, we should pull our military out and let those loud mouths fend for themselves. Their worthless, long-haired "youth" are always wanting to be re-unified with the North, and one of these fine years, we should let them.


4 posted on 10/13/2006 3:59:00 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Surely this can't be the same South Korea which has been having anti-US riots now and again?

I know those "America go home" signs and "Evil Bush" placards have just filled me with a warm and fuzzy desire to protect them from the monster under the bed.

We should heavily arm Japan then tell the Koreans (north and south) to go F#@! off.

(Maybe I'd better go get another cup of coffee.)

6 posted on 10/13/2006 4:01:20 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Japan should tell China in no uncertain terms that they have 30 days to take care of their Chia pet problem or they are fully arming themselves with thermonuclear weapons that will be pointed east north east.
7 posted on 10/13/2006 4:01:20 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Give SK nukes...then let them duke it out with NK.
8 posted on 10/13/2006 4:03:07 AM PDT by Dallas59 (Muslims Are Only Guests In Western Countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Yea yea, same old story - "demand" our help when it fits into their picture, but otherwise play the anti-American card in their national politics. The adage "The more things change the more they are the same" does appear to apply, doesn't it?

But in S. Korea's defense, generally speaking, they do carry their weight and are consistent. South Korea has troops in Iraq, they fought along our side in Vietnam and took substantial losses there. You will always find one or two protesters that are against this or that and the antagonist who like with the crushing of the S. Korean girl years ago from a M88 (An horrible accident) will exploit the situation to bolster their political position. Cheap politics can be found everywhere, even in the US.


9 posted on 10/13/2006 4:05:02 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Time for South Korea to stop its appeasement policy towards the North and if it refuses then pull our troops out.
Are there still import duties of up to %400 for American products entering the South?
Let's see that means if you are a South Korean and want say a Harley Davidson that here costs $25,000, There you'd have to pay $100,000. Gee that seems fair.
Protect their asses and get shaken down.


11 posted on 10/13/2006 4:06:55 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
I'd be willing to pitch in for a new clear umbrella.


12 posted on 10/13/2006 4:07:33 AM PDT by edpc (Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

The old Nike Hercules would be the perfect weapon to put in there. The range is about right and with a ground to ground plug it could hit the Chia Pet almost anywhere he needed hitting. We must have a few old ones left lying around somewhere.


14 posted on 10/13/2006 4:12:59 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
I guess it could be a good idea....even though the South Koreans have a lot of gall for asking.

Most of all, I think we should give short range missiles with nuclear warheads to Taiwan. Such an offer to Taiwan might encourage China to exert more pressure on NK.

17 posted on 10/13/2006 4:27:55 AM PDT by syriacus (Pelosi, 1998 - "It's about sex. It's about a punishment searching for a crime that doesn't exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

This is why it is wise for Bush to let NK's neighbors take some responsibility.

They would like nothing better than to let the US come in, then they sit back, do nothing, but criticize and cheap shot America.


20 posted on 10/13/2006 4:43:30 AM PDT by tkathy (The Real Republican (RR) way is sticking to the issues and not finger pointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

The nuclear shield won't help Seoul which can be reduced to rubble in a matter of hours by all of NK's artillery positions currently honed in on it.


21 posted on 10/13/2006 4:52:05 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
This was part of the settlement after a more junior Mr Rumsfeld was Washington's envoy, who "thumped the table" to stop Seoul from pursuing an independent nuclear capability.

Oh I get it... because Rumsfeld "thumped the table" over South Korea getting nukes, it is all our fault.

24 posted on 10/13/2006 5:19:54 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Guess we'll look at Fprd trucks instead of Hyundais...


26 posted on 10/13/2006 5:28:37 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (They Took My Saddle in Houston, Broke My Leg in Sante Fe, Lost Wife + Girlfriend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
S Korea demands US nuclear shield-(demand?)

Isn't this what always precedes flag burning because of our militant foreign policy?

27 posted on 10/13/2006 5:30:52 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Man defiles a rock when he chips it with a tool. Ex 20:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
S Korea demands US nuclear shield-(demand?)

Oh reary?

28 posted on 10/13/2006 5:32:02 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Man defiles a rock when he chips it with a tool. Ex 20:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Offer to sell 'em Patriots.
And pack up our armed forces in Korea and move 'em home.


30 posted on 10/13/2006 5:38:18 AM PDT by Little Ray (If you want to be a martyr, we want to martyr you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Mr Yoon would seek detailed information on how the US planned to respond to various levels of threat and the types of tactical nuclear weapons to be used in different cases

Not a chance! Demanding a defense shield is bold enough, but to ask for when/where/how the US will use nuclear weapons is beyond bold in my opinion. No future US President is going to want to be bound by what happens in 2006 with respect to using nukes.

36 posted on 10/13/2006 5:58:17 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
"Anti-Americanism is growing in South Korea"

But they want a nuclear umbershoot from the United States.

40 posted on 10/13/2006 6:09:15 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson