Posted on 10/12/2006 12:00:49 AM PDT by tcrlaf
A U.S. based environmental magazine that both former Vice President Al Gore (http://gristmill.grist.org/print/2006/9/19/11408/1106?show_comments=no ) and PBS newsman Bill Moyers, for his October 11th global warming edition of “Moyers on America” titled “Is God Green?” have deemed respectable enough to grant one-on-one interviews to promote their projects, is now advocating Nuremberg-style war crimes trials for skeptics of human caused catastrophic global warming.
Grist Magazine’s staff writer David Roberts called for the Nuremberg-style trials for the “bastards” who were members of what he termed the global warming “denial industry.”
Roberts wrote in the online publication on September 19, 2006, "When we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we're in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these bastards -- some sort of climate Nuremberg.”
(Snip) The article Global Warming: The Chilling Effect On Free Speech last week in Spiked Online addresses this new found penchant by environmentalists and some media members to charge skeptics of human caused catastrophic global warming with “crimes against humanity” and urge Nuremberg-style prosecution of them.
(Links removed from text)
(Excerpt) Read more at epw.senate.gov ...
Now it's a "Crime Against Humanity" if you don't buy into the Liberal-Approved Global Warming Script....
So Al Gore of the Democratic Party promotes trials and imprisonment and possibly execution if you don't believe in his globull excretment...Please come and get me.
If you read who beleives in man made global warming, you'll find "scientists". Those who disagree are "climatologists". Weatherman cannot predict what the weather will be five days in advance. But scientists can predict the weather years in advance. How many hurricanes have we had this year, Albore?
I only wish it was....
I read MANY articles in the Mid-80's that stated that Socialism's hope for the future lay in co-opting the Radical World Environmental Movement, after the Fall of the Soviet Union...
After all, only a Global Socialist Dictatorship would truly have the POWER to save the Planet from itself...
You are starting to see that come to fruition now, as the 60's/70's environmentalists are now in thier 60/70's, rich, and powerful...
1.)Take all the guns away.
You've lost already.
But will they put panties on my head if I don't confess?
I remember reading somewhere in the mid-80's that "Environmentalism is the New Socialism". I don't remember where that quote came from though...
Basicly it stated that World Domination by Communist Ideology could only happen now though the justification of "Saving Ourselves", and Radical Environmentalism would be the vehicle for it...
Here is a blurb from a website called "Socialist Action":
Introduction: We stand firmly in opposition to the destruction of the environment.
We believe that the scourge of pollution, depletion of resources and degradation of our natural environment is primarily the result of the reckless policies of profit driven capitalism, and the shortsighted consumerism that it fosters.
We believe that under socialism - through a rational, democratically controlled planned economy - we will be able to make decisions that can stop and reverse the destruction of the environment.
We support efforts to save what remains of our natural environment, re-tool industry to use sustainable fuels, resources and production practices, and to break down the artificial and debilitating divisions between the labor and environmental movements.
Below is a list of articles and resolutions from Socialist Action, YSA and the Fourth International, as well as a collection of links to other websites with information about ecology and the environmental movement. "
To use a Babs Striesand euphemism, "Shut the f---up".
I didn't expect a bloody inquisition.
No, he was just interviewed by the rag.
This is very worrying and relys on the oldest trick in the book that when you indoctrinate people with fear then you have control over them.
The earth has been warming and coiling for millions of years and the default in the current epoch is 90% glacial and 10% interglacial. There may be good arguments suggesting AGW playing a role but this whole issue now is about shutting down debate altogether which is about as dangerous as it can get!!...
If these psychophant liberals have their way, then heaven help us.....run to the hills!!!
Al Gore and Bill Moyers should both live in a tepee, with no campfire alowed. If it gets too cold, they can rub their legs together like crickets.
Watermelons. Green on the outside. Red on the inside. Environmentalism is the new home for rabid communists.
I dislike the term environmentalism being applied to such people - I consider myself an environmentalist; I want to see the environment sustained so future generations can enjoy what we have.
On the other hand, I certainly don't support propaganda which hasn't been proved one way or the other. Cutting down on oil, yes. (But that's more so that when we eventually run out, it doesn't cause another Great Depression). Forcing countries to adapt to standards, while ruining people's lives because of something that is still up in the air? Hell, no.
Scary stuff. It won't end with the environmental issue either. As we know from the way these people operate, often through fear, intimidation, and outright violence, we could see all kinds of "re-education" institutions appear if they were ever to obtain complete power.
This is why we have the right to bear arms. Should these wackos continue with their threats, our duties as citizens in the US will have a clear directive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.