Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator fights the tide, calls warming by humans a hoax
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/11/6 | Zachary Coile

Posted on 10/11/2006 8:09:47 AM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: pissant

Part of this is the belief that man always messes everything up, including paradise (Garden of Eden). Yet, it seems grandiose to believe that man could totally ruin a planet. Is there conclusive scientific proof?


21 posted on 10/11/2006 9:12:54 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This warming spell began when the North American ice sheet began to melt. There wasn't a factory or an SUV in sight.

End of discussion.


22 posted on 10/11/2006 9:38:41 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

You go, Senator!!!


23 posted on 10/11/2006 9:52:08 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
"In the judgment of most climate scientists, Earth's warming in recent decades has been caused primarily by human activities that have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere."

They could have said opinion but judgment sounded more official. Do we pay scientists to be judges, politicians, and opinion writers?

Scientific proof requires double-blind experiments with a control. These experiments must be repeatable and the cause and effect relationship must be provable and strong to be of use. CO2 levels rising 0.1% over several hundred years, from 0.28 to 0.38%, is not significant enough to be entirely responsible for a 5% increase in temperature.

We are short on experiments that show us the optimum temperature to support quality of human life. That setting is likely warmer than it is today. And we are short on how to inexpensively make white reflecting clouds and snow to actively manage where and when the Sun's energy heats the surface. Why do we spend billions on detecting a tiny amount of global warming and very little on technologies that can manage the climate?

Climate management technologies will eventually be funded by the Department of Defense. They will never come from scientists or the UN. If we could induce a directed hurricane we could do more damage to North Korea than an atomic bomb.

24 posted on 10/11/2006 9:55:07 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

Living in Seattle I always view it in terms of "do I want palm trees or 1 mile of ice piled up in my backyard?" Its amazing to think that not too long ago there WAS about a mile of ice over my head!


25 posted on 10/11/2006 10:04:32 AM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

"Living in Seattle I always view it in terms of "do I want palm trees or 1 mile of ice piled up in my backyard?" Its amazing to think that not too long ago there WAS about a mile of ice over my head!"

This is a non-sequiter, but whenever we travel I always express my preference for places with palm trees. When I found out we were going to Alaska on a cruise, I said NO NO! That's the wrong direction. I want to go SOUTH! Lets go to the Caribbean.

Well, we began our cruise in Vancouver, and there in the median were 6 or 8 palm trees in two rows. The sightseeing guide said, "'Course, they don't grow very fast here. In fact, they haven't gotten any bigger during my lifetime".

One more thing: Our next trip was to London, England in February. Yup - there were a couple of live palm trees outside a pub in downtown London. I have travelled so far only to places where there are palm trees. :-)


26 posted on 10/11/2006 11:10:13 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

27 posted on 02/20/2007 10:34:37 AM PST by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene

I can only imagine what 2010 will bring us.


28 posted on 02/20/2007 11:00:19 AM PST by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: what's up

What did O'Brian say that?

CA....


29 posted on 02/20/2007 11:14:31 AM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
Remember how settled the science was in the build-up to the Y2K scare? Worse yet, it's foregone conclusion would be manifest on a date certain, just to drive the point home.

Refresh my memory - how'd that turn out?

CA....
30 posted on 02/20/2007 11:20:22 AM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson