Skip to comments.
Dems Object To Freeh Leading Probe (Pelosi Galore Alert) (Foley)
cbsnews.com ^
| 10/5/06
| unknown
Posted on 10/06/2006 2:58:02 AM PDT by beyond the sea
Pelosi: Former FBI Director Wrong Man To Lead Page Program Investigation
(AP) House Speaker Dennis Hastert said Thursday he is looking for a high-caliber figure to step in and fix flaws in the congressional page program that left the teenagers vulnerable to sexual advances.
Hastert was on the verge of naming former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who boasts a long, high-profile career in law enforcement, for the post. But the speaker held off because of objections from Democrats.
Hastert had called House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi on Thursday to notify her that he intended to hire Freeh to overhaul the program, their aides said. But Pelosi suggested it was too soon to make decisions about changing the program, and that Freeh might be the wrong man for the job.
That's about public relations for the Republican leaders, it's not about protecting the children, Pelosi, D-Calif., said in an interview with The Associated Press. It smacks of 'blame the victim.'"
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foley; freeh; hastert; pelosi; pussygalorepelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: beyond the sea
But Pelosi suggested it was too soon to make decisions about changing the program, and that Freeh might be the wrong man for the job. Translation: We want the GOP to look like they're doing nothing until after the election.
81
posted on
10/06/2006 6:45:23 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(War is not about proportionality. Knitting is about proportionality. War is about winning.)
To: beyond the sea
That's about public relations for the Republican leaders, it's not about protecting the children, Pelosi, D-Calif., said in an interview with The Associated Press. It smacks of 'blame the victim.'"
Yeah. As if San Fran Nan actually cares about "the children." Correct me if I'm wrong, but she's in favor of allowing two homosexuals to buy a child (gay "adoption"), and the homo-ification of the Boy Scouts, right?
82
posted on
10/06/2006 6:48:06 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
To: beyond the sea
Nancy wouldn't try to stall, would she?
To: PghBaldy
Pgh................ cool!
84
posted on
10/06/2006 7:05:29 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: rwfromkansas
85
posted on
10/06/2006 7:06:21 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: Antoninus
Yep................ she's probably looking at "sex with animals" next.
86
posted on
10/06/2006 7:07:25 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: jennyjenny
Nancy wouldn't try to stall, would she?LOL
She belongs in a stall.
87
posted on
10/06/2006 7:08:15 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: beyond the sea
If Hastert and the GOP knuckle under to Pelosi on this, they deserve to lose the House (though I hope America doesn't deserve that tragedy).
The obvious reason Pelosi doesn't want this investigation to go through is that she's covering up the Democrats' sitting on the salacious emails until October 2006, leaving the pages at risk.
88
posted on
10/06/2006 10:06:24 AM PDT
by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: beyond the sea
Bump for the hilarious "Pelosi Galore Alert"!
To: mnehrling
What is Pelosi trying to hide if she doesn't want the FBI involved? Smells as bad as her face lift looks... I keep saying this stinks to high heaven of having dem hands all over it, now that they don't want the FBI involved in it, it just confirms my suspicions.Exactly.
So what is the status of this? Is Hastert's press conference announcement just to be flushed down the toilet, because pretty Nancy doesn't like it?
If so, then Hastert must be a dolt.
90
posted on
10/06/2006 10:14:01 AM PDT
by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: unspun
Exactamundo!!!!!!!!!!!
91
posted on
10/06/2006 10:21:12 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: Diddle E. Squat
Pelosi Galore............... sweet!
;-)
92
posted on
10/06/2006 10:23:26 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: beyond the sea
93
posted on
10/06/2006 10:28:12 AM PDT
by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: unspun
94
posted on
10/06/2006 10:31:19 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
To: unspun
Hastert is no Dolt. I'm sure he knows 2-3 steps ahead where this is going.
When you are strong, appear weak.
When you are weak, appear strong.
- Sun Tzu, The Art of War.
95
posted on
10/06/2006 10:31:26 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
To: beyond the sea
So Nancy the Protector HOW do you protect the children.... "Don't ask - Don't Tell" did not work.
To: beyond the sea
Who gives a damn what Nancy thinks???
Get Louie in there and let him go to work!
Seems Nancy wants to make sure the only acceptable investigator is one who would outlaw Republicans.
97
posted on
10/06/2006 10:39:18 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: mnehrling; beyond the sea
Hastert is no Dolt. I'm sure he knows 2-3 steps ahead where this is going. Do you mean that you know he is going to go forward with the independent investigation?
98
posted on
10/06/2006 10:42:11 AM PDT
by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: unspun
I think we haven't seen the crux of this story. I believe he wanted Pelosi's comment not wanting the FBI to be on record.. just as we've seen in the past few days, a lot of new stuff is coming out and it isn't pretty for the Dems..
Don't fall into the trap the dems are trying to make this which is it is about Hastert. That is nothing but obfuscation.
99
posted on
10/06/2006 11:05:30 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
To: beyond the sea
Nancy you stretched face goon.....there are no children involved in this affair.
100
posted on
10/06/2006 11:30:57 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Foley is why we don't allow queers to be Scoutmasters.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson