Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three More Former Pages Accuse Foley of Online Sexual Approaches
ABC News Blog ^

Posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:06 PM PDT by mmyers

Three more former congressional pages have come forward to reveal what they call "sexual approaches" over the Internet from former Congressman Mark Foley.

The pages served in the classes of 1998, 2000 and 2002. They independently approached ABC News after the Foley resignation through the Brian Ross & the Investigative Team's tip line on ABCNews.com. None wanted their names used because of the sensitive nature of the communications.

"I was seventeen years old and just returned to [my home state] when Foley began to e-mail me, asking if I had ever seen my page roommates naked and how big their penises were," said the page in the 2002 class.

The former page also said Foley told him that if he happened to be in Washington, D.C., he could stay at Foley's home if he "would engage in oral sex" with Foley.

THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS READER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Foley's Exchange with Underage Page Foley Instant Message Chat While Waiting for a House Vote Click Here to Watch This Week's Brian Ross Investigates Webcast The page told ABC News he was interviewed this week by FBI agents who had a six-page list of questions about Foley and the exchanges.

The second page who talked with ABC News, a graduate of the 2000 page class, says Foley actually visited the old page dorm and offered rides to events in his BMW.

"His e-mails developed into sexually explicit conversations, and he asked me for photographs of my erect penis," the former page said.

The page said Foley maintained e-mail contact with him even after he started college and arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned 18.

The third page interviewed by ABC News, a graduate of the 1998 page class, said Foley's instant messages began while he was a senior in high school.

"Foley would say he was sitting in his boxers and ask what I was wearing," the page said.

"It became more weird, and I stopped responding," the page said.

All three pages described similar instant message and e-mail patterns, with remarkably similar escalations of provocative questions.

"He didn't want to talk about politics," the page said. "He wanted to talk about sex or my penis," the page said.

The three new verbal accounts are in addition to two sets of sexually explicit instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages.

An online story on the Drudge Report Thursday claimed one set of the sexually explicit instant messages obtained by ABC News was part of a "prank" on the part of the former page, who reportedly says he goaded the congressman into writing the messages.

"This was no prank," said one of the three former pages who talked to ABC News today about his experience with the congressman.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcfrenzy; classaction; foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-338 next last
To: Bigh4u2
Where are the emails or IM's?

This time I'm sure ABC will be sure to leave off the source so that no one will do the fact checking they 'fail' to do...that is IF these statements are even true.

41 posted on 10/05/2006 2:54:09 PM PDT by batter ("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

I'm not saying Foley wasn't. But ABC is trying to get the focus off of the who knew what when angle that is quickly becoming big and back onto the Republicans are all preditors angle.


42 posted on 10/05/2006 2:54:13 PM PDT by CougarGA7 (This tag line will be commercial free for the remainder of this thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

I call BS. Do the "victims" have any proof? I doubt it. It's time for the Repubs to play hardball. We need to figure out who these "victims" are and find out what their angle is.


43 posted on 10/05/2006 2:54:28 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

Wow. This is all so frightening that the media will deliver stuff like this to the masses w/out any proof. The media is unfreakinbelievable. I will NEVER believe a word they say. The media is the anti-christ or form of it!


44 posted on 10/05/2006 2:54:57 PM PDT by newconhere (bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. zap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

What now? These former pages need to come forward to the FBI's investigation. Not just ABC news.


45 posted on 10/05/2006 2:55:24 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter ("And you got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mmyers
The pages served in the classes of 1998, 2000 and 2002.

And who was the Speaker of the House in those years? Dig him up and let's fire him, too!

46 posted on 10/05/2006 2:55:30 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmyers
I am starting to think something might be a bit wrong with this Foley guy. I'm not convinced yet though, maybe, if ABC can find some more dramatic accounts I might be. (sarcasm)

Geez, OK, ABC - you've established he's a creep. Why don't you tell us something we don't know, like who had the IM's and sat on them until a few weeks before a major election!
47 posted on 10/05/2006 2:55:58 PM PDT by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

I wonder when the media is going to start calling out ABC on the drip drip drip way they are doing this. IT see unprofesional to me.


48 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:14 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Geaux Tigers SEC FOOTBALL ROCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

Actually, I spoke to one former (male) page who said that Brian Ross had sex with him in the back seat of Ross' car in New York City when the page was 17, but he really didn't want his name used, so I can't tell it to you. But trust me, I wouldn't say such a thing on the Internet unless it were completely, 100% true...


49 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:16 PM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

CNN.com has a statement from the family of the page who got the e-mails. The family says they did not know of the IM's.


50 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:19 PM PDT by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Huh? The initial poster has been here longer than you.

The "Key Identifying Feature" of a troll is that they signed up recently.


51 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:25 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
One of them seems to suggest that he's so obviously gay Foley just couldn't pass him up.

Not sure I believe anything a homosexual says about sex ~ they all want to talk about their rectums for one thing.

52 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
But the thing is, this Congessman WAS a textbook-case pervert, and apparently many leaders in his party knew that and didn't much care about it, just so long as he could win elections.

And you know that the leadership knew how?

Please explain DNC basement rat.

53 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:32 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Are they all over 18, as well?

We saw no ages listed, so that's pretty indicative they were, eh?

54 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:50 PM PDT by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mmyers
If they were sure of the validity of these they would have waited until closure to the election to reveal
55 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:54 PM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

But....if they go back to the Republicans are predators, and in this case, Foley was a homosexual predator, then they are emphasizing an angle of the story that the gay community won't like, the stereotype of predatory gay men.


56 posted on 10/05/2006 2:57:02 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Hmm....Proof...?

Soon...an in-depth interview with a shadow with an electronic voice.

57 posted on 10/05/2006 2:57:24 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

If this information were true, I think one or more of these pages would have complained to whoever runs the page program.


58 posted on 10/05/2006 2:57:24 PM PDT by carola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aviator

To my knowledge, no crime.

Foley was clearly sick, and we was shoved out soon as the GOP knew of it.

But the questions are now what did the Dems know, what did the MSM know, when did they know and the fact ABC LIED about the first IM exchange and even the age of the individual.

That makes everything they say now suspect.

They can publish 1001 accounts and I'm not going to give them the benefit of the doubt. Could be true, could not. That's the position ABC has put itself into now. I'll wait till our side checks everything they state throughly before giving up a damn thing.


59 posted on 10/05/2006 2:57:51 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

Politically, I don't think it matters how many "victims" ABC puts on parade now. The first "revelation" was obviously done in cooperation with someone on the Rat side. ABC is exposed as part of a Rat smear operation. Anything more will just increase the fury of the base when it all comes out -- hardly what the Rats wanted.


60 posted on 10/05/2006 2:57:58 PM PDT by Semi Civil Servant (Colorado: the original Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson