Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three More Former Pages Accuse Foley of Online Sexual Approaches
ABC News Blog ^

Posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:06 PM PDT by mmyers

Three more former congressional pages have come forward to reveal what they call "sexual approaches" over the Internet from former Congressman Mark Foley.

The pages served in the classes of 1998, 2000 and 2002. They independently approached ABC News after the Foley resignation through the Brian Ross & the Investigative Team's tip line on ABCNews.com. None wanted their names used because of the sensitive nature of the communications.

"I was seventeen years old and just returned to [my home state] when Foley began to e-mail me, asking if I had ever seen my page roommates naked and how big their penises were," said the page in the 2002 class.

The former page also said Foley told him that if he happened to be in Washington, D.C., he could stay at Foley's home if he "would engage in oral sex" with Foley.

THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS READER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Foley's Exchange with Underage Page Foley Instant Message Chat While Waiting for a House Vote Click Here to Watch This Week's Brian Ross Investigates Webcast The page told ABC News he was interviewed this week by FBI agents who had a six-page list of questions about Foley and the exchanges.

The second page who talked with ABC News, a graduate of the 2000 page class, says Foley actually visited the old page dorm and offered rides to events in his BMW.

"His e-mails developed into sexually explicit conversations, and he asked me for photographs of my erect penis," the former page said.

The page said Foley maintained e-mail contact with him even after he started college and arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned 18.

The third page interviewed by ABC News, a graduate of the 1998 page class, said Foley's instant messages began while he was a senior in high school.

"Foley would say he was sitting in his boxers and ask what I was wearing," the page said.

"It became more weird, and I stopped responding," the page said.

All three pages described similar instant message and e-mail patterns, with remarkably similar escalations of provocative questions.

"He didn't want to talk about politics," the page said. "He wanted to talk about sex or my penis," the page said.

The three new verbal accounts are in addition to two sets of sexually explicit instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages.

An online story on the Drudge Report Thursday claimed one set of the sexually explicit instant messages obtained by ABC News was part of a "prank" on the part of the former page, who reportedly says he goaded the congressman into writing the messages.

"This was no prank," said one of the three former pages who talked to ABC News today about his experience with the congressman.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcfrenzy; classaction; foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-338 next last
To: tndarlin

I would bet just hearsay. The longer ABC tries to prop-up this story, the more flimsy it will become.


221 posted on 10/05/2006 3:42:00 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vadkins
Seems Michelle Malkin is believing anything that ABC/Brian Ross writes. She's usually right on. Wonder what's up with this?

No one can figure it out actually. She cites noting more than some "glowing parents" whose children had a wonderful experience being exposed to the finest traditions of American government or some such liberal bilge. I've never heard conservatives talk like that.

She's lost a lot of points with me. If she actually knows sommething factual, she'd better speak up if she wants to retain a conservative audience and not just wither away into liberal blogland.
222 posted on 10/05/2006 3:42:24 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

ABC and those on the left who support their tactics are pure evil. Only evil people do this kind of thing. I'll tell you one thing. This little game of theirs has backfired. It's energized me more than ever for the upcoming election.


223 posted on 10/05/2006 3:42:39 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: mmyers
None wanted their names used because of the sensitive nature of the communications.

The DNC has shifted into invent-a-page overdrive.

They'll crank out as many anonymous pages as the MSM requires.

224 posted on 10/05/2006 3:42:40 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
They did the entire....."Is Hastert in trouble?" story, complete with steffy steponallofus, and NO BRIAN ROSS.

They went on to other world news and I changed the channel. I've just switched back, and they are still on World news. Coming up is an interview with GHWB BTW....

It's possible I missed something but I doubt it.

Surely some other freeper watched ABC NEWS TONIGHT, or has it tivoed?

225 posted on 10/05/2006 3:42:45 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter ("And you got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne; Shermy

I believe that foley used his computer and AOL account and did not use govt. computers or e-mail system.


226 posted on 10/05/2006 3:43:47 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
No, it means ABC is trying to right the sinking ship by pulling more "anonymous" sources out of their A$$3$.

Darn, wish I had some torpedos to lob at that sinking ship! The "anonymous source" angle is a loser any time.

227 posted on 10/05/2006 3:44:12 PM PDT by madison10 (Live your life in such a way that the preacher won't have to lie at your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
So the page could have been 13 and it would have been legal, if there was no talk of meeting for actual sex.

I think you're right. But since Jordan was demonstrably over 18, the point is moot. It was consensual adult cybersex (if that isn't too dignified a name for it).
228 posted on 10/05/2006 3:44:31 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan
Excuse me, the people who would hang Foley without any proof are the ones who need help.

Who's hanging Foley without any proof? Seems to me he hung himself with his own rope. You don't resign, check into an alcohol rehab program, allege you were abused by a Catholic priest and admit you have a problem with inappropriate sexual behaviour if you're innocent.

Being gay wasn't the crime.

229 posted on 10/05/2006 3:44:35 PM PDT by Sally'sConcerns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: All
First we find out the IM splashed by ABC as sexual and with a 16 year old, turned out to be with an 18 year old young man. Then we find out those same IMs were a prank! Did ABC even bother of adequately investigate these IMs to get their facts right, NO!

Now they come out with three anonymous pages whom contacted them via the web. Anyone buying this id dumber than a bag of rocks!!!
230 posted on 10/05/2006 3:44:49 PM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: tioga
YOU are assuming that other Congressmen knew about these sleazy IMs and that has not been proven.

No, I am assuming that other Congressmen knew that Foley was the sort of person who would write such e-mails. Evidently the pages who were involved in the "prank" knew that. Surely the man's colleagues knew it as well.

231 posted on 10/05/2006 3:44:59 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

ROFL!!

So if this is "breaking" news ABC trusts is reliable, why not break it on their own network with their pulitzer prize to be reporter? Unless they have no confidence in him or this new report. Unless they want to wait a day and see if this sells or not.

The omission of this "breaking news" on their nightly newscast tell me we're right to be questioning this account.


232 posted on 10/05/2006 3:45:13 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

With your nickname discussing cybersex, I think it is kinda wrong. You chose the name. I just would rather not see W. discussing cyber sex is all.


233 posted on 10/05/2006 3:45:31 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

Hhmmm...

Wouldn't you think- if these three new guys who popped up were legit...that Brian Ross would be all OVER it on tonight's news?

Curiouser and curiouser...


234 posted on 10/05/2006 3:45:54 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

This gets sicker all of the time.


235 posted on 10/05/2006 3:46:26 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Losers usually pick losing strategies, thank goodness.


236 posted on 10/05/2006 3:47:07 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: mmyers
"He didn't want to talk about politics," the page said. "He wanted to talk about sex or my penis," the page said.

Um, so was this kid still talking to him about these things? It sounds like he stayed online to chat.

237 posted on 10/05/2006 3:47:26 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Kind of seems like we're all being played for better internet traffic to ABC News/Malkin/Drudge's web sites?


238 posted on 10/05/2006 3:47:33 PM PDT by vadkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Agreed.

Fortunately most of us are calling ABC on their emulation of Rather.


239 posted on 10/05/2006 3:47:35 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

I know. ABC has shown what it's all about by not reporting any mitigating information around this story. They're determined to sink the GOP if they can with this story, the facts be damned. I haven't heard hardly anyone reporting on the fact this page was 18. Foley still showed poor judgement and acted sleazy, but if the kid was 18 and was soliciting these remarks as his friends are saying then that puts this story in a whole other league. It then doesn't rise to any level beyond "Ewww ick" and then looking away. It doesn't rise to the level of nearly a week's media feeding frenzy while we have an organized movement in the world out to kill Americans anywhere, any time regardless of whether they're civilians.


240 posted on 10/05/2006 3:47:35 PM PDT by MikeA (Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That is what 's at stake in this election, not some pervert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson