Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three More Former Pages Accuse Foley of Online Sexual Approaches
ABC News Blog ^

Posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:06 PM PDT by mmyers

Three more former congressional pages have come forward to reveal what they call "sexual approaches" over the Internet from former Congressman Mark Foley.

The pages served in the classes of 1998, 2000 and 2002. They independently approached ABC News after the Foley resignation through the Brian Ross & the Investigative Team's tip line on ABCNews.com. None wanted their names used because of the sensitive nature of the communications.

"I was seventeen years old and just returned to [my home state] when Foley began to e-mail me, asking if I had ever seen my page roommates naked and how big their penises were," said the page in the 2002 class.

The former page also said Foley told him that if he happened to be in Washington, D.C., he could stay at Foley's home if he "would engage in oral sex" with Foley.

THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS READER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Foley's Exchange with Underage Page Foley Instant Message Chat While Waiting for a House Vote Click Here to Watch This Week's Brian Ross Investigates Webcast The page told ABC News he was interviewed this week by FBI agents who had a six-page list of questions about Foley and the exchanges.

The second page who talked with ABC News, a graduate of the 2000 page class, says Foley actually visited the old page dorm and offered rides to events in his BMW.

"His e-mails developed into sexually explicit conversations, and he asked me for photographs of my erect penis," the former page said.

The page said Foley maintained e-mail contact with him even after he started college and arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned 18.

The third page interviewed by ABC News, a graduate of the 1998 page class, said Foley's instant messages began while he was a senior in high school.

"Foley would say he was sitting in his boxers and ask what I was wearing," the page said.

"It became more weird, and I stopped responding," the page said.

All three pages described similar instant message and e-mail patterns, with remarkably similar escalations of provocative questions.

"He didn't want to talk about politics," the page said. "He wanted to talk about sex or my penis," the page said.

The three new verbal accounts are in addition to two sets of sexually explicit instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages.

An online story on the Drudge Report Thursday claimed one set of the sexually explicit instant messages obtained by ABC News was part of a "prank" on the part of the former page, who reportedly says he goaded the congressman into writing the messages.

"This was no prank," said one of the three former pages who talked to ABC News today about his experience with the congressman.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcfrenzy; classaction; foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-338 next last
To: Howlin

Nice catch. :)


161 posted on 10/05/2006 3:21:22 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Dane

OK, fine, I give up. You're right. The GOP will gain seats in both the House and Senate. Maybe the Dems will just give up and die.


162 posted on 10/05/2006 3:21:46 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

Was there any sex involved -- I mean did Foley diddle any of these youngsters -- or is this all about emails and instant messages?


163 posted on 10/05/2006 3:21:47 PM PDT by Noli MeTangere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How would the three pages he talked to today know whether or not those IMs were pranks or not.

The rapid reaction and very sudden appearance of the three right after the Drudge Story broke makes the whole 'story' stink to high heaven.

164 posted on 10/05/2006 3:23:02 PM PDT by batter ("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: mmyers
AND, it's only THURSDAY.....wait until the FRIDAY DUMP by the MEDIA!!!!
165 posted on 10/05/2006 3:23:09 PM PDT by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

I really think it's time for the Repubs to release info about the Dem scandals.


166 posted on 10/05/2006 3:23:56 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

BTTT


167 posted on 10/05/2006 3:23:59 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

"Oh do spare us, "the disparate power relationship". Cry us a river."

Actually I'm not crying but getting some laughs. Not you but the bots who days ago were ranting about Foley being gay, etc. are now trying to minimize, fantasizing left wing conspiracies to label all REpubs as Foley supporters, etc.

Don't know where this change came from. Maybe it's something Limbaugh said today and we're hearing the dittoheads converse between themselves.


168 posted on 10/05/2006 3:24:17 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
Wait, Dan needs one of these for his "fake but accurate" IM's...

169 posted on 10/05/2006 3:24:26 PM PDT by NewLand (Always Remember September 11, 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
"This has grown tiresome . . . "

Yes, the same MSM that castigated Kenneth Starr ("sexual McCarthyism" etc) for his alleged prurient interest in the sex lives of politicians is now obsessed with this story, even though the perp has already resigned.
170 posted on 10/05/2006 3:24:34 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How would the three pages he talked to today know whether or not those IMs were pranks or not.

Good question. Is he claiming that the current "new" claims aren't pranks, or that the recently-uncovered "hand creme" IMs are "no prank?"

IMO it's deliberately written to sound deceptive and ambiguous.

171 posted on 10/05/2006 3:25:07 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Spinning I tell you...dizzy and going in circles.

You should hear Mark Levin- he's apoplectic..really furious that ABC considers the pornographic stuff "news"..


172 posted on 10/05/2006 3:25:56 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland
"so that means foley has to resign three more times..."

BWAHAAAAAAAAA!!!

Yup.

...apparently.

173 posted on 10/05/2006 3:25:56 PM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Perhaps there were five or six pages involved in this prank.

I doubt it. Two were from different classes (1998, 2000). Maybe the 2002 page knew Edmunds, but then again, ABC has been sure to provide no details etc. ABC is trying to cover-up.

174 posted on 10/05/2006 3:25:56 PM PDT by batter ("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
I ask his because I saw a former page on O'Reilly who said that when he left Page School and returned home he started getting suggestive IM's, suddenly and from someone he didn't know until several weeks later when he figured out it was Foley. That story sounded awfully fishy to me. Is it as fishy as I think?

I saw that interview too, and I agree with your assessment--very good point. If he got unsolicited pervy IMs from a "stranger," why wouldn't he just block that user from being able to contact him? That is standard practice to avoid unwanted IMs.

175 posted on 10/05/2006 3:26:04 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
That story had just hit Drudge at 2:00 PM central, and so within 3 hours, ABC has the story, has it posted AND they say "it was no prank?".

You think that maybe ABC had these guys in the background all along, waiting to pop them on us a little more closer to election day (only to be forced to use them now thanks to Drudge)?

176 posted on 10/05/2006 3:26:10 PM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"How would the three pages he talked to today know whether or not those IMs were pranks or not."

Even better. We were wondering earlier about the timing being strange, but how in the bloody world could those pages speak for the "prank" story? Well, unless he was talking to Jason, I guess that's possible.

Oh, and another thing, by virtue of what Ross wrote, those pages HAD to have spoken to him after 3:00PM Eastern, which was well after Hastert informed us of the Hotline and asked for information in the investigation.

177 posted on 10/05/2006 3:26:32 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter ("And you got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat

This is a head fake by our government with the media in full complicity. A band of primitive Arabs are holding an entire world hostage.

Our people have failed in government. It's not the government's fault... we as Americans have sent the worst of our populace to Washington. Washington and every capital city in the glorious 50 states have been infested by used car salesmen.


178 posted on 10/05/2006 3:26:46 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne

I think he obviously means that the new claims aren't pranks.


179 posted on 10/05/2006 3:27:01 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: mmyers

What they said means nothing without proof. It looks like ABC is CBSing us.


180 posted on 10/05/2006 3:27:15 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson