Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News: Foley Case Destroying Repub Chances
Fox News | 11/5/06

Posted on 10/05/2006 10:22:48 AM PDT by pabianice

Pending Hastert's news conference, Fox is reporting that internal Repub polls indicate that the Foley matter is destroying any chance of the Repubs keeping the House, "and maybe the Senate as well." Breaking as we await the Hastert news congerence. Fox reports that the entire country is riveted by this matter and it has "blown away" all other issues for the upcoming mid-terms.

I have a hard time believing this manufactured scandal is having this effect, but Fox seems to be shooting straight on this. Perhaps the dealy in the Hastert new conference is due to furious fighting over whether he needs to resign as speaker today. With no other candidate standing-by, Fox notes that Congress would be required to re-convene to elect a new speaker, keeping this mess in the lime light right up to election day. This ambush was apparently very well planned.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; bullzogby; dncbrownshirts; election2006; foley; foleygate; foxnews; howtostealanelection; makingitup; mediabias; polls; thebiglie; yeahandkerrywon; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: LibLieSlayer

LIB WOW, great, AND PEW research is a dem shill outfit along with NPR


101 posted on 10/05/2006 11:00:38 AM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
To: boomop1

Paste: " This is a Welstone minute and will backfire."

I wish I could see how.

Pretty simple, really. The Dems pulled the trigger on this too early. I've already heard that the Democraps have far more "Foleys" -- and that people in the beltway know about them. With 33 days left, there will be time for a Republican counter-punch: Imagine a whole bunch of Dem Foley's exposed just before the election.

In other words, the Dems have jumped the shark here.

Rush just said, "what if this is a set up." Hmmm, sounds almost... Rovian.

102 posted on 10/05/2006 11:01:50 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb

Same here Becky. Rush has been at the forefront of the GOP fighting back.

Quislings like Savage and Laura Ingraham are gone in my book


103 posted on 10/05/2006 11:02:29 AM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

If Republicans let this phoney Democrat and media created non sex sex scandal effect their vote in a negative way then they deserve to lose a hundred seats

I'm getting so sick of people like you with this "they deserve to lose a hundred seats BS"! Try to remember what happens when you decide to "show those Republicans a thing or two and stay home". Dems win and YOU & I lose big time.


104 posted on 10/05/2006 11:03:31 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

it isnt the end of the world if the Dems take congress becasue of a scandal...scandals have no long term lasting effect....the dems cannot build a lasting governing majority based on a scandal.

This is probably the best reason to lose congress if control is to be lost. The voters will vote dem not becasue they want impeachment, higher taxes, cut and run....it wont be a turnover caused by an idealogical struggle...thus ultimatley the DEMs are doomed...this fiasco will only discourge the left from coming up with ideas that could ive them a lasting governing majority


105 posted on 10/05/2006 11:05:15 AM PDT by DontBelieveAugPolls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

If "the country" were thinking at all, it would realize that Foley is just a typical homosexual, looking for gay sex aka sodomy, with young men or boys. He's no different than the gays parading and flashing signs about gay rights and gay pride. "The country" should realize that gay sex is about sodomy and the spread of disease, but Congress generally seeks to protect gays from "discrimination". And now the public schools in some areas are teaching our kids about gay "lifestyle", as if it were something normal instead of a threat to public health. Gays cause disease; the reproduce exactly Nothing.

FOX is the same as the rest of the media prostitutes. Rupert Murdoch even hosted a fund raising dinner for Hillary Klinton.


106 posted on 10/05/2006 11:06:03 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom

What are you suggesting? That we watch CNN?


107 posted on 10/05/2006 11:06:05 AM PDT by GOPJ (Like Larry Flynt, the MSM is only interested in the scandal when a Republican is involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

oh yeah thats real smart!!!!


108 posted on 10/05/2006 11:06:45 AM PDT by DontBelieveAugPolls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

Do you think that it will not cross their minds when they go to vote about who is the party of abortionists and homosexual agenda? How about who is the party that is going to raise their taxes? Who is the party of weakness and defeatism in this war on terror? Or are they too stupid to think this way when they vote? Get real.


109 posted on 10/05/2006 11:07:45 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: albie

why dont you read my post again and remember the thread title


110 posted on 10/05/2006 11:08:36 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I seriously doubt this claim. If voters would react in this manner, then even more Democrats would lose.


111 posted on 10/05/2006 11:08:37 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Reagan Democrats

They do not exist anymore, there are only Republicans and independents leaning Republican as well as democrats and independents leaning democrat.

112 posted on 10/05/2006 11:10:32 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: DontBelieveAugPolls

Why not?


113 posted on 10/05/2006 11:12:33 AM PDT by GOPJ (Like Larry Flynt, the MSM is only interested in the scandal when a Republican is involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

And what did you tell your mother? did you inform her about the truth or did you bash the Republican party the way you do here on FR?


114 posted on 10/05/2006 11:13:12 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
I cannot believe Republican voters would be so fickle or ignorant as to give up control of the House because of something as stupid as this event.

Why not? I can. One hundred forty-thousand something voted for Patrick Buchanan, including several thousand in Florida (which was a few *hundred* votes close, and catapulted us into an election crisis.) There's no reason why it couldn't happen again.

Right now, it's looking like "lifeboat" politics - who do you toss? The hardcore "right wing?" The Log Cabin-ners?

115 posted on 10/05/2006 11:13:22 AM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JackDanielsOldNo7

what is interesting is that this scandal is one week and old yet no polls


116 posted on 10/05/2006 11:13:44 AM PDT by DontBelieveAugPolls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DontBelieveAugPolls
Why not? Gays in the Republican Party don't get any of the protection offered to gays who are Democrat. Do you really think the MSM would deal with this as anything other than a "yawn" if it was a democrat who did this to a page? No, gays can be used against us, but what do they offer our party? Tell me. and read this - this is how it would have been handled if he was a dem.

Ann Coulter:

In 1983, Democratic congressman Gerry Studds was found to have sexually propositioned House pages and actually buggered a 17-year-old male page whom he took on a trip to Portugal. The 46-year-old Studds indignantly attacked those who criticized him for what he called a "mutually voluntary, private relationship between adults."

Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy referred to Studds' affair with a teenage page as "a brief consenting homosexual relationship" and denounced Studds' detractors for engaging in a "witch hunt" against gays: "New England witch trials belong to the past, or so it is thought. This summer on Cape Cod, the reputation of Rep Gerry Studds was burned at the stake by a large number of his constituents determined to torch the congressman for his private life."

Meanwhile, Foley is hiding in a hole someplace.

No one demanded to know why the Democrat Speaker of the House, Thomas "Tip" O'Neill, took one full decade to figure out that Studds was propositioning male pages.

Ann Coulter

117 posted on 10/05/2006 11:15:40 AM PDT by GOPJ (Like Larry Flynt, the MSM is only interested in the scandal when a Republican is involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Politics is a art of controlling perception.

He who controls this best, wins.....

Facts, all to often, take a back seat to perceptions, and those who are easily manipulated are the targets of the democrap attack machine. (I'll let you decide just who those people are)

Rove can do things with the presidential pulpit to correct some of this, but congress has it's own popularity ratings and perceptions that they alone must deal with.

118 posted on 10/05/2006 11:16:19 AM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
One hundred forty-thousand something voted for Patrick Buchanan

This is out of 50 million voters who voted Republican! Get real, do you know simple arithmetic!

119 posted on 10/05/2006 11:16:39 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Right now, it's looking like "lifeboat" politics - who do you toss? The hardcore "right wing?" The Log Cabin-ners?

Would you rather have a house with Log Cabin Republicans or homosexual agenda pushing Democrats?
120 posted on 10/05/2006 11:19:53 AM PDT by msnimje (Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson