Posted on 10/03/2006 3:57:21 PM PDT by EveningStar
...Always willing to do my part to clear up any confusion about liberal motives and intentions, I offer the following four-step plan, based on my keen observation of the political scene, as a guide to the policies Democrats would like to pursue in Iraq:
Step One
The Iraqi court now trying Saddam should be disbanded. Saddam should be cleared of all charges, released from prison with our apologies and restored to his rightful role as the unanimously elected leader of Iraq...
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
How funny! But also sad.
Good one! It's hilarious, but I have no doubt whatever that some 'Rat would actually propose these with a straight face.
Bump
How were you able to slip past Security and attend the RAT'S POLICY meeting without detection?
Amazing!
Step 5: Give amnesty to all illegal aliens, including those from terrorist nations. Allowing terrorist to live and train in the United States like the 9/11 terrorist is a risk democrats are willing to take.
That pretty much sums up what Ted Turner was reported to have said today on another FR post. "Give them (the muslims) what they want to leave us alone."
Did they asked for an a**whipping yet?
I think we are supposed to get some prayer mats, korans and high decibel speakers to blast that horrible music in our ears 24/7.
No thanks, I did that fifty years ago for 18 months in Libya at a US Air Base, about a fraction of the size of Turner's ranch in Montana. Let him replicate a Muslim paradise on his million acre ranch.
Although this article was supposed to be humorous, it is actually very close to the truth.
Just what do the DemoWimps plan to do? They have not really said, have they. It is a given, if they gain control, that they will impeach Bush on trumped up charges...their whole platform is based on hate for him.
It is a given that they will set a timetable for Iraq withdrawal that gives no consideration to the national security of the United States. But, hell, it will make all those DemoWimps that missed the 60s happy, won't it?
Oh, God, save me from a government that sets policy designed to gain the adulation of Hollywood stars.
Rumsfeld Use of Word 'Appease' Irks Dems
Sept. 18, 2006
In a speech to the American Legion Convention in Salt Lake City, Secretary Rumsfeld asked “Can we truly afford to believe that somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?” Inasmuch as the term “appeasement” is widely associated with unsuccessful pre-World War II efforts to deter Adolf Hitler from starting a war, Democratic critics of President Bush’s handling of the war on terror were quick to take offense.
“I never said ‘appease,’” protested Representative John Murtha (D-Penn). “I said we should assuage the fears of the Muslims by pulling our troops out of their countries.”
“Mollify is the term I use,” said Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisc). “I am no appeaser. I am a ‘mollifier.’”
“At first, I was for placating our adversaries,” said Senator John Kerry (D-Mass). “Later I switched to favor propitiation. But now I agree with Senator Feinberg. I think we should mollify them. Parenthetically, if I may interject, they would most likely have been placated, propitiated and/or mollified by now if I had been elected president in 2004. But never, ever would I appease them. Rumsfeld is slandering me.”
“I am no appeaser,” said Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass). “Getting bombed has always struck me as the better option. Rumsfeld needs to apologize and resign.”
“This is almost as bad as the ‘cut-run-surrender’ smear the Republicans have been trying to lay on us,” Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee Chairman, complained. “We never said that. Our position is that the U.S. should disengage, flee and yield. And we aren’t waving a white flag. It’s ‘cream.’”
Thus far, Rumsfeld has declined to apologize, resign, or respond to the Democrats’ complaints. “How can I respond?” Rumsfeld asked. “Their position is incoherent. Appease, mollify, placate, whatever—it’s all the same thing.”
The Democrats’ stance received an endorsement from Iran. "The United States is too weak to prevail over the holy forces of Islam," Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said during a meeting with a visiting Syrian foreign ministry official. “The American people should heed the advice of leaders such as Senator Kerry and Congressman Murtha. It is the only way they can save their necks from the avenging sword of righteous jihad. We are prepared to be mollified, placated or propitiated—or whatever the infidels choose to call it.”
In related news, Iran has also suggested that U.S. troops leave Iraq. “The American occupiers must leave Iraq,” government spokesman Gholam-Hossein Elham said. “Their goals have been achieved. Saddam has been deposed. The weapons of mass destruction threat has been ended. A constitution has been completed. A new government has been elected. The Americans have won. They can go home now.”
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Column_Archives.htm
Those damn appeasers. Where did I hear the following, on FR or on local radio? Whatever, it says it all:
Supposing there was a rapist loose in your neighborhood, and some nut is going around yelling, "Don't hurt him. Don't hurt him. Don't even try to find him or he might rape some woman again."
I could be wrong but, I'm detecting a hint of sarcasm in this article.
Very sad that this "plan" offers 100% more than the donks have.
Don't forget that we would have to use taxpayer dollars to fund Saddams army to protect the country from Israeli agression.
Of course since the RATS have been saying that our equipment is outdated, the US military should just leave theirs in Iraq. Democrats can then say that they saved the country billions in shipping, maintenance and war making expenses.
They can then apply that money to more midnight basketball programs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.