Posted on 10/02/2006 5:41:31 PM PDT by paltz
I wouldn't put it past the traitorous bunch dems..they are as bad as they were during the Civil War.
The most important post of the evening BUMP!
Hastert: Who(Which Dems) Had Foley's IMs for Three Years?
or
Who (Which republicans) had foley's IMs for 3 years?
politics is a dirty game.
It's actually possible that this was entrapment.
I don't care if it was entrapment--it takes two to tango. I have zero sympathy for hypocritical POSs like Foley.
I believe those are the things Hastert wants the AG to find out. I read today that the FBI has begun its investigation.
the FBI isn't going to get to the bottom of that part of the story.
I smell a rat. A whole party of rats.
Oh, I'm glad they forced Foley out, if he admitted to them that he had sent the IMs. They're showing they won't support his kind of garbage. I don't like the fact that for innocuous things like what Trent said about Strom Thurmond, they rolled over and played dead for the Dems and the media. THAT was spineless.
what's so koolaid about asking these questions?
They are indeed legitimate questions, and if Congressional Democrats knew about the IM's before congressional republicans here then a real legal issue is going on that you don't want to address, b/c then the wrong people people are being blamed for the wrong reasons.
Be careful, many here will accuse you of being disloyal for even positing that.
Yes I have read some of those reports that Soros and his crew are behind this. Now, think about it. They deliberately chose to have Foley continue with his predation, and wait until they could derive optimum benefit at the poles. During that time, ponder the possibility of other children being preyed upon. But that would not matter to the dem. As long as they win the House. It is beyond political opportunism. It is political opportunism at the expense of putting children up for the expense of it. It is more than adults misbehaving with adults, in all of their forms. It is the willful, conscience choice to use the children as a tool to their political end. If the kids get scarred in the process....so be it. That is too much to ignore. The republicans need to get down and ugly. Put it all out there, this is internicine warfare.
oh, no, you are right. the "overly-friendly" defense is a bunch of BS. What the hell does that mean, anyway? and if its no big deal, why ask him to stop talking to the kid? This is a joke. "Oh, I only thought he was flirting with the boy, I didn't know he wanted to have sex with him!" Quit defending it.
Indeed.
I have no loyalty to any party.
my loyalty is to my nation, my constitution and my fellow citizens.
Not that anyone cares really, but at least you brought the issue of loyalty up for discussion.
"the FBI isn't going to get to the bottom"
we may need Foley back to do that!!
I'm shocked someone (else) would bring up principle before party. Be prepared to suffer the slings and arrows here. Quite sad really but to be expected.
I'm not defending Foley. Read my posts. If you are still confused, get someone to read them to you.
You're beginning to become hysterical and methinks thou dost protest just a wee bit too much. You do know what THAT suggests.....don't you?
From what I have seen so far of these PDFs are poorly constructed Fakes.
I have a problem with the fact they have NO DATES only time stamps and Font colors and type change during sessions as if the sexxed up text was added by someone that has never IMed and was color blind.
You're absolutely right; well put...I couldn't have said it any better!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.