Skip to comments.
Hastert: Who(Which Dems) Had Foley's IMs for Three Years?
Rush Limbaugh ^
| 10/02/06
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 10/02/2006 5:41:31 PM PDT by paltz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-144 next last
1
posted on
10/02/2006 5:41:32 PM PDT
by
paltz
To: paltz
how did the kid (and I presume, his parents) contact the DNC and the media, did he log these sessions "innocently"? was he a plant to lure Foley all along?
2
posted on
10/02/2006 5:44:31 PM PDT
by
oceanview
To: paltz
Wanna-be DFL congresscritter Patty Wetterling has been all over the Minnesota media demanding answers and resignations.
Careful, Patty, you might not like the answers to your questions!!
To: paltz
"Hastert just went out there and said we -- the Republicans -- we did not have these instant messages. We did not know about these instant messages, but somebody did. Who are they?" A very, VERY good question! Someone was holding this and waiting to spring it. If it's revealed a DIM was holding onto this information this thing could backfire on them.
4
posted on
10/02/2006 5:47:34 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: oceanview
"did he log these sessions "innocently"? "It isn't unusual for messaging software to log conversations. I believe all of them do by default, and that's something that has to be disabled.
5
posted on
10/02/2006 5:48:40 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: paltz
who holds on to im's for 3 years unless they plan to use them against the person who wrote them later?
6
posted on
10/02/2006 5:48:45 PM PDT
by
paltz
To: paltz
EXACTLY!! John Gibson,Michelle Malkin, Captainquarters Ed, Wall Street Journal and Bill O'Reilly have all jumped the shark on this. Republican leadership was ONLY AWARE OF THE EMAILS, which were described as "overly-friendly not sexual" and the page was of consent age and his parents wanted no action taken! What can't people understand about this!! Everyone should step back and look at the facts.
The IMS were in possessions of donks and their lberal msm shills for three years! They knew the contents but suppressed them for political advantage, even with the potential harm of a predator damamging children. Anyone with a brain larger than a pea should see the donks behavior is as dangerous as Foley.
7
posted on
10/02/2006 5:48:51 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: paltz
PROSECUTE THE 'RATS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. JAIL THEM.
8
posted on
10/02/2006 5:49:12 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: jrooney
Malkin never misses a chance to attack Republicans.
9
posted on
10/02/2006 5:51:07 PM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: jrooney
Don't forget Michael Reagan.
10
posted on
10/02/2006 5:52:37 PM PDT
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: paltz
were the emails and the IMs sent to the same page? I thought I read somewhere that they were two separate people. does anyone know for sure?
11
posted on
10/02/2006 5:52:39 PM PDT
by
tazannie
To: paltz
Does Foley have a scorned ex-lover, ex-partner, ex-butt buddy, who may have wanted to get back at him?
12
posted on
10/02/2006 5:53:37 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: TexKat
Does Foley have a scorned ex-lover, ex-partner, ex-butt buddy, who may have wanted to get back at him?
13
posted on
10/02/2006 5:54:32 PM PDT
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: jrooney
OReilly was out of control on this.
Don't get me wrong, Foley's behavior is bad, but during the Foley segment, for OReilly to be tossing around the "jessica's law" mantra - this case, from what we know so far, has nothing to do with that kind of a crime against a child.
To: paltz
You know like they say a wooooooMan's scorn!
15
posted on
10/02/2006 5:54:52 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: COEXERJ145
I agree. What pisses me off though is when peole pop off without all the facts this close to an election, that could be the deciding factor for middle of the road voters to vote donk or some republicans not to vote, thus giving us a Pelosi house and a Reid senate. I will fight to the bitter end to deny those terrorist supporting libs more power.
16
posted on
10/02/2006 5:54:58 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: jrooney
but who made that connection? the kid has these logs on his PC, how does he get from there - to the DNC and ABC?
To: frogjerk
Boy you are fast frogjerk :)
18
posted on
10/02/2006 5:56:00 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: frogjerk
I just read about him. He is on my list now too! Bunch of the hell with the facts dumbasses.
19
posted on
10/02/2006 5:56:07 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: paltz
Interesting....Only today did the MSM (Fox News, actually) start to differentiate between the emails (which were supposedly odd, but not sexual) and the IMs (which were sexually explicit). Do I see a conspiracy here? I think so.
Methinks the Dems sat on this until about a month before the election and then released them. The effect was (obviously) to make it look like a Republican coverup was going on. Well, if the current facts pan out, its looking like that will backfire. If it comes out that the Dems sat on this for years, for calculated political advantage, that will be news. But I bet if that's what happened, the story will suddenly disappear from the front pages.
20
posted on
10/02/2006 5:56:09 PM PDT
by
rbg81
(1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-144 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson