Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 1 October 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 1 October 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 10/01/2006 4:26:20 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, October 1st, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf; Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, and his Democratic opponent, Rep. Sherrod Brown.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Presidential counselor Dan Bartlett; Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Bartlett; Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.; poet laureate Donald Hall.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Bartlett; U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad; Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.; former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; news; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: defconw; Right_in_Virginia



WOW --- I love this guy on Fox.
He nails Clinton & Burglar.


361 posted on 10/01/2006 7:27:03 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

FNS Reality Check segment in response to Clinton allegations the previous week.

FNS-Clinton-Reality-Check-100106, part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywwOdVKGhK0

FNS-Clinton-Reality-Check-100106, part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFBBF3BbULA


362 posted on 10/01/2006 7:27:38 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The DNC talking points are set.

Democrats seek to confuse emails with instant messages.

Democrats, as the party of homosexuals, would have known foleys homosexual activitics far more than republicans.


Democrats are pushing woodwards book in this scanda too!


363 posted on 10/01/2006 7:27:55 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Did anyone notice that Darfur commercial that ran twice on Fox News Sunday? At the end, the commercial implored viewers to contact Bush to stop the genocide now.

I noticed it. I thought it rather strange. Why are they not appealing to the UN? Why are they imploring Bush to do something?

The ad does reveal one specific problem: The UN is a useless body of corruption and graft -- and the America and Japan pay for over 40% of the costs of the UN.
364 posted on 10/01/2006 7:28:01 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The kid does not sound credible. Anyone can say "I have a friend who...blah, blah, blah." It's here say. I'm not defending Foley, but the timing of all this is suspect.
365 posted on 10/01/2006 7:28:14 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak; onyx
It was a very effective ad until the end. IMO it is a very carefully camoflaged Dem campaign ad, and needs to be called out as such.

I was kicking around the idea of starting a thread about that ad. I'll do a bit more research and pull things together.

366 posted on 10/01/2006 7:29:16 AM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline, go away today. I don't feel much like dancing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
I'm going to disagree slightly with your view of the ad.

I believe producing the ad know the futility of having the UN do anything.

I think it's an appeal to the only person poweful enough and moral enough to do anything about it.

Could they state in better, yes.

But the ad is a direct emotional appeal.

367 posted on 10/01/2006 7:29:31 AM PDT by Darth Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny

I sure hope Brown did as poorly as you say.

The race is still close enough where the dynamic can change and Dewine can pull it out (as opposed to Montana, where Burns is dead in the water and money should be pulled out and put in MO, OH, NJ, TN, etc).

This really is the worst crop of GOP Senate candidates/incumbents in a long time.


368 posted on 10/01/2006 7:29:38 AM PDT by GOPcomeback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

...But the ad gives the impression at the very end thast it's all Bush's fault..and that is simply not true!


369 posted on 10/01/2006 7:29:42 AM PDT by mystery-ak (My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yea speculation and conjecture is not the point Facts speak for themselves !
370 posted on 10/01/2006 7:29:44 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (In everyday life there is more than meets the eye to reach the depths of truth we must DRAGTHEWATERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"Woo hoo .. On Fox Michael Sheuer(sp?) called Clinton and Berger liars"

Ya gotta love it. The fact is every point he suggests they are lying about has been confirmed by others AND their own words!!


371 posted on 10/01/2006 7:30:03 AM PDT by lawdude (Bill Clinton is a virus and should be treated as such.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Check out my post #348 - they were applauding Bush on September 19th in a press release while they were preparing this ad implying he is not working to solve the genocide. Despicable.


372 posted on 10/01/2006 7:30:22 AM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline, go away today. I don't feel much like dancing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend; Timeout
I believe the final consensus on Burglar was that he was removing the security assessment after X42 regime.

What he admitted to removing and destroying were several draft versions of a memo regarding actions they took or failed to take after various terrorist incidents during the Clinton presidency.  The final memo was a whitewash and was left in the archives and presented as "evidence" to the 9/11 commission.  The earlier drafts presuably had both harsher assessments and, more damaging, hand written notes with instructions to change or leave out portions that were too critical.  According to "informed sources" it was those notes that they were desperate to destroy as some were written by Billy Jeff himself.

Rush, on the other hand, thinks Berger put some documents into the archives to create a paper trail to back up false testimony they planned to give.

373 posted on 10/01/2006 7:30:23 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: All

This is an interesting thread...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1711557/posts?page=1

A new UN report seems to be more upbeat than the NIE.

Here is the report itself:

http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/529/76/PDF/N0652976.pdf?OpenElement


374 posted on 10/01/2006 7:30:27 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

OK> Good. I think you're onto something important. It needs a thread of its own.


375 posted on 10/01/2006 7:30:37 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; maica; ColdSpringGirl
On FNS, Daniel Benjamin did not answer the questions asked him. Once he referred to what the 911 commission said. Next he said that there was "not enough proof." His third comment began, "I was no longer in the White House, but..." and went on to repeat the appropriate propaganda.

One thing that I heard for the first time today was that Bin Ladin was never a possible target during President Bush's first 8 months, thus he couldn't have "gotten him" as the left keeps complaining. To this comment, Wallace commented on the "failure of will by both presidents." I don't think so, but this comes from the same Chris Wallace who usually refers to ex42 as President Clinton and to the current president as MR. Bush. On this MR vs President topic, I thought it was interesting that Wallace said "Bill Clinton" several times in his commentary on the 4000 emails he got about the interview. This was a prepared statement. Perhaps some of those emails referred to the false impression that ex42 had (pretended to have?) about him.

Michael Scheuer said that the Jusuits taught "If you have to lie, never lie about the facts." He went on to say that the 911 Commission ignored some vital documents and then let no one with the facts about them testify. I guess having Jamie Gorelick decide which documents the commissioners should see might have something to do with this.

376 posted on 10/01/2006 7:31:17 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Darth Republican
I believe producing the ad know the futility of having the UN do anything.

Sorry I meant, "I believe those producing the ad know the futility of having the UN do anything."

377 posted on 10/01/2006 7:31:21 AM PDT by Darth Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Defcon amen re Rudy....he's the only one who gets it


378 posted on 10/01/2006 7:31:42 AM PDT by texicali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: lawdude


He was awesome and factual!
Need to see him make the rounds of ALL the shows.


379 posted on 10/01/2006 7:31:44 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

.....MY OPINION!!!!!!!



Okay, so let me give my opinion. Cause I got one.

The problem with homosexuals as I see it, is not that they prefer members of their own sex. Although, go with me here, that's not the way nature designed it and nature's pretty smart about such things.

But even as they pee upon our feet and tell us it's raining...THEY ALWAYS GO AFTER THE YOUNG BOY FLESH.

Sure they come out with that spin that there's no more homo child predators than hetero child predators but I ain't buying it.

So why do they have "Gay Day" at Disney World? Why don't they get on the rides with the rest of us? Oh, wait...Disney World, synonomous with young kids.

Why do they want to get all involved with the Boy Scouts? Boy Scouts....get it?

I don't trust them and I'll tell you something else, the vast majority of homosexuals do NOT live quiet, loving faithful lives that they'd have us believe. They are promiscuous and disease-spreading. Sure some are devoted and faithful but many, if not most, lives depraved lives.

Sure I believe they are born that way. I know homosexuals via my consulting with a beauty salon. A guy who does hair, go with me here, is usually a bit light in the loafers.

But many blind people are born that way and WE DON'T LET THEM DRIVE A CAR.

Handicapped is handicapped. Homosexuality is a handicap. They should be allowed to live thriving happy lives just as any other American. But they should not be allowed to marry or raise children.

Hey, that's my opinion. And when the vast majority of Americans go into the sanctity of that voting booth, with no PC police screaming at them, they vote AGAINST homosexual marriage.

Cause we get it out here in la-la land. We're not as stupid as they think we are.


380 posted on 10/01/2006 7:31:46 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,041-1,044 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson