Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 1 October 2006

Various big media television networks ^ | 1 October 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

[onyx]

WOW --- I love this guy on Fox.
He nails Clinton & Burglar.

[TomGuy]

FNS Reality Check segment in response to Clinton allegations the previous week.

FNS-Clinton-Reality-Check-100106, part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywwOdVKGhK0

FNS-Clinton-Reality-Check-100106, part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFBBF3BbULA

[longtermmemmory]

The DNC talking points are set.

Democrats seek to confuse emails with instant messages.

Democrats, as the party of homosexuals, would have known foleys homosexual activitics far more than republicans.


Democrats are pushing woodwards book in this scanda too!

[TomGuy]

Did anyone notice that Darfur commercial that ran twice on Fox News Sunday? At the end, the commercial implored viewers to contact Bush to stop the genocide now.

I noticed it. I thought it rather strange. Why are they not appealing to the UN? Why are they imploring Bush to do something?

The ad does reveal one specific problem: The UN is a useless body of corruption and graft -- and the America and Japan pay for over 40% of the costs of the UN.

[SMM48]

The kid does not sound credible. Anyone can say "I have a friend who...blah, blah, blah." It's here say. I'm not defending Foley, but the timing of all this is suspect.

[dirtboy]

It was a very effective ad until the end. IMO it is a very carefully camoflaged Dem campaign ad, and needs to be called out as such.

I was kicking around the idea of starting a thread about that ad. I'll do a bit more research and pull things together.

[Darth Republican]

I'm going to disagree slightly with your view of the ad.

I believe producing the ad know the futility of having the UN do anything.

I think it's an appeal to the only person poweful enough and moral enough to do anything about it.

Could they state in better, yes.

But the ad is a direct emotional appeal.

[GOPcomeback]

I sure hope Brown did as poorly as you say.

The race is still close enough where the dynamic can change and Dewine can pull it out (as opposed to Montana, where Burns is dead in the water and money should be pulled out and put in MO, OH, NJ, TN, etc).

This really is the worst crop of GOP Senate candidates/incumbents in a long time.

[mystery-ak]

...But the ad gives the impression at the very end thast it's all Bush's fault..and that is simply not true!

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

Yea speculation and conjecture is not the point Facts speak for themselves !

[lawdude]

"Woo hoo .. On Fox Michael Sheuer(sp?) called Clinton and Berger liars"

Ya gotta love it. The fact is every point he suggests they are lying about has been confirmed by others AND their own words!!

[dirtboy]

Check out my post #348 - they were applauding Bush on September 19th in a press release while they were preparing this ad implying he is not working to solve the genocide. Despicable.

[Phsstpok]

I believe the final consensus on Burglar was that he was removing the security assessment after X42 regime.

What he admitted to removing and destroying were several draft versions of a memo regarding actions they took or failed to take after various terrorist incidents during the Clinton presidency.  The final memo was a whitewash and was left in the archives and presented as "evidence" to the 9/11 commission.  The earlier drafts presuably had both harsher assessments and, more damaging, hand written notes with instructions to change or leave out portions that were too critical.  According to "informed sources" it was those notes that they were desperate to destroy as some were written by Billy Jeff himself.

Rush, on the other hand, thinks Berger put some documents into the archives to create a paper trail to back up false testimony they planned to give.

[A.Hun]

This is an interesting thread...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1711557/posts?page=1

A new UN report seems to be more upbeat than the NIE.

Here is the report itself:

http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/529/76/PDF/N0652976.pdf?OpenElement

[onyx]

OK> Good. I think you're onto something important. It needs a thread of its own.

[Freee-dame]

On FNS, Daniel Benjamin did not answer the questions asked him. Once he referred to what the 911 commission said. Next he said that there was "not enough proof." His third comment began, "I was no longer in the White House, but..." and went on to repeat the appropriate propaganda.

One thing that I heard for the first time today was that Bin Ladin was never a possible target during President Bush's first 8 months, thus he couldn't have "gotten him" as the left keeps complaining. To this comment, Wallace commented on the "failure of will by both presidents." I don't think so, but this comes from the same Chris Wallace who usually refers to ex42 as President Clinton and to the current president as MR. Bush. On this MR vs President topic, I thought it was interesting that Wallace said "Bill Clinton" several times in his commentary on the 4000 emails he got about the interview. This was a prepared statement. Perhaps some of those emails referred to the false impression that ex42 had (pretended to have?) about him.

Michael Scheuer said that the Jusuits taught "If you have to lie, never lie about the facts." He went on to say that the 911 Commission ignored some vital documents and then let no one with the facts about them testify. I guess having Jamie Gorelick decide which documents the commissioners should see might have something to do with this.

[Darth Republican]

I believe producing the ad know the futility of having the UN do anything.

Sorry I meant, "I believe those producing the ad know the futility of having the UN do anything."

[texicali]

Defcon amen re Rudy....he's the only one who gets it

[onyx]

He was awesome and factual!
Need to see him make the rounds of ALL the shows.

[Fishtalk]

.....MY OPINION!!!!!!!

---

Okay, so let me give my opinion. Cause I got one.

The problem with homosexuals as I see it, is not that they prefer members of their own sex. Although, go with me here, that's not the way nature designed it and nature's pretty smart about such things.

But even as they pee upon our feet and tell us it's raining...THEY ALWAYS GO AFTER THE YOUNG BOY FLESH.

Sure they come out with that spin that there's no more homo child predators than hetero child predators but I ain't buying it.

So why do they have "Gay Day" at Disney World? Why don't they get on the rides with the rest of us? Oh, wait...Disney World, synonomous with young kids.

Why do they want to get all involved with the Boy Scouts? Boy Scouts....get it?

I don't trust them and I'll tell you something else, the vast majority of homosexuals do NOT live quiet, loving faithful lives that they'd have us believe. They are promiscuous and disease-spreading. Sure some are devoted and faithful but many, if not most, lives depraved lives.

Sure I believe they are born that way. I know homosexuals via my consulting with a beauty salon. A guy who does hair, go with me here, is usually a bit light in the loafers.

But many blind people are born that way and WE DON'T LET THEM DRIVE A CAR.

Handicapped is handicapped. Homosexuality is a handicap. They should be allowed to live thriving happy lives just as any other American. But they should not be allowed to marry or raise children.

Hey, that's my opinion. And when the vast majority of Americans go into the sanctity of that voting booth, with no PC police screaming at them, they vote AGAINST homosexual marriage.

Cause we get it out here in la-la land. We're not as stupid as they think we are.