Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indicting the NYT
The American Thinker ^ | 9-29-06 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 09/29/2006 7:19:24 AM PDT by Renfield

Henry Mark Holzer, writing in Front Page Magazine, makes the very strong case that the New York Times will be indicted for violating the Espionage Act for publication of details helpful to the enemy in the story of wiretapping of internatrional phone calls involving an American end of the conversation.

I won’t bother to recapitulate his points because he makes them concisely and you should follow the link.

Should indictments be brought, the resulting prosecution and possible trial (I don’t rule out plea agreements once the defendants grasp the prison terms awaiting them and the strength of the case against them) will be a turning point in domestic politics and public opinion.

Liberals will no doubt scream that fascism has arrived in America. I do not rule out a resort to terrorism by the lunatic fringe. The Unabomber sorts. I hope they are few in number and equally isolated.

If that happens, watch for public opinion to turn on the left with fury.

Other outcomes are also possible. A clumsy case could weaken support for necessary anti-terror measures.

But if Holzer is right (and I trust his judgment), we are in for some real fireworks. And Pinch Sulzberger’s problems in destroying his family company’s value will be the least of his worries.

Hat tip: Ed Lasky

Thomas Lifson 9 29 06


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; msm; nyt; sulzberger; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
I've been waiting for this for a very long time.......
1 posted on 09/29/2006 7:19:25 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Link to original article in Front Page Mag:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=24646


2 posted on 09/29/2006 7:20:18 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Is this the October surprise?


3 posted on 09/29/2006 7:20:21 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Go Sooners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Let's hope!


4 posted on 09/29/2006 7:21:00 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
This will help unify both sides and place focus on the WOT just before the election.

How Rovian.

WEG

5 posted on 09/29/2006 7:23:21 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Those who do not know Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. They are the witless." –Khomeni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

I'm waiting for the "THIS SPACE FOR RENT" sign to be posted on their front door.


6 posted on 09/29/2006 7:23:48 AM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

This administratiion just does not have the balls to do it


7 posted on 09/29/2006 7:24:49 AM PDT by Lowell (The voice from beyond the far right edge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.; All
There's also this, from The American Thinker:

NYT view of Tokyo Rose: "Exemplary"



Praise for a traitor. What’s next from Pinch Sulzberger’s paper?

While one might argue that there should be qualms in considering her a “traitor” given the circumstances of being trapped in Japan at an inopportune time (and having to make a living there), can a paper honestly devote precious editorial space to honor someone who propagandized on behalf of the enemy during war?

If one is talking about her post World War 2 “career” she did nothing exceptional to justify praise by the Times. She did not work with the poor, help rehabilitate wounded vets, work in the USO, or other honorable endeavors to redeem her name. A redemption that only the New York Times sees fit to propose.

What next in a few years? An editorial calling for a pardon for John Walker Lindh, the American Taliban?

Don’t laugh.

Ed Lasky 9 29 06

Link to NY Times' shameful article: http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/opinion/29fri4.html&OQ=_rQ3D1&OP=79a9ca07Q2FQ25NcHQ25jQ3CD6sQ3CQ3CQ7BQ7CQ25Q7CddEQ25dQ3DQ25Q7CQ3DQ25Q3CQ2BpQ27pQ3CQ27Q25Q7CQ3DhspeQ7ERQ7Bao
8 posted on 09/29/2006 7:26:19 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lowell

Absentee president.


9 posted on 09/29/2006 7:26:37 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
the New York Times will be indicted

"Should be"? I've heard that.

"Could be"? I've heard that.

But "Will be"? That's a new one!

10 posted on 09/29/2006 7:27:55 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Frankly I doubt it. The NYT is doing an exemplary job of making itself insolvent, so why bother giving the moonbats a rallying point?
11 posted on 09/29/2006 7:30:55 AM PDT by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

I would be very happy to see the NYT finally recieve justice for it's treasonous acts.
But I won't hold my breath.


12 posted on 09/29/2006 7:32:34 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowell
This guy does......

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
13 posted on 09/29/2006 7:33:42 AM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
From the FrontPage article:

“Several years ago Erika Holzer and I wrote a book entitled “Aid and Comfort”: Jane Fonda in North Vietnam, which proved that her conduct in Hanoi made her indictable for, and convictable of, treason.  We discovered that she was not indicted because of a political failure of will by the Nixon administration.”

So I guess the same could be said for Jean Francois Kerry... and his meetings in Paris with the Viet Cong. 

14 posted on 09/29/2006 7:35:34 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

I would love to see Pinchy Salzberger given the perpwalk on TV while the CNN commentators go into meltdown.


15 posted on 09/29/2006 7:36:23 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Down with the NYSlimes?


16 posted on 09/29/2006 7:39:26 AM PDT by wastedyears (Give me Liberty or give me DEATH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

17 posted on 09/29/2006 7:39:49 AM PDT by TChris (The United Nations is suffering from delusions of relevance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

He is also gay.

18 posted on 09/29/2006 7:40:44 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
What next in a few years? An editorial calling for a pardon for John Walker Lindh, the American Taliban?

Take that to the bank!

19 posted on 09/29/2006 7:42:10 AM PDT by Ukiapah Heep (Shoes for Industry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stm

I like it!!!


20 posted on 09/29/2006 7:42:17 AM PDT by wastedyears (Give me Liberty or give me DEATH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson