Unbeliebable our government is supporting this goon via CITGO.
1 posted on
09/28/2006 10:31:20 AM PDT by
finnman69
To: finnman69
now is time for Navy lawyers to find a way to cancel this contract for good. This is a MUST. I hope they are doing everything in their power to get rid of all contracts with CITGO.
2 posted on
09/28/2006 10:33:32 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: finnman69
3 posted on
09/28/2006 10:35:39 AM PDT by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: finnman69
...now is time for Navy lawyers to find a way to cancel this contract for good. They could claim the gasoline has too much SULFUR........
4 posted on
09/28/2006 10:36:25 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Is Castro DEAD YET?........)
To: finnman69
Every contract has an out clause. The Navy needs to just exercise it. What's that assclown going to do, sue us?
5 posted on
09/28/2006 10:38:09 AM PDT by
stm
(Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
To: finnman69
I agree with divestment of Citgo goods.
We could even have an embargo on it but that would require an act of Congress. And would cost jobs. So expect no action until after the election.
My dad was in the oil business and had worked in Libya at times. He was moved to other areas after the mid-1980s.
There were probably people who had business in Cuba or Vietnam that had disruptions.
Maybe people would work more to challenge Hugo Chavez if they considered potential impact.
6 posted on
09/28/2006 10:38:27 AM PDT by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: finnman69
Navy officials point out the original contract was awarded in 1989. That was three years before Chavez launched a coup attempt and ten years before he became President. And we can thank Jimmy Carter for helping Chavez stay in power
7 posted on
09/28/2006 10:38:34 AM PDT by
Mo1
(Hey McCain and Graham .... our soldiers signed up to dodge bullets not lawsuits)
To: finnman69
It would be an interesting contract to peruse. I bet there is something in there about only negotiating with democracies, not dictatorship countries. There's a loop hole somewhere if they want to find it.
To: finnman69
Target practice!14 posted on
09/28/2006 10:53:53 AM PDT by
LIConFem
(Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
To: finnman69
Get rid of CITGO based upon the National Security of the United States of America.
Any other Country would have already done that, and kicked Chavez out of their Country!
15 posted on
09/28/2006 10:55:42 AM PDT by
paratrooper82
(82 Airborne 1/508th BN)
To: finnman69
Unbeliebable our government is supporting this goon via CITGO. This surprises you? How many terrorists do you think the USA has trained and equipped under the guise of Foreign Aid, food for oil and disaster relief? More evidence of your tax dollars at work.
19 posted on
09/28/2006 11:02:38 AM PDT by
Semper Vigilantis
(If you don't ban liberals only liberals will have rights.)
To: finnman69
USN should do like 7-11 and tell them to take their gas and Chavez it.
21 posted on
09/28/2006 11:10:22 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: finnman69
I wanted to post a sign outside the local "Citgo" gas station that reads: Shut Chavez up-don't buy his gas here!
To: finnman69
That aside, now is time for Navy lawyers to find a way to cancel this contract for good.Easy. Stop paying him.
23 posted on
09/28/2006 11:18:06 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
To: finnman69
Have Marathon or BP take over the Naval CITGO stations...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson