Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU to approve Balkan candidates
BBC News ^ | 09/26/2006

Posted on 09/26/2006 12:45:09 AM PDT by Republicain

The European Commission is due to announce the timetable it will adopt for admitting Romania and Bulgaria to the European Union. It is expected that Bucharest and Sofia will be told they can join on 1 January 2007 - but under strict conditions.

They will be checked for progress in curbing organised crime, controlling animal disease and instituting procedures for administering farm aid.

The conditions are tougher than imposed on previous new members, observers say.

The BBC's Oana Lungescu in Strasbourg says they are intended both as a reassurance for EU citizens, only half of whom support further enlargement, and as a warning to Turkey and the Balkan nations still lobbying for EU membership.

The president of the commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, has said the EU cannot go on with further expansion until it decides what to do about its stalled constitution.

Concerns remain

The commission's report, seen by the BBC, should finally confirm that after seven years of talks, Bulgaria and Romania are able to take on the rights and obligations of EU membership next January.

The two countries missed out on the EU's big eastward expansion in 2004.

In an announcement to be made in the European Parliament, the 2007 date is expected to be chosen instead of a 2008 alternative.

Correspondents say the two countries will be delighted that they can get in on schedule before Mr Barroso puts a block on further expansion.

But concerns remain, mainly about Bulgaria.

Unless it cracks down on organised crime, legal decisions taken by its courts could be disregarded in the rest of Europe.

Both countries will have to report every six months on progress in fighting corruption.

By March, they also need to set up agencies to handle millions of euros worth of EU farm aid, or risk losing a quarter of the cash.

Both will face food export bans due to outbreaks of animal diseases like swine fever, while Bulgarian planes could be banned from flying into EU airspace until the country improves its air safety standards.

Streamlining needed

An EU official said the commission did not want to punish Bulgaria and Romania, but to make them work harder to carry out reforms.

Mr Barroso says the EU needs reforms to streamline its decision-making process.

The rules of the European club can currently cope to 27 members at most, though experts say they could be tinkered with to squeeze Croatia in before a major treaty change.

"It would be unwise to bring in other member states apart from Romania and Bulgaria," he said on Monday.

"There are some limits to our absorption capacity."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bulgaria; eu; euenlargement; euexpansion; europe; romania; use

1 posted on 09/26/2006 12:45:10 AM PDT by Republicain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republicain

What's your opinion on this? Too much to digest at the time, or a way too bump the EU's economy?


2 posted on 09/26/2006 12:49:40 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
too to....
3 posted on 09/26/2006 1:07:37 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicain; kronos77

Balkans ping (is Romania Balkan?).


4 posted on 09/26/2006 1:14:58 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Answer: Too much to digest!

But, hey, who cares. As long as the eurocrats get their 3 hour lunch breaks and all the other perks. /sarcasm


5 posted on 09/26/2006 1:41:44 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

They won't develope if they are not integrated into the economics of the rest of europe.

I don't want to have more economic problems in front of our door - so we got to help these guys up and so they can contribute to our common future without losing their identity.


6 posted on 09/26/2006 1:52:40 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Will scania be bought by MAN ?


7 posted on 09/26/2006 1:53:18 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

Don't know. The owners seems to have declined the initial offer.

Obviously Scania is up for grabs evver since the EU commission stopped an all Swedish merger between Scania and Volvo on the trumped up pretence that the new company would have a monopoly position in.....Sweden!

In actual fact this was a move to protect certain German and Italian lorry producers. But then EU an its forerunners was always a protectionistic organisaion and never a free trade area.


8 posted on 09/26/2006 2:25:58 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

But Volvo is now part of Ford as Saab is Part of GM.... that somehow doesn't speak the language of european protectionism.


9 posted on 09/26/2006 2:51:16 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
VW who is a majority share owner of Scania Lorries has declined MAN's offer, so I guess that is that.

As to the other question Volvo (cars not lorries) is owned by Ford, and SAAB is part of GM, that's true. However, SAAB was sold to GM in 1990, well before Sweden's entry into the EU. Volvo sold its car making division (but not lorries) to Ford in 1999, though.

However, my point was that SAAB and Volvo were two small car making companies, in a peripheral country of the EU. The combination of Scania and Volvo lorries would have created a very strong company world wide, and it would definitely have been a strong competitor to some well known brands in some countries very central to the EU. However, not even the combination of the two Swedish companies would have reached a monopoly position in Europe (of course), which is why the Commission had to come up with the inane reason that it would cause problems for Swedish consumers.

This was discussed very intensely in Swedish trade and economics journals at the time, the only link to this story in English that I have been able to find is this one:

http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~dtraca/research/cases/Volvo-Scania.pdf


10 posted on 09/26/2006 6:17:10 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson