Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RICE BOILS OVER AT BUBBA RIPS 'FLATLY FALSE' CLAIM ON BUSH'S BID TO GET BIN LADEN
New York Post ^ | 0-25-06

Posted on 09/25/2006 11:51:28 PM PDT by hope

September 25, 2006 -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday accused Bill Clinton of making "flatly false" claims that the Bush administration didn't lift a finger to stop terrorism before the 9/11 attacks. Rice hammered Clinton, who leveled his charges in a contentious weekend interview with Chris Wallace of Fox News Channel, for his claims that the Bush administration "did not try" to kill Osama bin Laden in the eight months they controlled the White House before the Sept. 11 attacks.

"The notion somehow for eight months the Bush administration sat there and didn't do that is just flatly false - and I think the 9/11 commission understood that," Rice said during a wide-ranging meeting with Post editors and reporters.

"What we did in the eight months was at least as aggressive as what the Clinton

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clarke; clinton; clintoon; condirice; condoleezzarice; dickclarke; flatlyfalse; heliesunderoath; rice; rice2008; richardclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: singfreedom

It was a Sandy Burger statement that the Klinton administration left NO counter terrorism plan for the Bush administration.


41 posted on 09/26/2006 1:18:22 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

clinton lied? ........who'd of thunk it!


42 posted on 09/26/2006 1:33:56 AM PDT by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hope
Give him hell, Condi!


43 posted on 09/26/2006 1:37:22 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil1750

Clinton lies like most people breathe.


44 posted on 09/26/2006 1:37:56 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: phil1750
Seems in an interview with a newspaper in 2002, slick willie stated that there had been NO counter terrorism plan on al qaeda handed over to the new administration.

This man used to be protected by the media. Seems those days are dwindling down to a precious few.

45 posted on 09/26/2006 1:39:56 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hope

She's the perfect one to deliver this message. We need to get her out more making the Administration's case for...well pretty much everything FP related. She's done the big things, but she hasn't been part of the daily sale.


46 posted on 09/26/2006 1:42:50 AM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Romney/Rice '08


47 posted on 09/26/2006 1:43:36 AM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

"...and I hear from the CIA that Clinton's penis is this big"

48 posted on 09/26/2006 1:45:08 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hope
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday accused Bill Clinton of making "flatly false" claims that the Bush administration didn't lift a finger to stop terrorism before the 9/11 attacks.

Bill Clinton told a lie? The hell you say.

49 posted on 09/26/2006 1:51:40 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

"Transitioning to the global war on terror, an animated Rice questioned, "When are we going to stop blaming ourselves for the rise of terrorism?"

I think a lot of people in the UK need to ask that question.


50 posted on 09/26/2006 1:55:00 AM PDT by Mac1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom
Even Clark has changed his story...

Yes, and this is most troubling. I'd regard anything that Clarke said in the past3 years as less reliable than what he said prior to his book's publication. The real legacy building here has been Clarke building his own. Clarke, not Condi, should have responded to Clinton's false claims. But in true Richard Armitage fashion, he has remained silent as lies run wild.

Has Clarke said anything about the interview? Has the MSM pursued him to provide a further defense of Clinton? No way. They've read Clarke's book and know that Clinton's use of it in defense of his actions is seriously flawed.

51 posted on 09/26/2006 2:04:02 AM PDT by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Nice concise time line!


52 posted on 09/26/2006 2:25:13 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: vamoose

Vamoose - You make some excellent points!

Go Condi!!


53 posted on 09/26/2006 2:31:56 AM PDT by aragona (Boycott CITGO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

It's a shame he didn't use that "outrage" on the terrorists in Somalia or after the "Cole" incident!

Actually, you do NOT get it yet either, do you? The reason Clinton is trying to focus on BS like his "outrage" is to keep you from putting it all together.

The purpose of the 9/11 Commission was to muddy the waters, to let people like Jamie Gorelick do your thinking for you and more importantly, thinking for the media.

What Clinton is REALLY worried about is for people to start looking at the precursors to 9/11, the terrorists acts in America that YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT.

If you look up CONSPIRACY THEORY on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

You'll see the JFK assassination is one of them, but two of the more recent ones not listed are the 1995 OKC Federal Building Bombing, and the 1996 TWA 800 Missile Shootdown of an airliner.

Now, the ones I listed above all have a common thread, and that is a democrat President CONTROLLED in the White House.

Not to repeat myself too much, but for simple arguement, let's assume that Bubba got the call that the Federal Building in OKC had been bombed. Let's also assume that Bubba's first words spoken were: "I hope it's NOT Middle Eastern Terrorists!"

Only problem is: IT was Middle Eastern Terrorists and I believe that Bubba was quoted as saying just that.

Now Bubba is a smart man, he immediately recognized that 1994 was a political disaster with Congress now being controlled by Republicans.

To win the election in 1996, He couldn't let YOU know that terrorists killed hundreds in an OKC bombing or he'd have to go to war in Iraq, he's have to defend a Federal Government who LET IT HAPPEN. (I know, you still don't believe that Iraq was tied to the 1993 WTC bombing, but be patient, you will eventually).

Now, how could anyone believe that Iraq was tied to OKC, especially with the NY SLIMES forever telling us Iraq didn't do it, or anything else, much.....? Ever hear of Jayna Davis' book "THE THIRD TERRORIST"?

How is it that she documents dozens of people seeing McVeigh and Nichols togeather with Iraqis in OKC? How is that she submits sworn statements from American Citizens that detail
Iraqi false defectors from Gulf War I?

How is it that experts say that the truck bomb wasn't big enough to destroy the federal building?

How is it that a lawyer's office across the street had his windows blown out, but a building not that much farther from the bomb only had the windows blown out?

How is that seismic traces showed MULTIPLE EXPLOSIONS?

How is that a Federal Investigation concluded McVeigh and Nichols acted all ALONE?

I know, no one in the media has told you yet what to think.

Waiting on Rush Limbaugh?

How About Ann Coulter?

Now, for this thing to get legs YOU have to believe black is black and white is white is ........

WELL BLACK AND WHITE!

Take a look back at Sandy Berger, stuffing TOP SECRET SPECIAL CATAGORY documents in his UNDERWEAR while preparing for the 9/11 Commission! Didn't you think that was a little over the top?

How about ABLE DANGER where an Officer sacrificed his career to let YOU AND ME know that the 9/11 Commission was told about data mining and Atta being identified a year before 9/11/01?

What does it take to get people to THINK?

Let me give you a hint: When the President of the United States makes a HUGE MISTAKE, you can't know about it. Bush isn't going to tell you, Clinton surely isn't going to tell you, and no one in the media has the intestinal fortitude to tell you either, except maybe Jack Cashill.

Cashill has been telling you for years, hasn't he?

And you haven't been thinking for years, have you?

Bubba has been diverting people from thinking for years.

FREEREPUBLIC and DU have a lot in common.


54 posted on 09/26/2006 2:40:01 AM PDT by BILL_C (Those who don't understand the lessons of History are bound to repeat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hope

August 1996--In an interview with The Independent, a London daily, Bin Laden calls the June 1995 truck bomb in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia "the beginning of war between Muslims and the United States." (New York Daily News, 8/11/96)

November 1996--Bin Laden issues an ultimatum to the U.S. and Western countries with troops stationed in Arab countries and declares a holy war against "the enemy."

"Had we wanted to carry out small operations after our threat statement, we would have been able to... We thought that the two bombings in Riyadh and Dhahran would be enough (sic) a signal to the wise U.S. decision-makers to avoid the real confrontation with the Islamic nation, but it seems they did not understand it." (The Washington Times, 11/28/96)

February 1997--Bin Laden threatens holy war against the U.S. in an interview on the British documentary program, Dispatches. "This war will not only be between the people of the two sacred mosques and the Americans, but it will be between the Islamic world and the Americans and their allies because this war is a new crusade led by America against the Islamic nations." (Reuters, 2/20/97)

May 1997--During an interview with CNN, Bin Laden reaffirms his call for a holy war against Americans. "We have focused our declaration of jihad on the U.S. soldiers inside Arabia.... The U.S. government has committed acts that are extremely unjust, hideous and criminal through its support of the Israeli occupation of Palestine." (Reuters, 5/11/97)

February 1998--Bin Laden uses a fatwa, religious decree, to call for the liberation of Muslim holy places in Saudi Arabia and Israel, as well as the death of Americans and their allies. The decree says, "These crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on God, his messenger and Muslims." (The Washington Post, 2/25/98)

March 1998- Bin Laden faxes messages to the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad and U.S. consulates in Peshawar, Lahore, and Karachi threatening to attack U.S. facilities and citizens.

May 1998--Bin Laden announces the formation of an "International Islamic Front for Jihad against America and Israel," according to The News, an Islamabad, Pakistan daily. (The International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism web site, www.ict.org.il)

August 1998--The "International Islamic Front for Jihad against America and Israel," a group sponsored by Bin Laden, issues a warning in the London-based newspaper al-Hayat that, ``strikes will continue from everywhere'' against the United States. (CNN Interactive, 8/20/98)

December 2000, "A National Security Strategy for a Global Age," is the final official assessment of national security policy and strategy by the Clinton team. The final policy paper on national security that President Clinton submitted to Congress — 45,000 words long — makes no mention of al Qaeda and refers to Osama bin Laden by name just four times.

The scarce references to bin Laden and his terror network undercut claims by former White House terrorism analyst Richard A. Clarke that the Clinton administration considered al Qaeda an "urgent threat." (The Washington Times 4/06/04)


55 posted on 09/26/2006 2:48:02 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
Veritas,

Thank you, for jogging our memories, which three cabinet members were held up?

56 posted on 09/26/2006 2:52:50 AM PDT by taildragger (They call themselves Liberal Democrats, I call them Collaborators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Rice's comments were just covered on Fox. It was left to Brian Kilmeade to explain the list of contradictions, while Tiki Barber (dim bulb) says that siince we can't know the truth until years from now when things are de-classified, this is nothing but politics from both sides.

My estimation on Mr. Barber's value to the show just plummeted. He sounded very much like he was entering Julian Phillips' territory.

57 posted on 09/26/2006 3:13:09 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

John Ashcroft was held up, that I know for sure. Also, Louis Freeh resigned and Mueller didn't take over as FBI head until September 10.


58 posted on 09/26/2006 3:14:15 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: hope
Condi's response post Clinton's eruption and talk radio having a field Day with it is interesting.

Clinton reminded us why we do not need another Clinton in the White-house, while Dr. Rice showed her volunteer supporters why in their hearts they are right to work their butts off for her to enter the fray in 08'.

Clinton damaged his wife's chances in the interview while the Rice interview shows thoughtful leadership with an enormously multifaceted problem. Who would you rather have at the helm?

I would love to hear "Section9's" take on this.

59 posted on 09/26/2006 3:16:07 AM PDT by taildragger (They call themselves Liberal Democrats, I call them Collaborators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

Bubba BullS##t Bump!


60 posted on 09/26/2006 3:17:36 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson