Posted on 09/25/2006 4:51:39 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
Chris Wallace (FOX TV) just stated on the Monday morning news segment of Fox TV (aired in the 7:00 a.m. EST hour) that, not only did Bill Clinton retain his anger at Wallace after the interview was over and the cameras were off (despite Wallace trying to part on friendly terms), Clinton absolutely fumed at his own personal staff, right then and there while still on the Fox TV premises, for getting him into the interview with Wallace where he had earlier lost his head.
Wallace said Clinton's blow up at his staff for this mistake was very visible and very audible and very emotional.
If a conservative pol had this kind of extreme outburst with any member of the lib DBM, they would band together and strive to end all possibility for a public career or any public respect for that person..... Bill Clinton is a scumbag who continually gets enabled by a weak and compliant media, yet libs complain about the MSM being too critical of him!!
No, this was when he was first elected, at that time I was extremely politically naive. I had to have seen it on the MSM, which makes it even more remarkable. For some reason I seem to think he was in Arkansas or some other place, not the White House.
hehe The mask is coming off.
When Clinton got mad in the past, people got waxed. Try Jerry Parks, Ron Brown and the White House lawyer in Fort Marcy Park.
Bush could be their next target.
"Wallace said Clinton's blow up at his staff for this mistake was very visible and very audible and very emotional."
By now, I hope the staff are smart enough to avoid trips in small aircraft.
Most especially his skanky wife!
I posted what I thought he was saying/meaning with the bones comment to Chris:
I think he was smirking at him: "So you're getting your bones"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1707266/posts?page=1240#1240
He legecy WILL haunt him FOREVER
Thanks for the correction. Sickening isn't it. Not just the bias but the low class behaviour is so corroding.
Would someone please ask these aholes what specific parts of "The Path to 911" were untrue and what exactly did Sandy Berger steal and destroy from the National Archives?
Clinton is a kook, pure and simple.
Yes! And he was totally "out of control". Not one of his best moments. Of course from our perspective he really has had many if any. Thanks.
Am I the only person in America who doesn't have a clue? What did the interviewer ask Clinton? And how did he respond?
Demagogues are going offensive!! Howie Dean is ballistic over the eviiiilllll FoxNews making poor ol' Bill Clinton go ballistic...... Please see my #9 post at FR link below for the outrageous email Howie Dean sent out to the DNC list today (no, I would never donate to those scumbags, I just got on their email list to monitor what they are up to - actually, I have tried several times to get them to REMOVE me but they just won't let go of my address!!).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1707974/posts?page=1
Anyway, Howie Dean is on the offensive and even has a special link already for their "offense" strategy:
http://www.democrats.org/playingoffense
The reprimand was planned as well as the tirade. It was planned and staged. Everything this guy does is for effect. Remember, this is the same guy who staged the stone cross at Normandy. The same guy who when caught laughing while leaving Ron Brown's funeral, changed those smiles to tears for the cameras. I don't buy his claims that he was set up. With all the media hullaballoo, complaints and threats to ABC from him, his administration members, and the Democrats over the content of the movie "The Path to 9/11," it's incredulous to believe that he didn't think he'd ever be asked a single question about his role in hunting down bin Laden. The man was well prepared for his tirade yesterday.
Clinton knew what he was doing when he showed up there. In fact, he probably set this whole interview up. That interview was Clinton's attempt to bash Bush and bash FOX News.
We're Going on Offense
We're sick of playing defense against a Republican leadership that thinks nothing of using the national security issue in the game of political partisanship. We are not going to be pushed around, spun, or defamed by right-wing extremists or those whom they use to disseminate their propaganda.
So, just like President Clinton, we're going to go on the offense -- telling the truth and never backing down against the smear tactics of those who have failed to make our country safer.
We're going to fight for the Democratic vision on national security -- will you make a donation to help fund the plan?
It would be interesting to know just when the link for the Demagogues' outrage (see post #556 above) was actually set up - i.e., was it before or immediately after Bill Clinton's tirade, because that would certainly indicate pre-planning. Anyone know how to determine when a certain page on the DNC website appeared? It is this one:
http://www.democrats.org/playingoffense
Would love to know when they decided to "play offense" etc. Normally it would take at least some hours if not days to decide to create such a new donation page with its own link, so it might be revealing if they had this thing all ready to go when Clinton appeared.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.