Posted on 09/19/2006 7:37:42 PM PDT by Jean S
Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe has told business associates and Democratic donors that he will chair Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) presidential campaign next year, according to several Democratic sources.
Together, Clinton, the favorite to win the Democratic nomination, and McAuliffe, the top money man in Democratic politics, have a good chance of raising $100 million before the first official contest, the Iowa caucuses in January 2008.
While Clinton and her staff insist she is focused solely on winning reelection in New York this November, the decision over who will be in charge of getting her elected to the White House is already settled.
McAuliffe told The Hill yesterday that Clinton has not made a decision on running for president and will not do so until after Nov. 7. McAuliffe also denied telling friends that he will serve as chairman, although sources contradict him.
He acknowledged that he would play a “huge role” in her presidential campaign if it materializes and that he has recruited donors for a possible White House run.
“I would just say that I hope she runs,” said McAuliffe. “She’s focused on the Senate and I’m focused on helping Democrats.
“Would I have a huge role on the campaign? Of course, that’s not real news. People know that I have has been around lining up people if she decides to run.”
Clinton referred questions to her Senate campaign, where spokeswoman Ann Lewis said, “There is no decision, there is no [presidential] campaign; if there is no campaign there are no titles.”
Clinton’s camp is not the only one among presidential hopefuls lining up donors for 2008. Allies of each of the Democratic contenders are aggressively seeking commitments because of the huge amount of money that will be needed next year.
McAuliffe, who became DNC chairman in 2001, said he has had no conversations with Clinton about titles and that Democrats are merely speculating about the role he would serve in the campaign.
Since he stepped down as DNC chairman after the 2004 election, he has been involved with about a dozen private companies by his own estimate. He said he has raised money for investment funds and real estate deals, and even dabbled in the energy sector. He has also served on the advisory board of Carret Asset Management, an investment firm in New York.
But McAuliffe said he would quickly drop these commitments to help Clinton if she ran for president.
“I would take off time and go full time,” he said of his expected level of commitment.
Early next year, around the time Clinton is expected to launch an exploratory campaign committee, McAuliffe’s new book “ What a Party!: My Life Among Democrats” is expected to be in stores. It will span McAuliffe’s 25 years in politics and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of his party, including the successes of the Clinton presidency.
Although McAuliffe’s specialty is raising money, he would probably not be satisfied serving only as Clinton’s presidential finance chairman.
“To be finance chair would be beneath him,” said one Democratic donor close to Clinton, who added that McAuliffe is “trying to make his presence felt” in moneyed Democratic circles.
No Democratic fundraiser has as high a profile as McAuliffe. Nevertheless, he may be feeling some competition from the many Clinton allies who are positioning themselves as important financial players for her presidential campaign.
“She’s got a full operation,” said Wade Randlett, a prominent Democratic fundraiser based in San Francisco, of the network of Democrats who are laying the financial groundwork for Clinton in the Bay Area. “There are many, many friends who are active for her.”
Randlett said donors who have met Clinton leave the room certain that she will run for president. He said the same clear impression is given by two other hopefuls, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner (D).
“For Kerry, for Warner, and for Hillary, they are all a certainty,” said Randlett. “People leaving the room all think she’s running for president.”
Randlett also said Bay Area donors have been told that Clinton will not visit there again between now and Election Day so as not to compete for campaign contributions in a Democratic fundraising hub with candidates running for the House and Senate.
Democratic fundraisers report that all politicians with an eye on the White House have been vigorously recruiting donors for primary season. That’s because the Democrats have front-loaded the season even more than in 2004.
With key contests crammed into the first few weeks of 2008, giving the early front-runner the chance to eliminate rivals almost in a fell swoop, there is a premium on raising primary money next year ready to hit the early races in a winter avalanche.
“People are going to have to telescope and enormous amount of fundraising in a very short period of time,” said Steve Grossman, a Democratic fundraiser who served as DNC chairman under Clinton. “In my judgment, if you can’t raise the better part of $50 million, you’re not going to be a first tier candidate.
Given Clinton’s stature and McAuliffe’s stature as a fundraiser, Republicans have little doubt that she will have close to $100 million in her presidential campaign coffers at the end of next year.
Raising that amount of money in the year before an election year would not be unprecedented. The Bush-Cheney ’04 campaign reported $99.1 million in its account at the end of 2003.
“There’s a growing consensus that the top-tier candidates of both political parties are going to opt out of the public financing for the general election as well as the primaries, which [would be] the first time in history that has occurred,” said Federal Election Commission Chairman Michael Toner.
If candidates forego public funding for the 2008 presidential primary and general elections, they will be able to collect contributions for both elections as soon as they form exploratory committees.
Said Toner: “The higher contribution limits of [the] McCain-Feingold [campaign finance law] combined with candidates raising money for general and primary combined with a polarized electorate sets the stage for record-breaking fundraising.”
So the worst loser in Democrat political history is back! Good new for out side.
At last, some good news! He's as clumsy politically as he is corrupt.
Heh. Mr. Personality in charge of Hillary's campaign.
Oh boy, lots of material for Jay Leno! I'll have to set the record button so I don't miss his monologues during the campaign.
Lady, looks like you better get a few other things on that mug 'punched' because that offshore bargain basement facelift is wearing off!
Hehe, are you sure? If we hold both houses in November it may be Dean... you know, second term and all that.
The rough tough New York media will never let her get away with this!!
Yo Terry, whatever happened to your $18 million illegal ill-gotten gain from the now defunct Global Crossing? You're a criminal, Terry! You traded an IPO while not even having the qualifications of a stockbroker. You should be behind bars with the hildebeast instead of loaning the morally-corrupt, ethically-challenged clintoons $3 million of the ill-gotten $18 million.
Hillary Clinton running for president is a win-win situation for the left. If she wins, fine. If she loses, then they get a left candidate from the GOP, which may be even better in the long run.
Uh, Howard Dean?
This is Dean's 1st election. McAwful was there for losing the White House in 2000 and 2004 and the in 2002 Senate. So far McAwfuls record is worse.
Terry McAwful back on the scene. Let the games begin.
but he might be the best cheater.
The guy is a jerk, but as a rabid, feral, nut-case, far-left looney--HE SURE CAN RAISE A LOT OF MONEY!! That's all that matters to Hilarity.
Bring it on loosers.
I had tried to forget these names...McAuliffe...Lewis...Clinton...guess we'll be hearing them again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.