Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coverage Of 9/11 Was Too Wimpy (Mark Steyn On The Feminized 9/11 Remembrance Fetish Alert)
Chicago Sun Times ^ | 09/17/06 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/17/2006 4:01:16 AM PDT by goldstategop

A lot of the 9/11 anniversary coverage struck me as distastefully tasteful. On the morning of Sept. 12, I was pumping gas just off I-91 in Vermont and picked up the Valley News. Its lead headline covered the annual roll call of the dead -- or, as the alliterative editor put it, "Litany of the Lost." That would be a grand entry for Litany of the Lame, an anthology of all-time worst headlines. Sept. 11 wasn't a shipwreck: The dead weren't "lost," they were murdered.

So I skipped that story. Underneath was something headlined "Half a Decade Gone By, A Reporter Still Cannot Comprehend Why." Well, in that case maybe you shouldn't be in the reporting business. After half a decade, it's not that hard to "comprehend": Osama bin Laden issued a declaration of war and then his agents carried out a big attack. He talked the talk, his boys walked the walk. If you need to flesh it out a bit, you could go to the library and look up a book.

But, of course, that's not what the headline means: Instead, it's "incomprehensible" in the sense that, to persons of a certain mushily "progressive" disposition, all such acts are "incomprehensible," all violence is "senseless." Unfortunately, it made perfect sense to the fellows who perpetrated it. Which is what that headline writer finds hard to "comprehend" -- or, rather, doesn't wish to comprehend. The piece itself was categorized as "Reflection" -- dread word. No self-respecting newspaper should be running "reflections" anywhere upfront of Section G Page 27, and certainly not on the front page. But it has exactly the kind of self-regarding pseudo-sophistication the American media love. The proper tone for 9/11 commemorations is to be sad about all the dead -- "the lost" -- but in a very generalized soft-focus way. Not a lot of specifics about the lost, and certainly not too many quotes from those final phone calls from the passengers to their families, like Peter Hanson's last words before Flight 175 hit the World Trade Center: "Don't worry, Dad. If it happens, it will be very fast." That might risk getting readers worked up, especially if they see the flight manifest:

"Peter Hanson, Massachusetts

"Susan Hanson, Massachusetts

"Christine Hanson, 2, Massachusetts"

No, best to stick to a limpidly fey, tastefully mopey, enervatedly passive prose style that suggests nothing very much can be done about the incomprehensible lost. This tasteful passivity is the default mode of the age: Five years ago it was striking, even in the immediate aftermath, how many radio and TV trailers for blood drives and other relief efforts could only bring themselves over the soupy music track to refer vaguely to "the tragic events," as if any formulation more robust might prove controversial.

Passivity is far slyer and more lethal than rabid Bush hatred. Say what you like about the left-wing kooks but they can still get a good hate on. Sure, they hate Bush and Cheney and Rummy and Halliburton and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh rather than Saddam and the jihadists, but at least they can still muster primal emotions. Every morning I wake up to a gazillion e-mails from fellows wishing me ill, usually beginning by calling me a "chicken hawk" followed by a generous smattering of words I can only print here peppered with asterisks, and usually ending with pledges to come round and shove various items in a particular part of my anatomy. There's so much shipping scheduled to go up there I ought to get Dubai Ports World in to run it.

The foaming leftie routine seems to be a tough sell to a general audience. I see that, a mere three weeks after I guest-hosted for Rush, the widely acclaimed and even more widely unlistened-to Air America is going belly up. Coincidence? You be the judge. But I doubt the "liberal" radio network would be kaput if anti-Bush fever were about to sweep the Democrats to power this November. I think I said a few months back that the Dems would be waking up to their usual biennial Wednesday morning after the Tuesday night before, and I'll stick with that.

But there's more to the national discourse than party politics. And, whoever wins or loses, the cult of feebly tasteful passivity rolls on regardless. As part of National Review's fifth anniversary observances, James Lileks wrote the following:

"If 9/11 had really changed us, there'd be a 150-story building on the site of the World Trade Center today. It would have a classical memorial in the plaza with allegorical figures representing Sorrow and Resolve, and a fountain watched over by stern stone eagles. Instead there's a pit, and arguments over the usual muted dolorous abstraction approved by the National Association of Grief Counselors. The Empire State Building took 18 months to build. During the Depression. We could do that again, but we don't. And we don't seem interested in asking why."

Ray Nagin, New Orleans' Mayor Culpa, is a buffoon but he nevertheless had a point when he scoffed at the ongoing hole in the ground in Lower Manhattan. And whatever fills it is never going to include those "stern stone eagles." The best we can hope for is that the Saudi-funded Islamic Outreach Center will only take up a third of the site. But in our hearts we know whatever memorial eventually stands on the spot will be rubbish -- tasteful rubbish, but rubbish all the same. Last year, I criticized the Flight 93 memorial, the "Crescent of Embrace," whose very title is a parodic masterpiece of note-perfect generically effete huggy-weepy blather. And in return I received a ton of protests pointing out that the families of the Flight 93 heroes had "approved" the design. All that demonstrates, I think, is how thoroughly constrained our society is within its own crescent of embrace: The cult of passivity has insinuated itself deep into our bones. Behind those "IMAGINE PEACE" stickers lies a terrible failure to imagine.

At what point does a society become simply too genteel to wage war? We're like those apocryphal Victorian matrons who covered up the legs of their pianos. Acts of war against America have to be draped in bathetic music and uncomprehending reflections and crescents of embrace. We fight tastefully, too. Last week one of America's unmanned drones could have killed 200 Taliban big shots but they were attending a funeral and we apparently have a policy of not killing anybody near cemeteries out of sensitivity. So even our unmanned drones are obliged to behave with sensitivity. But then, these days the very soundtrack to our society is, so to speak, an unmanned drone.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; chicagosuntimes; feminizedremebrance; girlymanamerica; marksteyn; martialvalor; newyorkcity; sensitivitybs; steyn; toowimpy; wherearethemen; wherestheangergone; wtctowers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last
To: FreedomPoster

Thanks for posting that! Wow! I hope to be the kind of American he is talking about.


81 posted on 09/17/2006 4:50:05 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (After the nun-slaying, don't forget to use sneer quotes when you talk about the "Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: livius
Ever notice how an attack on the United States has been turned into an exercise in victimology, with the survivors' of the victims firmly in control of what happens next?

ULB didn't tell Muhammed Atta to fly a plane into Tower 1 to kill Nunzio Bagadonuts. He ordered an attack on a symbol, and nerve center of America's economy [just as the Pentagon and whatever the terrorists on Flight 93 had for a target were chosen]. So now, every year we have a reading of the victim's names [the heroes were the firemen and cops who ran into the towers, individuals known but to God who undertook heroic deeds, and the passengers on Flight 93].

Do you recall an annual reading of the names of those killed at Pearl Harbor? Do you recall that in the middle of a war on two fronts, Pearl Harbor was operational almost immediately, up to speed in six months, and that most of the salvagable ships were in action by 1943?

Now look at the Trade Center. Five years plus, nothing but a hole in the ground, captive to competing interest groups and sensitivity rising to the level of incapacity. Enough. The towers should be rebuilt taller than they were. Put a tasteful reflective pool and monument on the grounds. Have a moment of silence every year. But let's get back to remembering this was an attack, this is a war, the time for national grief is past, and there's Al Quaeda ass to be kicked.
82 posted on 09/17/2006 4:51:41 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I don't believe it's gender-specific. If you know anything about Myers-Briggs personality profile tests, it's a case of whether your emotions or your intellect rules your outlook. Men and women can both fall into that category. That's the bottom line for me.


83 posted on 09/17/2006 4:53:31 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Some pray for peace; I pray for VICTORY that will ensure it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

one of Steyn's best - and that says a lot.


84 posted on 09/17/2006 4:54:56 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
Men and women can both fall into either category.
85 posted on 09/17/2006 4:55:32 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Some pray for peace; I pray for VICTORY that will ensure it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Re: Moral clarity.

In case you're not familiar with it, I want to post Natan Scharnsky's "moral clarity" quote, from The Case For Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror. Even if you are familiar with it, others should see it, as I think it is extremely sublime.

"Over the years, I have come to understand a critical difference between the world of fear and the world of freedom. In the former, the primary challenge is finding the inner strength to confront evil. In the latter, the primary challenge is finding the moral clarity to see evil."

Unfortunately, far too many in the West are willing to see and call out evil.

God bless and protect your son, and all like him. I firmly believe that we, as a country, are attempting the right thing, the moral thing, with what we attempt in the Middle East, with Iraq. I expect and believe that if we are not successful, we will end up creating the glass parking lots many have called for, before it is over.

86 posted on 09/17/2006 5:13:03 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

I skipped watching and reading anything that day . I saw 9/11 happen before my eyes . That's all I needed to know . Once my enemy is dead and unable to harm me and my friends and family , then I will take time to morn and take time to perhps think about such silly nonsense as "root causes" . I've educate dmyself as to what is happening to America and the world . Morn the dead AfTEr the war is won.


87 posted on 09/17/2006 5:16:52 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
Do you recall an annual reading of the names of those killed at Pearl Harbor?

Good point. I read a horrible account of Pearl Harbor a few years ago that said that for weeks after the attack, soldiers and sailors training on the beach had to run past upturned hulls where they could hear trapped sailors tapping to have someone notice them and get them out. We didn't have the fuel to power the torches that would have been required to cut a battleship's hull and we didn't have the time or the manpower to expend on rescuing them at that time. So our soldiers and sailors had to run past that beach, where the tapping kept up for weeks and declined and finally stopped altogether, while they got up to speed for WWII.

88 posted on 09/17/2006 5:17:27 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Make that:

Unfortunately, far too many in the West are *un*willing to see and call out evil.


89 posted on 09/17/2006 5:19:26 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Great post man , thanks so much . I visit Holland every year and I get so depressed at times there . I love the country but the insane , blind anti American hatred is too much. Leftist propaganda has been massively effective in Europe. Most believe the most inane bullsh*t .Facts and evidence are missing in most arguments I've had there. Europe has a big mouth ever since the Big Bear of Communist Russia was slapped down by Regan .Just wait though . One BIG terrorist even in Western Europe and American will become it's big brother/buddy again. History repeats itself over and over again. I do however try to remind my European friends that MANY MANY Americans will not be willing to bail out Europe again . It's not 1940 anymore..The dutch seem to be coming around a bit the last 2 years but it may be too late as the Islamic population there swells beyond belief.
90 posted on 09/17/2006 5:23:42 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tioga

He already has apologized.


91 posted on 09/17/2006 5:25:50 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sonic109
He said he was sorry they were offended, he did not go so far as to retract the quote he made. There is a difference......albeit subtle.
92 posted on 09/17/2006 5:31:41 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: tioga

I understand that he also said his statement didn"t reflect HIS personal opinion of Islam. Ok , so it's a %99 apology ..He should never have done that . I though for once someone in authority was showing the guts to call a spade a spade.Why is the world so damned afraid of these barbarians? Now even the Pope has to go PC on us.


93 posted on 09/17/2006 5:52:27 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Stegall Tx
That mailbox deserves a thread of its own.

"Please understand, it is not my position that is tenuous and subject to criticism, but yours. In view of the hate mail which your article has triggered, I must now take off valuable time from my work to consult with legal authorities about the article itself."

- A K Dewdney

MARK REPLIES: My mistake. From the hours you’ve devoted to those conspiracies, I assumed your work time wasn’t in the least bit valuable.

That's gonna leave a 'mark'.

94 posted on 09/17/2006 6:00:15 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EmilyGeiger

It was his first time to fill in for Rush, and he was fantastic!


95 posted on 09/17/2006 6:02:25 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

#47 BUMP!

God bless this fine Scot and may he as soon as he can gather his family to himself, emigrate from his dead, decadent and increasingly degenerate socialist state and come and join US. He is already an American in his heart -- the first and most important place to be one!

<< ... I have realized what sets your average American apart. An American is a citizen ... >>

Close but no Christmas box.

An American is just that, "an American."

Every American is sovereign, neither the subject of any ruler nor the citizen of any state.

We the (American) people, ARE the American Nation!

WE are our beloved fraternal republic.

And, as for storming cockpits, even Winston Spencer Churchill was way more American than he was a Brit.

Neville Chamberlain was a Brit.


96 posted on 09/17/2006 6:23:22 PM PDT by Brian Allen ("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"And the chickification of the media only reveals this trend will in fact worsen."

Also note a more sly attempt to downgrade able-bodied caucasian men. Virtually every commercial is now casting a woman as the strong character and the able bodied caucasian man as either a buffoon or a meek bystander. Of course, if it's a handicapped man or a gay man or a black man or an Oriental man, he's either a hero or involved in solving the issue. D'white guy? He's watching, clueless.


97 posted on 09/17/2006 7:39:04 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EmilyGeiger

"I missed the day he guest hosted for Rush!!! Did he do a good job?"

Once you got past his accent, he was EXCEPTIONAL!!!!!! I hope Rush goes away more often and has Steyn guest host for him each time, although I also like the other guest hosts. Why not Thomas Sowell some time? He's great.


98 posted on 09/17/2006 7:55:54 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

"How can anyone, with a clear mind, possibly come up with any other explanation?"

You pinpointed the issue. They do not have a clear mind on this issue. They are blinded with partisan hate and have developed a construct that they hope they can sell in their attempts to cast aspersions on the Republicans thus shifting the scales in their Dim favor. The do know what happened but they won't openly say it.


99 posted on 09/17/2006 8:03:36 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
And yes, the daughter does watch TV all the time -- so -- how could this *radical misunderstanding* of the facts happen?

Oh, I think this is easy. Unless one specifically looks for programs about 9-11, one is very unlikely to hear much about it on tv. People just don't talk in detail about what happened. The girl was 17 when it happened, maybe mom and dad wanted to protect her from endless newscasts, or maybe she found the news upsetting and didn't watch.

100 posted on 09/17/2006 8:17:42 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson