Nothing like setting the stage. Thanks to Al Gore I expect we'll see this every election from now on.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: blogblogginaway
It's the Bush/Diebold conspiracy.
Yawn.
2 posted on
09/16/2006 8:11:46 PM PDT by
IncPen
(Bush Iraq Truth WMD http://freedomkeys.com/whyiraq.htm)
To: blogblogginaway
This will of course only happen in Minority neighborhoods in Blue States where Democrats control the balloting and they oppose showing ID to vote.
3 posted on
09/16/2006 8:12:35 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
("For seven million extra, we could have avoided a billion dollar WOT.")
To: blogblogginaway
There is only ONE solution to this problem. Lock up ALL "lawyers" six months prior to our elections and do not release them until six months after the ballots have been counted. Works for me.
5 posted on
09/16/2006 8:17:14 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
To: blogblogginaway
seriously...I breifly saw this on the front page of USA Today on Thursday, a few days after they were reporting surging JA numbers for the President as well as a narrowing of the gap for November's races...the excuses are beginning...
6 posted on
09/16/2006 8:18:53 PM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: blogblogginaway
Nothing like setting the stage. Thanks to Al Gore I expect we'll see this every election from now on. Needed to be repeated, because it sums it all up.
7 posted on
09/16/2006 8:22:00 PM PDT by
NurdlyPeon
(Wearing My 'Jammies Proudly)
To: blogblogginaway
It means the GOP is looking good.
9 posted on
09/16/2006 8:32:29 PM PDT by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: blogblogginaway
An overhaul in how states and localities record votes and administer elections since the Florida recount battle six years ago has created conditions that could trigger a repeat -- this time on a national scale -- of last week's Election Day debacle in the Maryland suburbs, election experts said. And all of this because of a hoax Al Gore played on the nation in 2000. We can indeed expect this in every election, especially if RATS lose. I expect all will be well if they win.
To: blogblogginaway
I have always had a problem with electronic voting and paper ballot voting. Each is no better than the security that "guarantees" it as being valid. I would like a combination of both. Use electronics to cast your vote and a paper ballot that goes into a sealed box under the custody of the law and both parties. It should take three people to open them. I would like the paper ballot to be a print out of what the voter just voted for and the voter will then exam the paper print out and sign it and put it in the ballot box. If there is any question about the validity of the electronic vote the ballot boxes will then be opened and counted.
The real crime in the Florida Elections was when Gore gained several thousand votes on the second electronic count. If you know anything about statistics you know this was quite impossible. When dealing with votes by the millions the votes a candidate picks up and loses on the second counting of the ballot cards (actually computer punch cards) will cancel each other out. That second count should have resulted in each candidate actually losing a few votes as each run of the cards will damage a few. They should lose in equal percentages. There was a massive attempt to stuff the ballots in Florida and Gore almost got away with it.
13 posted on
09/16/2006 8:34:28 PM PDT by
cpdiii
(Socialism is popular with the ruling class. It gives legitimacy to tyranny and despotism.)
To: blogblogginaway
caused long lines and delays in vote-counting. I admit to taking the above out of context.
What I would like to know is why some of the same people will wait in line for 30 minutes or longer at a WalMart sale and then scream about the long lines at the polls if they have to wait any time at all to vote?
What do voters want? A drive thru lane equipped with a machine that reads their thoughts and records their vote?
Anyone who is too lazy to go to the polls and vote, even if there is a delay, should just keep quiet.
14 posted on
09/16/2006 8:41:16 PM PDT by
jerry639
To: blogblogginaway
HMMM, polls show momentum swinging in the Republican's direction and a flood of preemptive stories about faulty voting machines hits the MSM?
15 posted on
09/16/2006 8:42:06 PM PDT by
msnimje
(Terror Deniers + Holocaust Deniers = A Match made in Hell.)
To: blogblogginaway
Of course, now that opinion polls are beginning to show that the American people still don't want to trust the lives of their children and grandchildren to dims, dims are trotting out Plan B.
16 posted on
09/16/2006 8:46:31 PM PDT by
Let's Roll
( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
To: blogblogginaway
Thanks to Al Gore I expect we'll see this every election from now on. Only close ones that the DIMs lose.
19 posted on
09/16/2006 9:07:32 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
To: blogblogginaway
These new voting machines have the potential to make our vote null and voild. The potential for abuse is massive. And there is no paper trail to fall back on.
20 posted on
09/16/2006 9:38:11 PM PDT by
Revel
To: blogblogginaway
In Iraq voters had to dodge bombs, bullets, and terrorist threats just to reach the voting booth. And they voted in larger percentages than those who voted in American elections.
These whiners make me sick. And now they're whining well ahead of time.
21 posted on
09/16/2006 9:39:11 PM PDT by
lowbridge
(I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
To: blogblogginaway
I think they'd rather us not use any voting methods, instead the best solution is to find an ACLU judge to just elect the Democrats.
The added benefit is the media wouldn't have to work so darn hard to convince the ignorant that the country under Republicans is doomed.
22 posted on
09/16/2006 9:40:37 PM PDT by
soloNYer
To: blogblogginaway
Major Problems At Polls Feared Planned.
24 posted on
09/16/2006 9:59:11 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
To: blogblogginaway
Heh, heh, heh. We will cheat you blind. Actually since this is a change those least capable of embracing the change will do badly. And we know who the stupid vote for.
Can you say LANDSLIDE.
25 posted on
09/16/2006 10:01:21 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: blogblogginaway
What? You mean the Dem's can't use names off tombstones to vote. Now that's a disaster.
27 posted on
09/16/2006 10:07:11 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: blogblogginaway
What? You mean the Dem's can't use names off tombstones to vote. Now that's a disaster. And all those hanging Chads. They can't do without those.
28 posted on
09/16/2006 10:07:51 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: blogblogginaway
Paper ballots, govt. issued picture i.d., record the number on a list of actual living, legal voters who cared enough to vote...
31 posted on
09/16/2006 10:23:35 PM PDT by
185JHP
( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson