1 posted on
09/14/2006 11:14:12 AM PDT by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: lowbridge
I guess she thinks we should take a first nuclear strike as well? Let's just shut down the new anti-missile shield programs. /sarc
2 posted on
09/14/2006 11:15:23 AM PDT by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: lowbridge
So People Must Die before we'll allowed limited surveillance of our enemies. Have I got a response for that one.
3 posted on
09/14/2006 11:16:49 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: lowbridge
Well...by my logic...we have already been attacked. Surveil away!!
4 posted on
09/14/2006 11:16:49 AM PDT by
truthluva
("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
To: lowbridge
Ms. Wilson, why don't you sponsor a bill providing Body Bags for every American citizen so we'll have the peace of mind in knowing that we will be cataloged properly. "Our graves need no flowers. The tapes have recorded our names."
5 posted on
09/14/2006 11:17:04 AM PDT by
massgopguy
(massgopguy)
To: lowbridge
INSANE!..........
6 posted on
09/14/2006 11:17:08 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Is Castro dead yet?........)
To: lowbridge
How do we end up with these $hit-for-brains people in Congress?
7 posted on
09/14/2006 11:17:42 AM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: lowbridge
Does this idiot recall 911 or perhaps she didn't have a family member murdered in that attack? One more member of the stuck on stupid crowd in a position over her head.
To: lowbridge
This can't possibly get anywhere...can it? OK, I accept the bill, as long as it includes painting a huge bullseye over the house with the words "Hit Us First", so the American people can fight terrorists as they see fit.
To: lowbridge
And even if we do capture terror suspects, when we eventually try them, Senator Lindsay Graham wants to make sure their defense attorneys get complete access to all the national security methods used in capturing them. Benedict Arnold sure could have used his help in giving away West Point to the British.
12 posted on
09/14/2006 11:23:05 AM PDT by
lowbridge
(I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
To: lowbridge
The president's constitutional war powers were debated and defined in the convention in 1787:
"FRIDAY AUGUST 17th. IN CONVENTION
...Mr. MADISON and Mr. GERRY moved to insert "declare," striking out "make" war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.
Mr. SH[E]RMAN thought it stood very well. The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence war."
The vote was 7 to 1.
Now congress would amend the Constitution by mere law, as the Supreme Court has amended it by mere fiat.
The Founders were wasting their time by debating the president's inherent constitutional power to repel sudden attacks.
15 posted on
09/14/2006 11:26:49 AM PDT by
mrsmith
To: lowbridge
Is this the one who is in a tight reelection race?
16 posted on
09/14/2006 11:27:11 AM PDT by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: lowbridge
Umm. We've already been hit by a terrorist attack. Maybe she slept through 9-11.
17 posted on
09/14/2006 11:30:01 AM PDT by
Maceman
(This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
To: lowbridge
This stupid RINO defies explanation.
18 posted on
09/14/2006 11:31:50 AM PDT by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: lowbridge
Where are all of our "Party over Principle" types on this one...
22 posted on
09/14/2006 11:35:24 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(Quam terribilis est haec hora)
To: lowbridge
Rep. Heather Wilson, one of eight Republicans, received a 100% rating from CAIR for supporting its interests. Well, there you go.
To: lowbridge
Congress-critter Heather Wilson sounds like she's trying to edge out Senator Patty Murray as stupidest person to ever serve in Congress.
Can someone lead her away from the floor ~ just take her outside ~ turn her loose.
26 posted on
09/14/2006 11:45:00 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: lowbridge
Republicans are proposing a bill that says we can't initiate surveillance until after we've been struck by a terrorist attack. I hoe they are just drafting this hoping to get moonbats to vote for it.
To: lowbridge
It's not only this dimwit broad. Look at her Co-Sponsers?!?
- Rep Everett, Terry [AL-2] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Hoekstra, Peter [MI-2] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Johnson, Nancy L. [CT-5] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] - 7/27/2006
- Rep Myrick, Sue [NC-9] - 7/27/2006
- Rep Ramstad, Jim [MN-3] - 7/20/2006
- Rep Renzi, Rick [AZ-1] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Rogers, Mike (MI) [MI-8] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Schwarz, John J.H. "Joe" [MI-7] - 7/27/2006
- Rep Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [WI-5] - 7/18/2006
- Rep Thornberry, Mac [TX-13] - 7/18/2006
Sensenbrenner????? WTF?!?
btw, I went to Thomas and read HR 5825. However without having the FISA law in front of you, you really can't make heads or tails out of the Bill with all the 'insert 'x', delete 'y' and replace 'z'.
But it definitely has the 'after being attacked' nonsense in it. And in two places.
31 posted on
09/14/2006 11:48:54 AM PDT by
Condor51
("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
To: lowbridge
I don"t understand, I just don't understand. This is absurd.
35 posted on
09/14/2006 11:57:07 AM PDT by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade)
To: lowbridge
So, following these nut-job Republican's logic, after our next attack, we'll have another worthless congressional investigation, aka 9/11 Commission, stacked with many who were/are responsible for our ineptness in defending ourselves, blaming nobody??
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson