Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/13/republicans-fight-bush-on-terror-tactics/

http://sayanythingblog.com/2006/09/14/who_the_terror_apologists_support/index.php

1 posted on 09/14/2006 11:14:12 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: lowbridge

I guess she thinks we should take a first nuclear strike as well? Let's just shut down the new anti-missile shield programs. /sarc


2 posted on 09/14/2006 11:15:23 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

So People Must Die before we'll allowed limited surveillance of our enemies. Have I got a response for that one.


3 posted on 09/14/2006 11:16:49 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Well...by my logic...we have already been attacked. Surveil away!!


4 posted on 09/14/2006 11:16:49 AM PDT by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Ms. Wilson, why don't you sponsor a bill providing Body Bags for every American citizen so we'll have the peace of mind in knowing that we will be cataloged properly. "Our graves need no flowers. The tapes have recorded our names."
5 posted on 09/14/2006 11:17:04 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
INSANE!..........
6 posted on 09/14/2006 11:17:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

How do we end up with these $hit-for-brains people in Congress?


7 posted on 09/14/2006 11:17:42 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Does this idiot recall 911 or perhaps she didn't have a family member murdered in that attack? One more member of the stuck on stupid crowd in a position over her head.


10 posted on 09/14/2006 11:20:58 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This can't possibly get anywhere...can it? OK, I accept the bill, as long as it includes painting a huge bullseye over the house with the words "Hit Us First", so the American people can fight terrorists as they see fit.


11 posted on 09/14/2006 11:21:43 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
And even if we do capture terror suspects, when we eventually try them, Senator Lindsay Graham wants to make sure their defense attorneys get complete access to all the national security methods used in capturing them.

Benedict Arnold sure could have used his help in giving away West Point to the British.

12 posted on 09/14/2006 11:23:05 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The president's constitutional war powers were debated and defined in the convention in 1787:
"FRIDAY AUGUST 17th. IN CONVENTION
...Mr. MADISON and Mr. GERRY moved to insert "declare," striking out "make" war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.
Mr. SH[E]RMAN thought it stood very well. The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence war."
The vote was 7 to 1.

Now congress would amend the Constitution by mere law, as the Supreme Court has amended it by mere fiat.

The Founders were wasting their time by debating the president's inherent constitutional power to repel sudden attacks.


15 posted on 09/14/2006 11:26:49 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Is this the one who is in a tight reelection race?


16 posted on 09/14/2006 11:27:11 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Umm. We've already been hit by a terrorist attack. Maybe she slept through 9-11.


17 posted on 09/14/2006 11:30:01 AM PDT by Maceman (This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This stupid RINO defies explanation.


18 posted on 09/14/2006 11:31:50 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Where are all of our "Party over Principle" types on this one...


22 posted on 09/14/2006 11:35:24 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Rep. Heather Wilson, one of eight Republicans, received a 100% rating from CAIR for supporting its interests.

Well, there you go.

24 posted on 09/14/2006 11:43:25 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The moving finger writes and, having writ, moves on......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Congress-critter Heather Wilson sounds like she's trying to edge out Senator Patty Murray as stupidest person to ever serve in Congress.

Can someone lead her away from the floor ~ just take her outside ~ turn her loose.

26 posted on 09/14/2006 11:45:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Republicans are proposing a bill that says we can't initiate surveillance until after we've been struck by a terrorist attack.

I hoe they are just drafting this hoping to get moonbats to vote for it.

27 posted on 09/14/2006 11:46:03 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
It's not only this dimwit broad. Look at her Co-Sponsers?!?

Sensenbrenner????? WTF?!?

btw, I went to Thomas and read HR 5825. However without having the FISA law in front of you, you really can't make heads or tails out of the Bill with all the 'insert 'x', delete 'y' and replace 'z'.

But it definitely has the 'after being attacked' nonsense in it. And in two places.

31 posted on 09/14/2006 11:48:54 AM PDT by Condor51 ("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

I don"t understand, I just don't understand. This is absurd.


35 posted on 09/14/2006 11:57:07 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

So, following these nut-job Republican's logic, after our next attack, we'll have another worthless congressional investigation, aka 9/11 Commission, stacked with many who were/are responsible for our ineptness in defending ourselves, blaming nobody??


37 posted on 09/14/2006 11:59:23 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson