Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where do you stand?
The Political Compass ^

Posted on 09/11/2006 7:45:23 AM PDT by Vanders9

Welcome to The Political Compass™. There's abundant evidence for the need of it. The old one-dimensional categories of 'right' and 'left', established for the seating arrangement of the French National Assembly of 1789, are overly simplistic for today's complex political landscape. For example, who are the 'conservatives' in today's Russia? Are they the unreconstructed Stalinists, or the reformers who have adopted the right-wing views of conservatives like Margaret Thatcher ? On the standard left-right scale, how do you distinguish leftists like Stalin and Gandhi? It's not sufficient to say that Stalin was simply more left than Gandhi. There are fundamental political differences between them that the old categories on their own can't explain. Similarly, we generally describe social reactionaries as 'right-wingers', yet that leaves left-wing reactionaries like Robert Mugabe and Pol Pot off the hook.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: authoritarianism; communism; leftright; liberty; personalblogger; politics; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
These tests are never completely accurate, but they do give very good broad trends! Besides, I think I agree with the general division of social left/right and economic left/right.
1 posted on 09/11/2006 7:45:24 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

Something like this needs to be a permanent fixture on FR with the score posted next to the member name. That way, it will be easier to spot trolls, as well as the neocon/Rockefeller Republican/big gov't/right wing socialists.


2 posted on 09/11/2006 7:51:52 AM PDT by 308MBR (Milkin' and a churnin', pickin' cotton, raising "heck" and balin' hay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

I think this "compass" may be skewed. It's usually lefties who try to get people to take it.


3 posted on 09/11/2006 7:58:35 AM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR

So what was your score? :)


4 posted on 09/11/2006 7:59:02 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
I understand the need for something other than left/right, and I've seen sites similar to this before, but this particular one? Too many of the questions simply couldn't be answered in a way that captured my point of view in any way.

I think if you were building such a thing, you'd want the questions to pass by four people, one each of the extreme of each axis. If they made sense to all four, then go with it.

5 posted on 09/11/2006 8:01:47 AM PDT by prion (Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

Thanks, that was fun.

My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: 2.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.15


6 posted on 09/11/2006 8:04:36 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
I matched up pretty closely with Milton Freidman. He must be a pretty bright guy.
7 posted on 09/11/2006 8:05:10 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Dems - Your conduct is an invitation to the enemy, yet few of you have heart enough to join them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
That way, it will be easier to spot trolls, as well as the neocon/Rockefeller Republican/big gov't/right wing socialists.

Actually, I'd want it to spot all those authoritarian conservatives. You know, the ones that say "we've done nothing wrong so we have nothing to fear from the government." While I have no problem with NSA wiretapping because we have open air waves (in the US, broadcasting something, like your phone conversation, over open air is similar to speaking loudly in public) many otherwise intelligent conservatives have this obsession that runs along the lines of too much legislation, too much control, too much 'law and order' if you will. IOW, nanny-staters. I want to be able to spot them. I guess that would be covered in the big govt part of your statement.
8 posted on 09/11/2006 8:05:20 AM PDT by JamesP81 ("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prion
Too many of the questions simply couldn't be answered in a way that captured my point of view in any way.

That's the problem with many of these. Maybe we should all get together and make our own that's more thoughtfully designed.
9 posted on 09/11/2006 8:06:33 AM PDT by JamesP81 ("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

I despise the way these groups try to place well known people on their scale. These people didn't even answer this set of "loaded" questions. This sure seems like more junk science to me.


10 posted on 09/11/2006 8:08:16 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
Good morning.

So, I'm guessing you were high and to the right on the chart.

Me? I was a little to the right and dead center. Yep, that's me.

Michael Frazier
11 posted on 09/11/2006 8:09:59 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

Scored 0. I disagreed with the premises of the questions and none of the answers correctly described my position.

This is like a "push poll."


12 posted on 09/11/2006 8:11:03 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
Economic Left/Right: 1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.97

One spot to the right and one spot toward Libertarian from the center.

13 posted on 09/11/2006 8:14:18 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Scored 0. I disagreed with the premises of the questions and none of the answers correctly described my position.

This is like a "push poll."

See my initial comment: "These tests are never completely accurate, but they do give very good broad trends! Besides, I think I agree with the general division of social left/right and economic left/right."


None of them correctly described my exact opinions either. People are always more complex than any attempt to categorise folks.

Get a grip. Its just for fun.


14 posted on 09/11/2006 8:18:34 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
Economic Left/Right: 4.38

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.46

15 posted on 09/11/2006 8:28:11 AM PDT by yooling (I don't have anything nice to say...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I matched up pretty closely with Milton Freidman.

Same here.

16 posted on 09/11/2006 8:29:12 AM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
Economic Left/Right: 3.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Sometimes you just have to choose an answer that comes the closest to your opinion ... but it was interesting and entertaining.

17 posted on 09/11/2006 8:31:01 AM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

"This sure seems like more junk science to me.
"

It's not science at all. Reading the questions, from a psychological perspective, they're designed to skew the results.

There's no science in this. It's just another place to play on the internet.


18 posted on 09/11/2006 8:35:04 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prion

"Too many of the questions simply couldn't be answered in a way that captured my point of view in any way."

Any test that shows John F'n Kerry as right wing cannot be taken seriously.

Check the section about 2004 US elections


19 posted on 09/11/2006 8:38:30 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
It's not science at all. Reading the questions, from a psychological perspective, they're designed to skew the results. There's no science in this. It's just another place to play on the internet.

I agree it's not science at all from a psychological perspective or any other kind of perspective. It's nonsense, like all junk science.

20 posted on 09/11/2006 8:40:24 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson