Posted on 09/10/2006 4:42:24 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, September 10th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice ; Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean; Jim Laychak, president of the Pentagon Memorial Fund.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Vice President Dick Cheney.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; New York Gov. George Pataki; Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
THIS WEEK (ABC): 9/11 Commission members Thomas Kean, Richard Ben-Veniste, Jamie Gorelick, John Lehman; Sept. 11 widow and activist Gene Steuerle.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Rice; Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; Said Tayeb Jawad, Afghanistan's ambassador to the U.S.; U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown; Iraq national security adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie; Brian Jenkins, RAND Corp.; John Miller, FBI spokesman.
Aha -- first plan was for New Years Eve! Wow!
They knew Clinton was weak! Dare I say cowardly?
LOL
If you don't, I do! Clintons were/are cowardly
Who posts the Rush threads?
I need to find Friday's but I post to much to search for my one or two posts!
Russert and his polls. What an idiot. That is all he has, DNC talking points. VEEP shoots him down again, and the look on Cheney's face when Fat Dim keeps bringing up the polls is wonderful. VEEP ticks off fact after fact after fact after fact. Russert's response to this list of facts: but....the primary reason for the war was wmd... Based on what you know now, would you still have gone into Iraq. What a dip....hind-sight analysis. Russert reading DNC talking points today, like always.
MNJohnnie usually does
It get worse. Keep watching.
This is the very heart of the matter, yet few "journalists" seem to get it. Well, they get it, they just don't want their audience to.
Hmmmmmm. I think it was another name on Friday.
That's possible
That's not the story I remember. My understanding is he took papers that had notes on them to destroy. In other words, the papers were the same but the ones with notes he destroyed. And, these were the same papers that would have the information on these specific events.
Maybe I'm wrong, and if I am I'm sure a Freeper will correct me, but that's the story I remember.
I thought so too, Rod. If they just kept quiet, some 6 or 7 million would have watched. But now I think some 40 to 45 million would know what it it is even without watching it.
I know who I'll ask in FR mail.
She's not here right now, but she will be soon.
We need to get these out to the squishy middle masses.
The Mediots of the MSM are not even calling this censorship.
Chris Wallace has caved big time over some slight he feels in the past. (prima donna fit)
text synopsis here: http://www.redstate.com/blogs/krempasky/2006/sep/09/abcs_path_to_9_11_clip_synopsis
Perhaps we can email it out to the masses instead of those annoying jokes?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697843/posts
It was angcat
Morning Alas!
Stay away from ABC if you've already eaten breakfast.
I heard them talk about this line up with Steffie here on WMAL in D.C. and knew right then and there to avoid ABC this morning.
"Well (this result) is pretty much as I predicted, except that the other party won. Er, I think this is largely due to the number of votes cast..."
You are probably right
In September of 2001, I slammed into a part of myself I thought disappeared. I thought motherhood had set in; true maturity had finally arrived. The tomboy in me put away the fantasies of being the real life version of Kelly on Charlie’s Angels, and was replaced with visions of Mary Poppins and Claire Huxtable. I was now a mother.
As a mother, I came to know fear and anger like never before. These emotions would crash through me any time I felt my child was threatened in any way. I was fierce in the fervor to protect my children. Nothing; however, could have prepared me for the passion of revenge I tasted on September 11th.
Until this Wednesday, September 1, 2004.
I am a patriot, an extreme believer in Christ (I guess that means people could call me an extremist.), and I love to rally to a good cause (so I guess the word rebel would fit me too.), but what makes someone a terrorist? I am enraged at the attack on children. I am appalled at the slaughter and beheading of innocents. Does this make me want to seek justice? Yes. Does this make me want revenge? Yes. Does it make me want to dress in camouflage, paint my face green, wear bullet necklaces, grab the biggest gun I can find, and hunt down the animals responsible? YES! So, am I a terrorist?
What a fine line. But there is a line. In all the anger, outrage, and pain of the events in the War on Terror, there is still one very distinct ingredient missing. The sting on my heart and the taste of blood in my mouth never lead me to a place or time that I could harm an innocent. I could never randomly pick a father, mother, or child by their mere nationality and hold them hostage, or take a knife to their throat. Let’s drop these “tuxedo” terms (words used to dress-up reality). Go ahead; call me a patriot, because I would surely use deadly force against anyone intruding my homeland to take my freedom from my children. Call me an extremist, because I will serve my God by voting against the slaughter of unborn children and the attack on marriage. Call me a rebel, for I love to call on authority to be accountable. Save the term TERRORIST for those who are so blinded by their arrogance that they are willing to target innocents in order to further their ideology. And just for the record (now pay attention because this is where the extreme patriotic rebel bears her ugly head), terrorist is a tuxedo word too; I’d rather use words like, MONSTERS, ANIMALS, MURDEROUS THUGS, or MOVING TARGETS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.