You are incorrect.
No, evolution and faith coexist nicely.
Some smart Catholics on this very forum, have explained to me, that science can never capture the essence of God, and his plan, and his doings, no matter what science might find. The mystery is eternal, as is the mystery of what lifts the spirit. (I might have that wrong; that is this pagan's take on it.) Food for thought for this near atheist. What resonates for me in particular, is that one should be more aware of what one does not know, as opposed to making erroneous tacit assumptions about what one knows. Most of us think we know more than we really do. That is in our genes. It may be a good survival mechanism, but it may not be the road to truth.
Philosophy and theology can and should be separated. So thought Aquinas and he was as theological as they come.
Hmm... lets run that through other branches of science:
There is no other interpretation of physics except "anti-theistic".
There is no other interpretation of astronomy except "anti-theistic".
There is no other interpretation of chemistry except "anti-theistic".
Nope, it doesn't fit any of them. You are quite wrong.
Glad I didn't say that.
Presuming to know the mind and methods of God is a symptom of at least one of the Seven Deadly Sins.
Spread all over the internet for everyone (including God) to see.
Why?
I disagree. Most of what passes for evolution today is colored by the anti-theistic attitudes of Darwin's supporters. I don't have any problem with the idea of God creating the building blocks of life and putting it on its course, since He would be the One to define what each stage of the Creation would be. Just because it doesn't conform to the Six Day Creation idea, doesn't make it any less possible. After all, who are we to say how long God's days were during this time of Creation? Man was created last, and wasn't around to write down the events as they happened anyway.