JAY [Rockefeller] SAYS America safer WITH SADDAM in power

cbs evening news ^

[JerseyDvl]

Why hasn't this fool been charged with leaking classified information yet?

[sanjacjake]

The Rock in his name stands for the ones in his
head..another nitwit that knows it all...How the hell
can anyone say such bull...no body knows...but one
thing is sure..they know we are after them...and that
would never happen under the Democrats..they know that
POTUS won't back down...regardless of the media drumroll
to have him do it...that's why the Dems are screwed..and
the Senate will have Liebermann in it..as an Independent
and he can stick ti to his hypocrits..LOL..Jake

[NewLand]

JAY SAYS America safer WITH SADDAM in power

NewLand says America safer, smarter, and less polluted without Jay Rockefeller.

[CommieCutter]

So what of their denouncing of Saddam in 1998 now?? This is pathetic and the American people have to see this...I hope.

[BusterBear]

What a f**n SOB. Saddam was paying all sorts of bribes to France, Russia, and China to get the sanctions lifted, so that he could proceed with his WMD and nuclear programs. The bribes he paid to politicians worldwide via Oil for Food were the most extensive fraud in history. I guess Jay is all right with that.

[hipaatwo]

Story and link:

Sen.: Iraq Would Be Better With Saddam
Sept. 9, 2006(CBS) When the Senate Intelligence Committee released a declassified version of its findings this past week, the Republican chairman of the committee, Pat Roberts, left town without doing interviews, calling the report a rehash of unfounded partisan allegations.

Its statements like this one, made Feb. 5, 2003, by then-Secretary of State Colin Powell that have become so controversial, implying Iraq was linked to terror attacks.

"Iraq today harbors a deadly terrorist network headed by abu Musab al-Zarqawi, an associated collaborator of Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda lieutenants," Powell said.

But after 2 1/2 years of reviewing pre-war intelligence behind closed doors, the lead Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, Sen. John Rockefeller (D-W.V.), who voted for the Iraq War, says the Bush administration pulled the wool over everyone's eyes.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/09/eveningnews/printable1990644.shtml

[hipaatwo]

Look our favorite Sen. opened his yap

[mainepatsfan]

I do pray this becomes a Democratic talking point.

[billhilly]

The Rockefellers have always been internationalists, and power means more to them than anything, even power by dictators who serve their interests.

Fortunately, Jay Rockefeller has never had the clout of Nelson, or David.

[KosmicKitty]

And the Rockerfellas are smart and we should belive what they say because!!!

(Uncle or daddy died screwing secretaty??)

[mass55th]

I hope I live long enough to see every one of these two-faced, dim-witted, traitorous nin-com-poops eat their lying words.

[Charles Henrickson]

THOSE WERE UDAY'S
Tune: "Those Were the Days"

Boy, the pranks Qusay would play!
Loved to gas the Kurds away.
But those rapes that wedding day--
Those were Uday's.

And you didn't dare complain
Or you'd gain a world of pain.
Mister, we could use a reign
Like that of Saddam Hussein.

Didn't need no polls to tell
Who would rule this living hell.
Gee, our old Iraq ran swell--
Those were the days!

[Phsstpok]

CNN is also started to beat this drum. Saddam wasn't a threat. Saddam wasn't even our enemy, at least not until Bush invaded. Never mind 10 years of "death to America," assassination plots, $25,000 per head for suicide bombers (those are just jooooos).

This is truly disgusting.

[mainepatsfan]

By they're logic we should never have destroyed the Third Reich because they were a counter balance against the Soviet Union.

[mainepatsfan]

Rather THEIR logic

[wagglebee]

Let's not forget that this is the guy whose grandfather made the deal with the Wahhabist Saud family that made them among the wealthiest families on earth and enabled them to bankroll jihadists throughout the world.

[digger48]

Statement of Senator John D. Rockefeller IV on the Senate Floor On the Iraq Resolution October 10, 2002

There has been some debate over how "imminent" a threat Iraq poses. I do believe that Iraq poses an imminent threat,, but I also believe that after September 11, that question is increasingly outdated. It is in the nature of these weapons, and the way they are targeted against civilian populations, that documented capability and demonstrated intent may be the only warning we get. To insist on further evidence could put some of our fellow Americans at risk. Can we afford to take that chance? We cannot!

[Phsstpok]

By they're logic we should never have destroyed the Third Reich because they were a counter balance against the Soviet Union.

Joe Kennedy and a lot of prewar Democrats made precisely this argument.

They were then replaced by Democrats who argued we shouldn't oppose anything Joe Stalin wanted to do because he was a counter balance against fascism.

Democrats.  The reliable traitors. 

[mainepatsfan]

They value order over liberty.

[goldstategop]

That was one of the DUMBEST, most revolting statements I've heard in my entire life! Saddam Hussein was a sworn ENEMY of the United States, whose fingerprints are on the FIRST World Trade Center bombing and who ordered the assassination of the first President Bush! This is the guy who invaded Kuwait and forced us to occupy Saudi Arabia for 12 years to keep him contained. Saddam committed genocide against his own people and pursued weapons of mass destruction. To say we would have been safer with him in power is unbelievable and for Jay Rockefeller to say that and repudiate his vote FOR the war shows the Democrats are descending to the final phase of madness. They cannot be trusted with our national security.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )