ABC changes 9/11 show under pressure [The Clinton Cover Up Continues]

WorldNet Daily ^ | Sept. 7, 2006 | Not Cited

[yoe]

ABC News
47 W. 66th St. New York, NY 10023
http://www.abc.com

If this company wants to alter history to assuage Bill Clinton, they are truly no longer trust worthy. Bill Clinton's eight years in office appeased the terrorists - there is no denying it.

[TomGuy]

ABC changes 9/11 show under pressure

There is another loud, clear, ominous message in that headline:

If you think the Clintons are not powerful, watch what is happening. Remember that when you poo-poo the idea that Hillary Clinton will never be President. They have, quite possibly, the most powerful political machine ever. This skirmish is only a dusting of the war that will occur if any politician gets between Hillary and the WH in 08.

[stockstrader]

I agree. Maybe now there will be some that actually ADDRESS the gross negligence and reckless disregard that the Clinton administration displayed on military and national security matters.

Up until now, Slick has been given a virtually FREE PASS!!!

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Good question. Too bad inquiring reporters don't seem to want to know.

[Eagles Talon IV]

My understanding is that no one who has the clearance and views secret documents from the archives actually gets the original. They will only get copies.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

If we can keep it alive.

[Dave S]

What scenes that the Dems have demanded be removed is there any evidence for that they ever occured? This is not about whether Clinton was distracted by the whole Lewinsky thing but the House of Representatives shares responsibility for that. This whole episode is beginning to sound like the Reagan movie a few years back.

[stockstrader]

Good point Suzy.

That's one thing that really bothers me about the Patriot Act. Although I trust the current administration with expanded govt powers, I do NOT share that same feeling when the faces change with some future democratic administration.

[Dave S]

Bill Clinton's eight years in office appeased the terrorists - there is no denying it.

True but should ABC fabricate history to communicate that. Isnt the truth powerful enough?

[Lou L]

So all in all, I'd say it's a win for our side, no matter what ABC does.

If they can intimidate ABC to remove undesirable scenes in this show, they can intimidate another publication or media outlet to show or tell any story they want.

My only question is, will any future historian be able to uncover the facts, or will all the damning evidence be destroyed by then? Will accounts of this event be backed by unquestionable proof, or will all we have are vague recollections and anecdotes? (For those that didn't react strongly to the story when it was reported, this is exactly why the story about Sandy Berger destroying files was so important.)

[Mo1]

Reports say that scene showed Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, declining to give the order to kill bin Laden

Ya know .. I can't help but think there is more to this hoopla then just Sandy Burger

[ex-Texan]

"Our docudrama was too long, anyway.," says ABC. "We only cut by an hour. Now it's just four hours long instead of five. Better for the viewing public that way. Now they can go to sleep earlier."

No big deal. Nothing to see here. Lock your doors and windows. Time to move on.

[Maceman]

If they can intimidate ABC to remove undesirable scenes in this show, they can intimidate another publication or media outlet to show or tell any story they want.

True. But the major media outlets know they have to answer to the conservative blogosphere, and they are not going to want to suffer to many more black eyes like Dan Rather and the Reuters debacle.

[Logical me]

It's hard for me to believe that ABC, the Clintoon's network, would edit anything out that would hurt their lover boy. Maybe the editing was planned and all this crap is to peek interest so to get the border line conservatives Conservatives and the independents to watch. You know, I don't trust RATS and all their Hollywood jackasses they have in their pockets. ABC?????????? When the heck did they come over to the right side?

[End_Clintonism_Now]

[KC_Conspirator]

They do those things, so they assume everybody else does it too.

That is exactly right.

[johnny7]

“We were raped in broad daylight by horrible people and they are arrogantly rubbing it in our faces.”

How ironic. It is alleged that when Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick in her hotel room... he went back for... seconds.

[FreedomNeocon]

Wonder why the MSM is not asking?

Because weenies like McStain and Bush's "friends" in the Justice Department thought a suspension of security clearance until Bush leaves office and a small fine was proper punishment.

Meanwhile, what happened to Tom Delay and for what? What happened to Rove and Libby and for what?

With friends like these...

[Verginius Rufus]

There was also Clinton's bombing of Iraq in December 1998 in an effort to prevent the House of Representatives from voting on the articles of impeachment.