Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Following complaints, ABC tweaks its 9/11 mini-series
Chicago Tribune ^

Posted on 09/07/2006 11:21:19 AM PDT by Sir Gawain

ABC toned down a scene that involved Clinton's national security adviser, Samuel "Sandy" Berger, declining to give the order to kill bin Laden, according to a person involved with the film who declined to be identified. "That sequence has been the focus of attention," the source said.

The network also decided that the credits would say the film is based "in part" on the 9/11 panel report, rather than "based on" the report, as the producers originally intended.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: abcaljazeera; abcisvestia; abcnytimes; abcpravda; abctass; abctv; appeasement; benedictarnold; bj; bjclinton; bluedressstains; boycottbait; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; demorats; dhimmicrats; fifthanniversary; iwantolive; kneepadsrus; mediajihad; mediamorons; mediawhores; monica; neglect; negligence; ovalofficestains; pathto911; whileclintonslept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 401-406 next last
To: Sir Gawain

Maybe they will sell the "uncut" version via DVD like a lot of movies do but I am not holding my breath.


221 posted on 09/07/2006 3:25:53 PM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Am I the only one who believes this stuff shouldn't be "dramatized" and that it isn't suitable for conversion into an entertainment product?


222 posted on 09/07/2006 3:26:33 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

According to the segment on Brit's show a few minutes ago, Reed is saying he wants the film pulled and from the sounds of his comments it sounded like a threat to me.


223 posted on 09/07/2006 3:28:20 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: mware

The grape vine is also going to discuss the 911 film and the dems.


224 posted on 09/07/2006 3:29:40 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Path to 9/11

Yet another kick in the ass for the general public. It's them whom you are crucifying by sacrificing the truth.

We will make an extensive effort to define news media once again by this decision.

Sincerely,
xxxxxx


225 posted on 09/07/2006 3:29:57 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mware

I say pull the show and air a tasteful documentary or tribute.


226 posted on 09/07/2006 3:30:26 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

227 posted on 09/07/2006 3:31:01 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

The director probably realized that had he aired the program against the Clinton's wishes, he would have found himself fishing in a lake in the middle of the night and never returning.


228 posted on 09/07/2006 3:31:11 PM PDT by mike182d ("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

I just knew they'd fold like a cheap tent.


229 posted on 09/07/2006 3:31:34 PM PDT by Bullish ( The pig headed monkeys of Islam can kiss my grits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Next, they'll cave and show the terrorists as White Supremacists.


230 posted on 09/07/2006 3:32:14 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: paudio
This sort of thing that I expected they would do. It may be good if we tell ABC that people want to see the movie, so they won't have second thought. Please contact them:

http://abc.go.com/site/contactus.html

IMHO, we don't need to say anything about Clintonistas, etc., a simple message that we want to watch the movie I think will be fine.

Agree. I sent ABC such an e-mail, and they immediately replied with this (before I received an "offcial" reply:

"Note: The Company's long-established policy does not allow us to accept for review or consideration any ideas, suggestions, or creative materials not solicited by us or our subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event that you have submitted such content, please be advised that the submission has been forwarded to the Company's legal department for handling."

231 posted on 09/07/2006 3:32:32 PM PDT by CDB ("They shall fall by the sword: they shall be a portion for foxes." from Psalm 63)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Ohh....Brit just outted a 'plot' on DU. Called a 'Google Bomb'. Everyone is to post identical entries to a blog (DU?) with the title of the movie 'Path to 9/11'. Then when someone googles it they will get tons of hits to DU where the 'truth will be told about the movie.'


232 posted on 09/07/2006 3:34:16 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: paudio

I will not watch the now redacted version, and I was looking forward to it before the network caved to the pantywaists and cowardly 'nistas. Screw ABC.


233 posted on 09/07/2006 3:34:20 PM PDT by thelastvirgil (Incumbent politicians: PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
Brits nailed the DU'ers!!!!!!

LOL, he mentioned that the blogs (DU'ers) are going to do a google bomb on the review of the film. They are going to send identical reviews of the film while and after it is shown.

234 posted on 09/07/2006 3:34:27 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Berger says the account was not in the Commission Report. Gee I wonder why? Perhaps it had something to do with him stealing and destroying the documents related to these incidents.

Once again the goodie-two-shoes Bushes prove that mercy--in this case not throwing Berger in jail for his treason--is pure stupidity in politics. I despise the Clintons, but at least they play dirty and to win. The Bushes seem to play only to be LIKED. Had they thrown Sandy Berger in jail, his protestations now would merely be the sour grapes of a disgraced felon, and be ignored by one and all in the public square. And let's face it, if a member of FDR's cabinet had been proven to have stolen or destroyed Archives documents relating to Pearl Harbor--he would have been hung by the neck until dead.

235 posted on 09/07/2006 3:37:19 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

Thanks Brit..... That is just what I was saying earlier in this post... duers and moveon are out in full force sending out their bogus mass emails to ABC.

Don't they know most of those posts are from hippie long hair dope smokers, or 15 year old computer geeks, or 65 year old stuck in the 60's professors.


236 posted on 09/07/2006 3:38:53 PM PDT by JFC (Land of the FREE because of our BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Can you imagine the response of ABC if the Bush administration had asked for edits of this film? The original should be releaed on DVD.


237 posted on 09/07/2006 3:38:58 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
I heard Jed Babbin talk about this yesterday and he said that even with this scene edited you cannot come away from this movie not seeing how little Clinton did

It's not over yet. Do you think the Clintonistas will be satisfied with this? Or the Kossacks? I still give odds of 55/45 this thing will be pulled entirely before Sunday.

238 posted on 09/07/2006 3:39:04 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Anti-freedom Democrat Crime Syndicate Method of Operation BUMP!
239 posted on 09/07/2006 3:39:07 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Clinton gave the orders.....and the employees at ABC want to stay alive.


240 posted on 09/07/2006 3:39:11 PM PDT by Fawn (http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 401-406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson