Skip to comments.
Iraq hangs 27 'terrorists'
AFP ^
| September 6 2006
Posted on 09/06/2006 1:19:38 PM PDT by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 last
To: cripplecreek
101
posted on
09/06/2006 5:29:52 PM PDT
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: jmc1969
The US Supreme Court has ruled this unconstitutional in a 5-4 vote.
To: weegee
If the Iraqis apprehend any of the Western journalists who are meeting with terrorists, would anyone have a problem if the Iraqi government sentenced them to death as enemies of the state?No. Their state, their enemies. They can do what they will.
To: jmc1969
104
posted on
09/06/2006 7:30:33 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
105
posted on
09/06/2006 9:53:14 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: AxelPaulsenJr
Pakistan is a nuclear power which will be Mullahed out soon enough. That's his turf now but that's where he will be caught in a covert game.
To: weegee
107
posted on
09/06/2006 10:00:36 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES.)
To: weegee
"If the Iraqis apprehend any of the Western journalists who are meeting with terrorists, would anyone have a problem if the Iraqi government sentenced them to death as enemies of the state?"
None whatsoever
108
posted on
09/07/2006 6:16:54 AM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(In a world where Carpenters come back from the dead, ALL things are possible.)
To: Dog Gone
Well, the thread is talking about Iraq hanging a number of terrorists, that's how I led to my comment that the top terrorist was still alive. I guess I should have specified the top Iraqi terrorist.
109
posted on
09/07/2006 6:53:07 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.)
To: weegee
CNN has admitted they knew of abuse, torture, and murder under Saddam but they kept quiet in order to maintain their Baghdada bureau. After Saddam's trial, could they also be found to be knowing accomplices?
I sure hope so. They sacrificed innocent lives for "journalism". The blood is partly on their hands for keeping it quiet. Their bureau in Baghdad only served as a propoganda tool for Saddam anyway.
110
posted on
09/07/2006 10:38:35 AM PDT
by
Rameumptom
(Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
To: Rameumptom
Exactly; those who shout "No blood for oil" should be aware of "blood for ratings".
111
posted on
09/07/2006 10:45:12 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: weegee
If the Iraqis apprehend any of the Western journalists who are meeting with terrorists, would anyone have a problem if the Iraqi government sentenced them to death as enemies of the state?Only if they waste time and money on a trial...
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
112
posted on
09/07/2006 12:18:45 PM PDT
by
Criminal Number 18F
(In which article of the Constitution is the Press assigned a role in government? Precisely.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson