FRmail me if you want on or off the Thomas Sowell Ping List.
Posted on 09/06/2006 1:03:52 PM PDT by Gordongekko909
One of the bitter ironies of the 20th century was that communism, which began as an egalitarian doctrine accusing capitalism of selfishness and calloused sacrifices of others, became in power a system whose selfishness and callousness toward others made the sins of capitalism pale.
The ruling elites of the Soviet Union, called the "nomenklatura," had their own separate and superior stores where ordinary citizens were not allowed to shop, their own separate and superior medical facilities, as well as their own separate and superior living quarters, all off-limits to the masses.
Everyone in communist societies addressed one another with the egalitarian term "comrade." But some comrades had the arbitrary power of life and death over other comrades.
Soviet communism is now history but people who talk equality and practice elitism, who wrap their own selfishness in the mantle of idealism, and who sacrifice others on the altar to their own vision without a moment's hesitation are not only still with us but have become the norm on the left.
They don't have nearly the power that the Soviet dictatorship had. But they use whatever power they do have in the same spirit. The green ideology of today, like the red ideology of the past, takes it for granted that other people do not have the same rights as the new nomenklatura.
Where the new nomenklatura enjoy a particular lifestyle in a particular community, then the power of government is used to preserve that lifestyle and freeze that community where it is, even if that means freezing out other people who may not have the same money or the same lifestyle preferences.
Monterey County, California, is a classic example, though by no means unique. A recent story in the Wall Street Journal quoted residents of that coastal community as saying how much they liked its lifestyle and ambiance -- as a justification of laws that make it nearly impossible for anyone with less money to live there.
First of all, laws forbid building anything on three-quarters of the land in that county. Existing residents who support such laws don't own that land but they can politically keep others from living on it, which is the whole point of much rhapsodizing about "preserving" this and "saving" that.
Land prices skyrocket when the supply of land is artificially and drastically reduced, which means that housing prices become astronomical. The consequences for those on the outside looking in were illustrated by the story of a farm worker in Monterey County whose family had been living in a room for years but who now could finally afford to buy a small house.
This farm worker was described as "thrilled" to the point of tears as he bought a 1,013-square-foot home for $490,000, even though it would take 70 percent of his income to make the mortgage payments. He planned to rent out one of the rooms to try to make ends meet.
His situation was not as unusual as it would be in most other places. The average share of income required for someone with the average income in Monterey County to buy the average home there is 60 percent.
But of course this does not apply to the existing residents who bought or inherited their homes in years past. Far from suffering economically from the laws they pass, they see the market values of their own homes go up by leaps and bounds.
One of these residents describes herself as a liberal Democrat and an ardent environmentalist. Election results in this and other affluent counties in coastal California suggest that she is very much the norm among the new nomenklatura.
The green nomenklatura talk egalitarianism like the old red nomenklatura and similarly ride roughshod over others while doing it. Their economic ethnic cleansing has driven tens of thousands of blacks out of some liberal Democratic counties.
There were 79,000 blacks living in San Francisco in 1990 and 46,000 today. So many people with children are leaving these bastions of liberal Democratic environmentalists as to force many schools in these counties to close.
But the new nomenklatura go around feeling good about themselves while leaving havoc in their wake.
FRmail me if you want on or off the Thomas Sowell Ping List.
$490,000 for 1,013 sq ft? I would cry too.
Thomas Sowell is right.
That would buy a palace here in the Charlotte suburbs, with plenty left over to hire the farm worker and his family to do the housework and the lawn!
Good to see that he's groping at the truth. Behavioral communism {"rules are for thee, but not for me - I'm from the master race", which he describes on nomenklatura example) is the same across all places and times since the Stone Age. And it does not distinguish between ideological flavors - any one would do, although nowadays it needs some ideological framework, so he got that one right, too.
Sowell: genius at work!
A minor point: after Stalin, the Soviet Union was an oligarchy, not a dictatorship. Probably lived about the same, though.
I was watching Peter Beinart present his liberal foerign policy. In every instance that he discussed his policy left millions oppressed. That's Ok with liberals, I guess.
He knows that his article is done not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Oops, I thought he was talking about Northern Virginia. O.k., well 1500 sq. ft (455 of which is unfinished basement) is only $450K.
Is he referring to all of Monterey County, which is rather large and mostly rural, or just to the communities along the coast? I would imagine that rents in Greenfield, King City, Parkfield, or San Lucas would be rather low.
I grew up in Santa Cruz county on the North side of Monterey Bay. Limosine liberalism is rampant there. Most of the environmental policies there are designed to prevent any new development and "preserve" these communities for those that already live there. When I left 20 years ago a run-down studio apartment was running 6-800 per month. My mother's mobile home sold for $125,000 in 1991. Only the very rich can afford to live there anymore and they do everything to keep it that way.
Da comrade! Once socialized medicine becomes reality, don't even dream of seeing your local congresscritter or Hillary standing in line at the local people's clinic. Come to think of it, don't these parasites currently have walk in privileges to Walter Reed Hospital?
A "farm worker" can afford a 1/2 MILLION $ house? Must be nice to be so poor.
Let's see social security + disability .... nah - I can't even pay the taxes with 100% of my money!
Cry me a river, Kalifornia.
BTW - I am not complaining - I own free and clear one 2,000 sqft home on 3/4 acre and one "investment" home that will be paid for in 10 years.
I am not starving, nor am I choosing medicine over food or vice-versa. This is a great country - it is only populated by many fools.
Da comrade! Once socialized medicine becomes reality, don't even dream of seeing your local congresscritter or Hillary standing in line at the local people's clinic. Come to think of it, don't these parasites currently have walk in privileges to Walter Reed Hospital?
Sowell hit it right on the head. Now if only Hannity & Company will call the RATS what they really are.
When I first started reading, I thought he was going to talk about "environmentalists" who travel in private jets, helicopters, yachts, and motorcades, while telling the rest of us that we have to conserve, to fight global warming.
Oh well, Dr. Sowell is always worth reading, no matter what his subject.
That, and he likes to look at local stuff every once in a while, too. Everyone talks about big-scale stuff, but enviro-wackos are just as dangerous at the local level, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.