Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats on a roll in battle for U.S. Congress
Reuters ^ | Sept. 3, 2006 | John Whitesides

Posted on 09/03/2006 8:27:24 AM PDT by FairOpinion

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats enter the fall campaign with a clear edge in the high-stakes fight for control of the U.S. Congress, riding a wave of momentum that has them positioned to retake the U.S. House of Representatives and make significant gains in the Senate.

President George W. Bush's low approval ratings and public dissatisfaction with the Iraq war, gas prices and the country's direction threaten Republican leadership in Congress and put Democrats within reach of victory on November 7, analysts said.

"I don't think the question any longer is can Democrats win control of Congress, it's can Republicans do anything to stop it?" said Amy Walter, House analyst for the nonpartisan Cook Political Report newsletter. "All the factors and issues are pushing so strongly against Republicans."

All 435 House seats, 34 of 100 Senate seats and 36 governorships are at stake in November's election, with Democrats needing to pick up 15 House seats and six Senate seats to reclaim majorities.

Strategists in both parties say the glum public mood has created a strong desire for change and given Democrats a big advantage at the traditional opening of the campaign season on Monday's Labor Day holiday.

"It's too late to fix the national mood -- it's not going to be fixed," said Republican pollster Frank Luntz. "The major issues are not playing well for Republicans this year, and Republicans are not playing well with America this year."

History is also with Democrats -- the party holding the White House traditionally loses seats in a president's sixth year. The modern exception was 1998, when public unhappiness over the Republican-led impeachment of President Bill Clinton helped Democrats gain five House seats.

"This looks like a classic sixth-year election," said University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato, who called the president's low approval ratings, hovering at about 40 percent, "the single best indicator for any mid-term election."

A Democratic majority in even one chamber of Congress would slam the brakes on what is left of Bush's second-term legislative agenda and hasten his descent into lame-duck status in the final two years of his presidency.

It also would give Democrats an opportunity to hold hearings and investigate many of the administration's more controversial foreign, military and energy policy decisions.

Candidates around the country will spend Monday's Labor Day holiday marching in parades, shaking hands at fairs and laying the groundwork for the final two-month push to the November 7 election.

KEY BATTLEGROUNDS

About 40 House districts and a dozen Senate seats will be the key battlegrounds, and they will be flooded in the next two months with campaign cash and appearances by party big shots.

Democrats are in the strongest position in the House, analysts said, where nearly every endangered incumbent is Republican. Independent analyst Stuart Rothenberg projects a Democratic gain of 15-20 seats, while the Cook Report lists 17 House seats as toss-ups -- all Republican.

But Republican House campaign spokesman Carl Forti shrugged off predictions of a takeover.

"We're nowhere near as bad off as the experts would have you believe," he said, adding Bush's low ratings and public dissatisfaction with the Republican-led Congress would not determine House races.

In the Senate, Democrats are expected to pick up seats. But to win control they will need to bump off at least five Republican incumbents -- difficult but not impossible even under favorable conditions.

In recent polls, Democratic challengers led Republican incumbents Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania, Conrad Burns in Montana and Mike DeWine in Ohio. Jim Talent in Missouri, Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island and George Allen in Virginia also face re-election struggles.

The open Tennessee seat of retiring Republican Senate Leader Bill Frist is also on the endangered list for Republicans.

Democratic incumbents Maria Cantwell in Washington, Debbie Stabenow in Michigan and Bob Menendez in New Jersey face potentially tough races, and Democrats must defend open seats in Minnesota and Maryland.

Many voters do not start paying attention until late in the campaign and many candidates only start spending heavily in September, giving the races plenty of chances to shift before the election.

Unexpected events, like the capture of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden or a major terrorist strike, could quickly shift the political landscape.

"I'm a political realist. Can we win? Yes, but this is 10 weeks out and a lot can happen in 10 weeks," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; alreuters; congress; congresselections; democrats; election2006; elections; midterms; ohplease; reuterslies; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last
To: tobyhill

And you base all this on....what, exactly?


61 posted on 09/03/2006 9:53:43 AM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
".....(i.e. technical analysis), one would have to give the Dems a huge advantage."

Explain this "technical analysis, if you would. Do you have credible polling for the local races? If so show us. All I have ever seen is the generic polling. This always seems to give the left an advantage until a real name is inserted in place of just a Party affiliation. When that happens the incumbent seems to win, and rather easily.

So exactly what races are you talking about and let's see some referenced analysis. Thanks

62 posted on 09/03/2006 9:53:53 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"Sorry, but based on what?

Based on the strongest instinct of mankind. The desire to stay alive. The problem with some people is they claim the media lies and distorts and yet use the media own flawed polling to become hysterical because they claim Rep will get decimated in the coming elections.

63 posted on 09/03/2006 9:57:27 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
" Why would Americans vote for those who hate America? "

Because the numbskull nimwit clueless have been " SHEEPLED ".
64 posted on 09/03/2006 9:57:32 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

How about Bush's tax cuts, which turned the economy around? We have a good economy, the MSM just doesn't want to tell people.

Also, Bush tried to get a social security reform enacted, but the Dems obstructed it.

If we have nuclear plants, and drilled in ANWR and off shore, gas would be cheaper because we wouldn't have to depend on foreign oil -- all these have been and continue to be obstructed by the Dems.

And as for terrorism -- that is still the top issue, or should be -- if we get nuked, none of the other things will matter.


65 posted on 09/03/2006 9:59:10 AM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
All I have ever seen is the generic polling. This always seems to give the left an advantage until a real name is inserted in place of just a Party affiliation. When that happens the incumbent seems to win, and rather easily.

Polls of likely voters or polls of "adults" or even registered voters in a mid-term year? It is especially important in mid-term years to focus only on likely voter polls. Only approximately a third of registered voters tend to vote on off-year elections. And this is the GOP's secret weapon. Their GOTV operation is far ahead of anything the Rats have.

66 posted on 09/03/2006 9:59:31 AM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer


We can't be complacent. We certainly shouldn't allow ourselves to be demoralized by the MSM articles, just the opposite, it should stir us to action, get out the vote and vote Republican.


More GOP Districts Counted as Vulnerable. Number Doubled Over the Summer

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1694856/posts


67 posted on 09/03/2006 10:04:12 AM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Do you have credible polling for the local races?

There is some local (i.e. non-generic) polling done by an outfit called Strategic Vision. Their customers are usually local media (like local TV stations or newspapers). Their website is http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/results.htm

The difficult thing about mid-terms is turnout. That is why generic polling is useless. But local polling is showing similar results, i.e. endangered Republicans running begind, while so-called endangered Democrats (like Maria Cantwell) consistently ahead, albeit by a few points.

In addition, the website pollingreport.com publishes state polls commissioned by local media. Wesbite is http://www.pollingreport.com/2006.htm

Note: State poll results only to subscribers

The other thing is trends published and tracked by Rasmussen. They are showing a steady decline in Republican identification over the past 12-16 months. This is a "macro-indicator" of election results, albeit a weak one. Taken together, all of these point to the same thing, i.e. Republicans in danger.

The technical analysis I was talking about is similar to stock analysis, where you ignore fundamentals, and concentrate on mathematical and statistical trends. Even if you were to adopt this rather controversial technique, simple statistics tells me that if all 40 toss up races have Republican incumbents, it does not bode well for us.

68 posted on 09/03/2006 10:15:04 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
And I forgot this one:

http://www.surveyusa.com/electionpolls.aspx

69 posted on 09/03/2006 10:24:58 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Based on the previous price of gas compared to President Bush's approval rating and my belief that Iraq will play a smaller role in the mid-terms than some believe. People are ticked off about the gas prices and while some know what the true problem is, supply and demand and obstructionist Rats, they are not going to let the Republicans off the hook for the prices that easy. These numbers are not going to be changeable after the beginning of October because people's minds will have already been made up and any lowering will look as though it's a political stunt. There's many other factors that I thought about but I must go to Walmart now in order to PO the unions.
70 posted on 09/03/2006 10:28:23 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
In "libspeak", in trouble means that he is leading his Democratic opponent by less then 15 points.

I can believe that. Maybe they'll all win with 55%, and the Dems will say, "See, see, we did it! We held them to a razor tight ten point victory! More people agree with us!"

Actually, given their reaction to Paul Hackett's "moral victory," I think they'll do just that.
71 posted on 09/03/2006 10:29:19 AM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

By the way, I am not trying to bolster Reuters or other MSM. I am warning against dangerous complacency. In the face of the most negative GOP sentiment in 12 years, some people here are talking about large gains in the House for us, and I think this is naive, wishful thinking. I despise the Democrats and especially the Congressional Black Caucus, and I would be delighted if the pollyannas were correct, but let us not be complacent.


72 posted on 09/03/2006 10:33:58 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

So says John Whitesides from Al Reuters.

I think I'll wait for the real election.


73 posted on 09/03/2006 10:38:39 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
..Ronald Reagan...

Nice misdirection try.

Try defending Bush's amnesty and third-world migration schemes on their own merits.

and sorry if I don't believe, as you appear to, that merging our homeland with Mexico and then tripling third-world migration, including mulsim immigration, is a great idea.

74 posted on 09/03/2006 10:39:33 AM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Democrat's Migration Explosion Act of 2006. No to 70 million new third-world aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Momentum is on the Republican side, yet again. Iowa Electronic Market:

Congress06 2006 US Congressional Control Market


Assets: Name Description
RH_RS06 $1 if Republican House, Republican Senate in 2006 election
RH_NS06 $1 if Republican House, Non-Republican Senate in 2006 election
NH_RS06 $1 if Non-Republican House, Republican Senate in 2006 election
NH_NS06 $1 if Non-Republican House, Non-Republican Senate in 2006 election


75 posted on 09/03/2006 10:41:00 AM PDT by Porterville (Hispanic Republican American Bush Supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Hasn't Al Reuters printed this article for the past 10 elections?? We will pick up a couple in both houses.

Pray for W and Our Troops


76 posted on 09/03/2006 10:42:55 AM PDT by bray (Koffi 4 Food has Failed.......Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RodgerD
Try defending Bush's amnesty and third-world migration schemes on their own merits.

I thought all you types go in hiding before elections... you still out screaming nonsense? " "Amnesty!!!, Jorge Bush!!!, Jalapeno in every Bush!! Illegal!!! All Hispanics are are illegal!!!! The Rio Grande!!! John Wayne!!! The Alamo!!!" Does that sum up your talking points? I mean grow up.

77 posted on 09/03/2006 10:44:25 AM PDT by Porterville (Hispanic Republican American Bush Supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Thanks for the info on the polling but even though I asked for it I have little if any faith in polling because they are so often so wrong and can be so easily manipulated. Even Rasmussen, while showing a decline in those who call themselves Republicans shows only a small increase in those that call themselves Democrats. I attribute this to the bandwagon effect where weak minded folks change affiliation based on the perception of who is doing better. They want to be associated with a winner.

I am sure this will change when the Republican begin their push, which has yet to happen. The same folks who switched, will again switch back and I still maintain the over riding thought in the minds of voters will be national security.

78 posted on 09/03/2006 10:45:31 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

They did the same in the CA D51 race. The Rep won but the libs claimed "victory" because it was a close race in a heavily Rep district.


79 posted on 09/03/2006 10:47:37 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
WASHINGTON WHISPERS: GOP VOTERS - LIKE A ROCK
80 posted on 09/03/2006 10:48:21 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson