Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 3 September 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 3 September 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 09/03/2006 5:01:28 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, September 3rd, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa.; Washington Redskins coach Joe Gibbs.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., and his Democratic challenger, state treasurer Robert Casey.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean; Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.; Sen. Lincoln Chafee, R-R.I., and his primary challenger, Cranston Mayor Stephen Laffey; actress and animal rights activist Bo Derek.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn.; Iraqi deputy prime minister Barham Salih; Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iranian representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency; Teamsters president James Hoffa and Labor Secretary Elaine Chao; former Clinton adviser Lanny Davis and former Bush campaign strategist Matthew Dowd.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; biden; boderek; casey; chafee; dol; elainechao; elizabethdole; facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; hoffa; iaea; iran; iraq; joegibbs; labor; laborday; laffey; lannydavis; lateedition; lineup; matthewdowd; mcconnell; meetthepress; salih; santorum; schumer; shays; soltanieh; specter; sunday; talkshows; thisweek; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 861-866 next last
To: Roccus
I sincerely hate to agree with you but you make a lot of really good points.

Until we see all those "moderate mooslims" in the streets demanding that their brothers stop trying to kill all of us infidels I don't trust them at all.

581 posted on 09/03/2006 10:56:09 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Regarding the manifestations of the undermining, why wouldn't the cited example count?

I'm sorry, but what cited manifestations are you referring to?

582 posted on 09/03/2006 10:57:00 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Most informative, Mo1. Thank you.


583 posted on 09/03/2006 10:58:35 AM PDT by Bahbah (Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: samantha

I see Ann Coulter criticized but have not heard anyone refute her facts nor the conclusions she draws. Unlike Carvile and what spews out of the Democrats.


584 posted on 09/03/2006 11:00:32 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Next in line for me is "Don't by another vote, I won't pay for a landslide." by Dr. Allen H. Loughery II. It's a history of corruption in my adopted state of WV. Believe me, it's a tome of biblical proportion! :)


585 posted on 09/03/2006 11:00:41 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
If it's not the oatmeal than what is it......
586 posted on 09/03/2006 11:01:18 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Sorry for the dalay. I've been watching MTP. Santorum did a good job and he addressed the only issue I have heard that seemed to be legitimate, his residency. Good for him. He showed Casey to be a lightweight of DNC talking points.

Sen. Biden is running... again?!?!?! One would think he's learn from his past failures. Guess not.


587 posted on 09/03/2006 11:02:54 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Doesn't look like the Armitage Plame Out is going to be discussed....

Free Scooter!

Just to refresh one's memory, do a simple Google search for: "Bush Plame Leak" (without the quotes) and you'll quickly re-discover just how full of anti-Bush hatred the DBM has been on this "issue." A FReeper with much better skills than I should prepare set of DBM quotes on the "Plamegate" affair--like the 'rats' statements on the obvious existence of WMDs in Iraq. Long gone are the days when the DBM can get away with shouting (in their best Roseanne Roseannadanna accents): "Never Mind."

588 posted on 09/03/2006 11:02:57 AM PDT by CDB ("They shall fall by the sword: they shall be a portion for foxes." from Psalm 63)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dave S; roses of sharon
On come on, are you that ignorant? Read the indictment.

Say Dave?

Are you really this legally ignorant? Do you REALLY just unthinkingly accept the indictment as proof? Considering how the prosecution of Rush and the Duke Rape case fell apart you MIGHT want to keep in mind an indictment is an accusation not a statement of fact.

Your statements of "FACT" may not be fact at all. A simple accusation is not proof of anything. All the Indictment is is a statement that the Grand Jury found reason for the Prosecutor to try the case. It merely the accusation made by the Prosecutor, NOT a statement of proof.

589 posted on 09/03/2006 11:03:08 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Democrats: Party of Sedition, Segregation and Slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
573--have you been tutoring MNJ or is it really the spiked oatmeal, he may burn up the FR server if he keeps it up.
590 posted on 09/03/2006 11:03:17 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: kabar

This is why I was careful to use conservative for my comment. The problem Republicans are rarely conservatives.


591 posted on 09/03/2006 11:04:58 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: samantha

Thanks, samantha.


592 posted on 09/03/2006 11:06:40 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
This is why I was careful to use conservative for my comment. The problem Republicans are rarely conservatives.

LOL. Nor are they as cynical.

593 posted on 09/03/2006 11:07:41 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Armitage and Powell letting the administration "twist in the wind" during the investigation and still remaining quiet now.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14533384/site/newsweek/page/2/

A barrel-chested Vietnam vet who had volunteered for combat, Armitage at times expressed disdain for Dick Cheney and other administration war hawks who had never served in the military. Armitage routinely returned from White House meetings shaking his head at the armchair warriors. "One day," says Powell's former chief of staff Larry Wilkerson, "we were walking into his office and Rich turned to me and said, 'Larry, these guys never heard a bullet go by their ears in anger ... None of them ever served. They're a bunch of jerks'."



More tellingly

http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=5986

Draw your own conclusions from the fact that Armitage’s best friend Colin Powell called Dick Cheney’s supporters (including Scooter Libby, Doug Feith and Paul Wolfowitz) the “Gestapo Office” (quite insulting considering that there is a history of relatives lost in the Holocaust among them).

Factor in that Powell called Doug Feith “a card-carrying member of the Likud Party” and referred to the Likudnicks in the White House controlling policy during his “exit interview with Bush” (see Assassin’s Gate: America in Iraq) – thereby showing his support for anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists.

Don’t forget that Powell is also joined at the hip with Brent Scowcroft – no friend of Israel and an investor in the Saudi-funded Carlyle Group? Consider that Armitage felt it was fine for Libby to undergo undeserved torment during Fitzgerald’s inquisition and that Colin Powell also knew that Armitage was the leaker but kept quiet about his knowledge when interviewed by the Justice two days after Amitage admitted to Powell he was the leaker.


594 posted on 09/03/2006 11:07:48 AM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Russert was NEVER required to testify to anyone under oath. He never appeared before the Grand Jury. The one issue that remains open is the Russert/Libby conversation. Seems that this may end up only as a bad memory thing, given the revelation of Woodward's. Libby may have confused Russer with Woodward.

The question is not whether a journalist told him anything, its how he conveniently FORGOT (?) all that he knew from information given him (his request) from the CIA and State department. Why Rove, Fleishcer and Libby's own notes show that he met numerous times to discuss what to do with the information that Wilson's wife who works at the CIA recommended him for the trip. He's got to explain how he could forget all that and then claim a reporter (pick one) told him about Wilson's wife working at the CIA for the first time the week before Novak's article. It's not a simple case of confusing Russert with Woodward. Besides Woodward got it from Powell.

595 posted on 09/03/2006 11:08:36 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Not me! MNJ is on a roll today, as you are. There have been some really great posts today. I feel sorry for whoever has to choose.


596 posted on 09/03/2006 11:09:10 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
LOL, its not ignorance of an indictment, its just one of the "class of 98" on FR trolling as Bushhaters.

You should have seen some of them on the Cheney threads after his hunting accident.

Saying the VP of the United States was drunk.

After those threads, I do see a consistent pattern.
597 posted on 09/03/2006 11:09:15 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Where do I file my guilty plea?


598 posted on 09/03/2006 11:10:25 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; AntiGuv; fieldmarshaldj; crasher; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican
Wow, that was some debate! Santorum was on fire - superb. He was dynamic, articulate, specific, knowledgeable, responsive to questions, and pithy. Casey was OK, but suffered from a relative lack of a knowledge base, and was mercilessly bitch slapped around by both Russert and Rick for not having any solution to the budget deficit other than to increase economic growth (he is probably in favor of motherhood too), and raise taxes (except that Casey wanted to cut the estate tax; the only problem with that is that Casey thought that would raise rather lose revenue; Rick pointed out that Casey had his number on the wrong side of the ledger, which was hilarious). But mostly Casey just suffered by comparison to Rick. It would be like me singing an operetta next to Placido Domingo. Russert did a superb job too.

I am more saddened now that Santorum is going to go down to defeat, than I was before watching the debate.

599 posted on 09/03/2006 11:10:37 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: federal
but IMO they were going down anyway

Most Military Historians would not agree with you. The Germans lost almost a million men in the West. Without that drain on their forces the Russians probably would of been held on the old Polish border and the Carpathian mountains.

Barbarossa, the great Soviet offensive that breaks open the East Front did NOT kick off until July 1944. With out the German forces being tied down in Italy, the Balkans and Normandy, it probably would not of succeeded. The Germans could not win the war, but they may have been able to drag it out to a negotiated settlement.

600 posted on 09/03/2006 11:10:57 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Democrats: Party of Sedition, Segregation and Slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 861-866 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson