Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions About Inquiry in C.I.A. Leak
The New York Times ^ | September 2, 2006 | By DAVID JOHNSTON

Posted on 09/01/2006 8:50:56 PM PDT by rightgrafix

WASHINGTON, Sept. 1 — An enduring mystery of the C.I.A. leak case has been solved in recent days, but with a new twist: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, knew the identity of the leaker from his very first day in the special counsel’s chair, but kept the inquiry open for nearly two more years before indicting I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, on obstruction charges.

Now, the question of whether Mr. Fitzgerald properly exercised his prosecutorial discretion in continuing to pursue possible wrongdoing in the case has become the subject of rich debate on editorial pages and in legal and political circles.

Richard L. Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state, first told the authorities in October 2003 that he had been the primary source for the July 14, 2003, column by Robert D. Novak that identified Valerie Wilson as a C.I.A. operative and set off the leak investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armitage; cialeak; deedeedee; dusmellslikepoo; enduringmysterynot; fitzmas; getabrainmorans; letthemeatyellowcake; libssuckeredagain; mediafinallygetsit; nytimes; nytreasontimes; patrickjfitzgerald; plame; plamegame; plamegate; richardlarmitage; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-194 next last
To: Miss Marple; Howlin

Get a load of Armitage's version via the NY Times.


61 posted on 09/01/2006 10:11:04 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Maybe the Daley machine set him up.

< };^)


62 posted on 09/01/2006 10:13:11 PM PDT by Erasmus (It takes branes to make an alternate universe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Maybe they have to role play to get any satisfaction.....him as a 'James Bond' type and her as 'Emma Peel'.


63 posted on 09/01/2006 10:13:48 PM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ashamedtobefromparkridge
While I am concerned that the Mayoralty may go to Jackson that is no certainty and Brown's entry into the race will complicate it. Daley could probably lose the RAT primary, run as an independent and win though.

I confess I don't understand how a prosecutor as shrewd as Fitzgerald good have allowed this to go on unless it is a cover for something more important.
64 posted on 09/01/2006 10:14:08 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Fitzgerald:

It was known that a CIA officer's identity was blown, it was known that there was a leak. We needed to figure out ....why.....

And, given that national security was at stake, it was especially important that we find out accurate facts.

Fitzgerald began his investigation accepting that Plame's identity was blown. He never doubted Wilson's (and the Left's) claims. He wanted to know why it happened (again accepting Wilson's premise that it was punitive) rather than proving it even did happen.

There was no national security at stake, and the fact is Fitzgerald already knew "who" leaked and was misleading the public when he said it was Libby.

This deserves much more attention than it is getting.

65 posted on 09/01/2006 10:14:32 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

And again we have the possibility of those stolen FBI files coming into play again.


66 posted on 09/01/2006 10:21:19 PM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

not only is it flying,
it's doing a barrel roll!


67 posted on 09/01/2006 10:24:10 PM PDT by BlueDragon (if wishes was fishes it would be a stinky world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rightgrafix

I think the republicans should have an investigation into Patrick Fitzgerald....I think he was paid off by the democratic party to keep this investigation open to see if he couldn't snar Vice President Cheney or President Bush into something...

FULL MONTE guys....total investigation for at least 2 years.....call all the dems in and have them testisfy before a grand jury....starting with William Jefferson and Hillary Rodham Clinton.....


68 posted on 09/01/2006 10:26:11 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

What exactly did Powell do or not do? And where did you get your information?


69 posted on 09/01/2006 10:28:41 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

He accepted the Lefty assertions that Plame was outed as revenge against Wilson, without questioning the validity.

I am genuinely shocked that Fitzgerald would make public comments about Libby being the first source of Plame's identity when he knew that was not the case.

His motives are suspect.


70 posted on 09/01/2006 10:29:14 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rightgrafix
Fitz is milking the system for a job(MONEY)...
As are MOST federal employees..
71 posted on 09/01/2006 10:31:38 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

btw:

Libby, Miller = June 2003

Armitage, Novak = July 2003


Novak's piece is what set it all in motion. It didn't begin with Miller. And for all we know, she was lying along with Russert and associates.


72 posted on 09/01/2006 10:38:38 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rightgrafix

Free Scooter Libby!!!


73 posted on 09/01/2006 10:40:09 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

I don't think so. Ten year old FBI files would not have much of value.


74 posted on 09/01/2006 10:41:15 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant

No argument about suspicion but it just makes no sense to me that he would have gone out on a limb like this for no good reason. He did not need Treason Media accolades. His work against the Machine here could have led to high office without this nonsense. The last such prosecutor went on to serve 5 terms as governor.


75 posted on 09/01/2006 10:43:35 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

I don't think so. Ten year old FBI files would not have much of value.



If you honestly believe that you need to try pulling your head out of the sand.


76 posted on 09/01/2006 10:55:36 PM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Mr. Fitzgerald’s decision to prolong the inquiry once he took over as special prosecutor in December 2003 had significant political and legal consequences. The inquiry seriously embarrassed and distracted the Bush White House for nearly two years -----

Fitzgerald ought to be behind bars for what he (and others) did to this country.

77 posted on 09/01/2006 10:56:06 PM PDT by beyond the sea (TWO PENCIL-NECKED DWEEBS NEED A PUBLIC HANGING— DAVID CORN, PARTICK FITZGERALD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Yesterday the Wash ComPost trashed Joe Wilson and Fitzgerald, and now the NYT's... Pigs are flying by my window

LOL

78 posted on 09/01/2006 10:56:53 PM PDT by beyond the sea (TWO PENCIL-NECKED DWEEBS NEED A PUBLIC HANGING— DAVID CORN, PARTICK FITZGERALD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=5986

"For more than three years, Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby have been accused, falsely, of being the source of the leak. Mr. Armitage, Mr. Powell, and Justice department officials knew the truth, but said nothing. Clarice Feldman, a Washington, D.C. lawyer, described Mr. Armitage's silence as "inexplicable and perfidious.""

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/08/plame_and_the_bush_lied_meme.html

"As most of us have long suspected, the man who told Novak about Valerie Plame was Richard Armitage, Colin Powell's deputy at the State Department and, with his boss, an assiduous underminer of the president's war policy. (His and Powell's—and George Tenet's—fingerprints are all over Bob Woodward's "insider" accounts of post-9/11 policy planning, which helps clear up another nonmystery: Woodward's revelation several months ago that he had known all along about the Wilson-Plame connection and considered it to be no big deal.)"

"Armitage identified himself to Colin Powell as Novak's source before the Fitzgerald inquiry had even been set on foot. The whole thing could—and should—have ended right there."

"But Powell and his aides feared the White House would then leak that Armitage had been Novak's source—possibly to embarrass State Department officials who had been unenthusiastic about Bush's Iraq policy. So Taft told Gonzales the bare minimum.."

http://www.slate.com/id/2148555/

"Powell, Armitage and Taft, the only three officials at the State Department who knew the story, never breathed a word of it publicly and Armitage's role remained secret."

"But Powell and his aides feared the White House would then leak that Armitage had been Novak's source—possibly to embarrass State Department officials who had been unenthusiastic about Bush's Iraq policy. So Taft told Gonzales the bare minimum:"

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14533384/site/newsweek


79 posted on 09/01/2006 10:57:18 PM PDT by DakotaRed (The legacy of the left, "Screw you, I got mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

And who is the source for this info? Reportedly, Powell told WH counsel Gonzalez (AG now) that he knew, but he was told to not tell the WH. That is the way things work. And the POTUS stayed protected.


80 posted on 09/01/2006 11:07:02 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson