Skip to comments.
Plan gains to publicly identify accused - Register Unconvicted Sex Offenders?
Toledo Blade ^
| Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Posted on 09/01/2006 11:13:40 AM PDT by Theophilus
No one in attendance voiced opposition to rules submitted by Attorney General Jim Petro's office to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, consisting of members of the Ohio House and Senate.
The committee's decision not to interfere with the rules puts Ohio in a position to become the first state to test a "civil registry."
(Excerpt) Read more at toledoblade.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: constitution; offender; registry; sex; sexoffenders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Fark Heading: In Ohio, you can now become a registered sex-offender without even being accused of any crime. Bonus: *anyone* can initiate the process. But at least the children are safe
To: Theophilus
This will never pass constitutional muster, no sweat.
I'm all for protecting children from pedophiles, but I prefer to execute them instead. Then you don't have to worry about registering the scum at all...
But they have to be convicted first, this is America not Cuba.
2
posted on
09/01/2006 11:18:59 AM PDT
by
wvobiwan
(BOYCOTT NYT, LAT, AP, Reuters, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, BBC, WaPo, Haaretz, and ALL leftist rags!!!)
To: Theophilus
In anything approaching a same world, that rule would be quickly dumped as blatantly Unconstitutional. However, I am afraid that this will be one more major erosion of rights "for the children."
3
posted on
09/01/2006 11:19:16 AM PDT
by
RebelBanker
(If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
To: Theophilus
Since anyone can initiate registration, it seems like you could spoof the system simply by registering every citizen in the state. Wonder if the geniuses that don't mind "sentence first, verdict afterwards" Alice-in-Wonderland style justice thought of that wrinkle.
4
posted on
09/01/2006 11:19:20 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: wvobiwan
"...but I prefer to execute them instead."
The pedophiles, not the children...:>D
5
posted on
09/01/2006 11:20:05 AM PDT
by
wvobiwan
(BOYCOTT NYT, LAT, AP, Reuters, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, BBC, WaPo, Haaretz, and ALL leftist rags!!!)
To: Theophilus
I have a problem with that. An accusation is not enough to force someone to register as a sex offender. People are wrongly accused, that is why we have a legal system. Innocent until proven guilty????? Anyone can initiate it?? No, no one will abuse that will they? Pissed off at someone? Accuse them of being a pedophile, that should do the trick. What country is this?
6
posted on
09/01/2006 11:23:29 AM PDT
by
MPJackal
("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
To: MPJackal
There's a simple defense to personally motivated accusations: register everyone you know. Pretty soon everyone in the state is on the list and it becomes meaningless.
7
posted on
09/01/2006 11:26:46 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: MPJackal
Innocent until proven guilty?????
Innocent until proven guilty hasn't existed in a long time, especially when it's he-said she-said.
8
posted on
09/01/2006 11:29:23 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: Theophilus
Sounds like a back door in stopping someone from getting a CCW ... figures RINO Petro's office would put out something like this.
9
posted on
09/01/2006 11:30:22 AM PDT
by
mr_hammer
(They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
To: MPJackal
People are wrongly accusedNot only that but some state's sex offenders aren't really what I would call sex offenders. In some states an 18 year old male can be convicted of a sex offense for having sex with his 16 year old girlfriend. Not that I condone the behavior but I hardly find that to be a case of a rabid sex offender unless forceable sex was involved.
10
posted on
09/01/2006 11:30:53 AM PDT
by
TXBubba
( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
To: Theophilus
This is absolute insanity.
11
posted on
09/01/2006 11:32:27 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: RebelBanker
Yah, and I want an "Abuse Of Power" registry on the same terms, and I know a good list of initial nominees.
12
posted on
09/01/2006 11:33:55 AM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Abortion = Child Sacrifice = Future Sacrifice)
To: MPJackal
"The rules spell out how the
untried process would work..."
Ironic use of words.
13
posted on
09/01/2006 11:37:56 AM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Abortion = Child Sacrifice = Future Sacrifice)
To: Theophilus
The will really help in divorce cases.
You either agree to "settle" or we will file for a protectvie order based on "information and belief".
Of course with wayback.com the acusation scars for life so you are 100% screwed.
14
posted on
09/01/2006 11:43:01 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
There's this guy in Chappiqua NY.
15
posted on
09/01/2006 11:44:21 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(massgopguy)
To: TXBubba
When I was in KC and I heard a radio show interviewing some guy. He was talking about how he was arrested and convicted if rape long ago. Turns out the victim was his 16 y/o girl friend. He was 18. The girls father reported him. Oh, I almost forgot...............they have been married for 50+ years now. Under this law he would have to register as a sex offender.
Can anyone say Scarlet Letter? Star of David?
16
posted on
09/01/2006 11:44:53 AM PDT
by
MPJackal
("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
To: wvobiwan
I'm all for protecting children from pedophiles, but I prefer to execute them instead.
You want to execute children??
17
posted on
09/01/2006 11:46:29 AM PDT
by
BaBaStooey
(I heart Emma Caulfield.)
To: wvobiwan
Oh, ok.
Nice to see you managed to spot your own grammatical gaffe.
18
posted on
09/01/2006 11:47:12 AM PDT
by
BaBaStooey
(I heart Emma Caulfield.)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Still Thinking
ever talk to a prosecutor?
They believe everyone is guilty. (guilty of something)
Prosecutors are generally: 1. looking to make a political name (citizens are expendable) 2. looking to make a legal name (citizens are still expendable) or 3. looking for a government job security (citizens are 100% expendable)
Constitutions and laws are what the judges say they are. They are not paid to care. (their words)
20
posted on
09/01/2006 11:49:55 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson