Skip to comments.
Unknown creature found by soldiers(Russia)-Cryptozoology
EnglishRussia ^
| Unknown
| EnglishRussia
Posted on 08/28/2006 10:23:33 AM PDT by Marius3188
This creature was found by Russian soldiers on Sakhalin shoreline. Sakhalin area is situated near to Japan, its the most eastern part of Russia, almost 5000 miles to East from Moscow (Russia is huge). People dont know who is it. According to the bones and teeth - it is not a fish. According to its skeleton - its not a crocodile or alligator. It has a skin with hair or fur. It has been said that it was taken by Russian special services for in-depth studies, and we are lucky that people who encountered it first made those photos before it was brought away.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Russia; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: animal; beluga; creature; crypto; cryptobiology; cryptozoology; fringe; hoax; itsadog; mystery; ohsomysteriouso; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-169 next last
To: Mark Felton
Resemblance to a seal
61
posted on
08/28/2006 10:43:21 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: Marius3188
The teeth would seem to be of a grass/vegetable eater, rather than a meat eater (carnivor).
62
posted on
08/28/2006 10:43:27 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: 7thson
Aw man, you beat me to it!Great minds!
63
posted on
08/28/2006 10:43:48 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Smedley
Looks like a Skexie to me too!!!
64
posted on
08/28/2006 10:43:59 AM PDT
by
KeepUSfree
(WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
To: NavyCanDo
Never mind, I just looked at the photos. Just shot down my hopes on it being a Mermaid. It's the mermaid that Muslim mermen get - 72 of 'em. Humans get Helen Thomas.
65
posted on
08/28/2006 10:43:59 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
To: Marius3188
66
posted on
08/28/2006 10:44:05 AM PDT
by
DBrow
To: Marius3188
67
posted on
08/28/2006 10:44:28 AM PDT
by
Oratam
To: elfman2
68
posted on
08/28/2006 10:45:18 AM PDT
by
Conan the Librarian
(The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
To: DBrow
69
posted on
08/28/2006 10:45:27 AM PDT
by
Marius3188
(Happy Resurrection Weekend)
To: Publius
"We're both looking for the blowhole."
Looks like the skin was pushed off the top of the mandible, up onto the head. I think I can see eye sockets in one photo, about 2/3 of the way back.
This is an obvious air-breather, but the lack of nostrils would seem to indicate a blow hole of some kind. Gosh I wish I could go there and have a look at this thing in person.
With luck, it won't just disappear into some warehouse somewhere without being thoroughly examined. It does not have the look of a fake.
70
posted on
08/28/2006 10:45:28 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: Smedley
I agree - critter from Dark Crystal :)
To: Marius3188
The animal is a juvenile toothed whale. It's hard to tell the exact species because of it's advanced decay, but there is little doubt in my mind that the photo is of the near-skeletal remains of a juvenile toothed whale, several species of which are natural to that area.
Many people aren't aware of this, but the heads of many toothed whale species are primarily muscle and fat. In an orca, for example, two thirds of the "head" is actually some sort of meat. Unless you do marine biology for a living, it's unlikely that anyone here would identify an orca skull as such. I really doubt that the skull in that photo is orca because the teeth are wrong, but there are a half dozen other possibilities in the world.
For comparison:
To: BigTex5
Ye Gads, it's my ex-wife!!!
73
posted on
08/28/2006 10:46:01 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: Marius3188
"People dont know who is it. "hugh series and hugh.
74
posted on
08/28/2006 10:46:59 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: Publius
How about those ventral ridges on the spine, clear to the end of the tail. That's typical of mososaurs and other similar fossils. It's very atypical of any modern animals I'm aware of.
75
posted on
08/28/2006 10:47:23 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: Lady Jag
However, the body lacks ambulocetus' legs. (Maybe they rotted away.) It looks like a descendant of ambulocetus that took a more streamlined shape, much like the earliest whales.
76
posted on
08/28/2006 10:47:41 AM PDT
by
Publius
To: SirJohnBarleycorn
It died from second hand smoke. LOL
77
posted on
08/28/2006 10:48:12 AM PDT
by
fish hawk
(Terror : in a cave in Afghanistan. Treason: in a cave-in , in the Democratic Party)
To: Arthalion
"in the world." should have read "in that part of the world."
To: Marius3188
79
posted on
08/28/2006 10:49:37 AM PDT
by
MarkeyD
(The tree of liberty must from time to time be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
To: Arthalion
It's certainly possible that it's a modern whale of some sort. The big problem is all that skin covering things up. Are there legs anywhere on this thing? I cannot tell.
80
posted on
08/28/2006 10:49:56 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson