Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cannabis should be decriminalized for the same reasons that alcohol is
The Prometheus Institute ^ | 8/28/2006 | Editorial

Posted on 08/28/2006 7:29:35 AM PDT by tang0r

It turns out that alcohol is legal for the simplest, most nostalgic, and most American reason of all. Despite its risks and harmful side-effects, adults are reserved right to drink because they are independent adults in a free country. For all of the empty rhetoric about economics and black markets, the end of Prohibition was due to a single principle: even if drinking may be bad for society, government has no right to keep the people from doing it. The ability to get drunk is an inalienable right that we have forever confirmed with the 18th Amendment.

(Excerpt) Read more at prometheusinstitute.net ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: anotherleroylie; bongbrigade; cannibus; cocainekilledbelushi; decriminalization; donutwatch; drugskilledbelushi; govwatch; leroywasaspammer; libertarian; libertarians; mrleroybait; prohibition; relaxandsmokethis; taxlegalweed; warondrugs; weed; wod; woddiecrushonleroy; wodlist; ydotheycallitdope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 421-423 next last
To: Ouderkirk
Yep, I'm a great big socialist, statist, fascist, Nazi, Christian fanatic who wants to impose my completely narrow world view on all of you enlightened libertarians.

Persecution complex?

281 posted on 08/29/2006 2:32:07 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
there is no "right to privacy" in the constitution

Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

282 posted on 08/29/2006 2:37:18 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: delphirogatio
So basically this person admits that they have insufficient data to arrive at a conclusive determination...and then proceeds to do so.

If by "conclusive determination" you mean "absolute proof", then you are right. That is not available and never will be, but that's okay, because that is not the way that science works. There isn't absolute proof of gravity either, but I still believe it exists. What we do know is that after crunching the numbers, the researcher found that "the theory which is most consistent with the data is that changes in the homicide rate are responses to changes in substance control policy."

But you don't have to take his word for it. Here's another:

Violence and the U.S. Prohibitions of Drugs and Alcohol(pdf)

This paper examines the relation between prohibitions and violence using the historical behavior of the homicide rate in the United States. The results document that increases in enforcement of drug and alcohol prohibition have been associated with increases in the homicide rate, and auxilliary evidence suggests this positive correlation reflects a causal effect of prohibition enforcement on homicide. Controlling for other potential determinants of the homicide rate - the age composition of the population, the incarceration rate, economic conditions, gun availability, and the death penalty - does not alter the conclusion that drug and alcohol prohibition have substantially raised the homicide rate in the United States over much of the past 100 years.

Nevertheless, my comment stands...we hear very frequently about people on drugs committing crimes.

Actually it was a question, not a statement. And no one denies that people on drugs often commit crimes. The question is why. One probable reason is that people who use illegal drugs are already people more inclined to commit crimes, drugs or not. Another is that under prohibition, drugs are prohibitiively expensive, meaning that people have to commit crimes in order to buy those drugs that they would otherwise be able get honestly.

They then go on to say that, but for their drug habit, they wouldn't be committing the crimes.

Don't be so gullible.

How manty treatment professionals have you heard of advocating legalization as a way to help?

Treatment professionals? What do treatment professionals have to do with it? Their expertise is getting addicts clean, not crime prevention.

283 posted on 08/29/2006 3:19:50 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Persecution complex?

no, just annoyed with this legalize crapola. By the reasoning used in this thread let's legalize prostitution, and polygamy, and lower the age of consent to 4 years old, and any other thing that is presently illegal. No rules, no propriety, no ethics. Yep a great place to be....NOT

284 posted on 08/29/2006 3:24:47 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
Ha!

I was noticing some of the usual Tobacco Taliban suspects here, too.

We're natural allies in the fight against the Nanny State, but a few of them persist in seeing cigarette smokers as the reincarnation of Harry Anslinger, for some reason. I could never figure it out.

In all fairness, marijuana users have been putting up with demonization a lot longer than cigarette smokers have, so I guess they're a little further along in the March to the Gulag ;-)

I've smoked marijuana more than once in my salad days, and have always been against the WOSD, from the very beginning.

Never seen a brawl break out because a bunch of people were smoking pot, nor because a bunch of people were sitting around smoking cigarettes.

There's a small segment in both camps who seem to want to get into a morality pissing contest.

And both camps have been the victims of junk science.

The larger argument should be against the Nanny State, period.

285 posted on 08/29/2006 4:58:05 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
By the reasoning used in this thread let's legalize prostitution, and polygamy, and lower the age of consent to 4 years old, and any other thing that is presently illegal. No rules, no propriety, no ethics.

Nonsense. Read a book on elementary logic.

286 posted on 08/29/2006 5:33:41 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
The larger argument should be against the Nanny State, period.

You are so right!

287 posted on 08/29/2006 8:57:34 PM PDT by beckysueb (KOmmies are really nothing but DUmmies with better PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
Drugs have been illegal for all of my 45 years on earth

The welfare state has been legal for all of your 45 years on earth ... does that make it a good idea?

and quite frankly all of your arguments to legalize them are specious at best.

So let's see the better arguments that prove your claim.

You don't seem to think that there are any negative consequences for making drugs legal. It's all going to be just a happy place and we can all sing kumbaya.

Straw man. The argument here is that criminalizing drugs does more harm than legalizing them would ... as we learned with the deadly addictive violence-inducing drug alcohol back before your years on earth began.

288 posted on 08/30/2006 5:51:26 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: winston2
(Mike) had told me that his brother was a schizophrenic. He also told me that if we smoked some weed late in the clean up project, that Owen would be better - mentally.

And you believed Mikey didn't you. heh. heh-heh. he-he-he...

289 posted on 08/30/2006 6:27:45 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
Still trying to sell that P.O.S.

What do you expect...Jake seeing the light.

290 posted on 08/30/2006 7:51:58 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
(Mike) had told me that his brother was a schizophrenic. He also told me that if we smoked some weed late in the clean up project, that Owen would be better - mentally.(winston2)

And you believed Mikey didn't you. heh. heh-heh. he-he-he...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply: Yeah - I did believe Mike.

We've been friends for a couple of decades. Mike had just finished sheet rocking my workshop~'deluxe'(that's what the clean-up was - mud and scrap pieces of sheet rock) and is an all-around great guy. Everything turned out just great!

"After about 3/4 of the work was done, I pulled out a couple of joints and we too a smoke break. Owen was really enjoying the time. He got real philosophical and conversation was flowing freely. He said he would like to visit again sometime. Owen went back to doing the work and cheerfully finished. I told Mike how it went and he just smiled. You gotta love anyone who helps your sick brother."(winston2 post #251)

In your line of work - have you ever considered cannabis as useful for those with troubled minds?

291 posted on 08/31/2006 3:17:30 AM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Yes...It's the first 'enviro' movie and so overacted it's funny, but a classic!

"You know, if I had the money, I would smoke two... three of these every day." - Detective Thorn

292 posted on 08/31/2006 5:34:59 PM PDT by monkfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: monkfan

Lol!


293 posted on 08/31/2006 5:49:22 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: winston2
cannabis as useful for those with troubled minds?

"Current research indicates that marijuana may actually protect brain cells."
National Institute of Mental Health, 1998
.
294 posted on 08/31/2006 5:53:11 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

Why bother legalizing it? Since it's smoke, you won't be able to smoke it hardly anywhere anymore.


295 posted on 08/31/2006 6:00:22 PM PDT by DakotaRed (The legacy of the left, "Screw you, I got mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r
These threads are almost as boring as my 50 year old pot head friends.
296 posted on 08/31/2006 6:02:24 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

297 posted on 08/31/2006 6:42:02 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
cannabis as useful for those with troubled minds?(winston2)

"Current research indicates that marijuana may actually protect brain cells."
National Institute of Mental Health, 1998

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Come to think of it -

none of my cannabis smokin friends have become mentally ill. (I ain't making this up either.)

298 posted on 08/31/2006 6:42:53 PM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: winston2

They live longer healthier lives too.


299 posted on 08/31/2006 6:45:40 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
These threads are almost as boring as my 50 year old pot head friends.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OK - you guessed my age - but I ain't boring - yet.

BTW - Are you for joints or against them?

300 posted on 08/31/2006 6:45:45 PM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 421-423 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson