Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plane Crashes in Lexington
WTVQ 36 Lexington ^ | August 27, 2006 | Jon Sasser

Posted on 08/27/2006 4:38:10 AM PDT by BigBlueJon

Edited on 08/27/2006 5:02:21 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Possible plane crash in Lexington, KY. My brother works security for Lexington UK Hospital and was just called in. No news locally or on major news outlets yet. I didn't want to post anything for fear of being wrong, but he's still waiting for an official call while on stand-by.

Update from WTVQ 36 Lexington:

A plane has crashed near the Blue Grass Airport this morning. No word on details at this time. We are told it was a commercial aircraft. Versailles Road is blocked as emergency vehicles circle around the site. We have live coverage beginning at 7:20am. Stay with Action News 36 for more details.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: airplane; bluegrassairport; comair; crash; delta; dl5191; kentucky; lex; lexington; plane; planecrash; terribletragedy; wreck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 941-958 next last
To: BluH2o

Thank you for the clarification. I looked it up after I did the post and realized I was indeed wrong!


821 posted on 08/28/2006 4:02:17 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 814 | View Replies]

To: OBXWanderer

WLW radio in Cincy had something to say about that but I did not catch it


822 posted on 08/28/2006 4:08:51 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: toldyou
I've heard a few commercial pilots say upon landing...."Thanks for flying with us. You're now about to start the most dangerous part of your journey when you get into your automobiles, so please drive safely."

One of the "cutest" statements I ever heard over the IC from a pilot was on a flight I made from Raleigh to Atlanta. (Airtran) They loaded us up, then unloaded us back into the terminal, due to a weatherhold for some bad stuff at ATL. During this hour or so in the terminal, the Captain and FO came out and spent some time at the ticket desk on the captain's laptop. I think they were looking at weather. Anyway, the Captain looked like he had definetely "paid his dues", you know, the 20000 or more hour type, probably he was even ex-Eastern. The FO looked like a pimple face kid right out of high school. I think the Captain heard some murmurs about how young the FO looked. Also this flight was just a few days after the JFK JR. crash, where there was some question of experience. After reboarding the AC, the captain came on the IC, said some words about how long to ATL, etc. then he said, "Folks, there has been a lot of talk this past week about flight experience, and I just want you to know that up here in this cockpit we have over 41 years of combined experience, and I have 40 of 'em. Enjoy your flight."

823 posted on 08/28/2006 4:12:19 AM PDT by OBXWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex

I went to NACO, the FAA National Aeronautical Charting Office, and the airport diagram that they've got for KLEX shows a different taxiway layout. They don't have the taxiway in the picture that you've got labeled as A4; all they have is that looping connector between 22 and 26 (taxiway A7). The chart says it's good "03 AUG 2006 through 31 AUG 2006)". If you compare it to your picture, it's easy to see how a pilot could get confused...although that's no excuse for this type of mistake being made.

FAA chart available here for comparison to the picture:
http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0608/00697AD.PDF

}:-)4


824 posted on 08/28/2006 4:54:22 AM PDT by Moose4 (Dirka dirka Mohammed jihad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 798 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

I would not like to be stopped at that traffic light at the end of the runway!


825 posted on 08/28/2006 5:34:04 AM PDT by Sender (“Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
CRASH KILLS 49
'We are families and friends of the victims'
By Amy Wilson
HERALD-LEADER STAFF WRITER
Comair 5191 never made it much beyond the moist green earth from which it had broken free.

An hour before sunrise in clearing weather, the airplane with 50 souls aboard ran out of runway. The Atlanta-bound plane lasted less than a minute aloft before falling a mile west of the airport, casting 50,000 pounds of debris and jet fuel about as it all burned mercilessly to a halt.

Forty-nine people on board were killed.

Immediately, the early-morning quiet enveloping Blue Grass Airport was no more.

Around 6:15 a.m., local hospitals were told to gather their staffs and to be ready for multiple trauma victims. Versailles Road became an emergency staging ground. Three police officers pulled a single man, the plane's first officer, barely alive, from the plane.

And the realization hit that Nick Bentley's farm had become both a crash site and sacred ground.

Full article.

826 posted on 08/28/2006 5:35:04 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Here is a pic of an airliner using the "shortcut" between the runways.


827 posted on 08/28/2006 5:42:05 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: OBXWanderer

"Folks, there has been a lot of talk this past week about flight experience, and I just want you to know that up here in this cockpit we have over 41 years of combined experience, and I have 40 of 'em. Enjoy your flight."

Now that's funny!

Yep, I remember a first officer who looked so young that when I took their meals up to the cockpit, I included a bowl of milk "for the puppy!" :)


828 posted on 08/28/2006 5:43:45 AM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

Interesting comment from an AOL message board from an air traffic controller with over 30 years experience, currently employed at one of the nation's busiest airports:

"For several years now the air traffic controllers, that work the system from the front lines every day, have told the FAA and Administrator Blakey that a system called ASDE-X is a necessary component to safe operations of ground traffic in the air traffic control towers. This system allows the controller to see and track via radar, all aircraft and vehicle movement on the airport surface area. It allows the controller to see if an aircraft is entering a area where it should not be such a crossing an active runway or taking a taxi route to the wrong runway. This system is especially helpful to the controller during times of bad weather or night time operations when normal visibility is restricted. This may have been the case in Lexington where reports state that the pilot, in the early morning darkness, may have taxied to the wrong runway. Most of the 35 busiest airports do not have this equipment. Those that have been scheduled such as my location are on waiting lists that stretch for several years from now. The FAA Administrators rule is if the airport has had several ground errors during a specific time period they will be more likely to receive the equipment rather than those with a safer operating record."

More info about the ASDE-X:
http://www.sensis.com/docs/128/


829 posted on 08/28/2006 5:46:54 AM PDT by Shugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Unless you are an air traffic controller employed by the FAA (and I am), I don't think you realize exactly what the pilot/ATC relationship is all about. You make it sound like we are not held accountable for our actions. I can assure you that if I instruct a pilot to "fly into a mountain" (or any other incorrect instruction), and the pilot does execute that instruction and crashes... I will be held FULLY accountable for it, and the FAA will be liable for millions of dollars worth of litigation.

A pilot/controller relationship is NOTHING like a doctor/nurse relationship. ATC is there to insure the safety of the aircraft under our control, and we tell the pilots where to go and what to do in order to insure that safety. Yes, the pilot-in-command does NOT have to comply with our instructions, but if he/she doesn't, they are on their own --- and will have to answer for any reprocussions that may arise from not following our commands.
830 posted on 08/28/2006 6:01:14 AM PDT by Painful (Air Traffic Controller specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies]

To: Painful
Thank you for joining the thread and welcome to Free Republic. There is an Aviation ping list somewhere on here.

We do like to speculate here and the great thing is when pros like you chime in with facts. In your experience, how often to pilots make errors on the ground - make wrong turns, etc?

831 posted on 08/28/2006 6:25:34 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: BigBlueJon

And the morons at the EMMY's opened with a plane crash skit. I turned the whole thing off.


832 posted on 08/28/2006 6:37:43 AM PDT by veronica (NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OBXWanderer
Have WLW from Cincinnati on XM radio and the guest (Ratliff - expert) is confirming that there is still confusion over whether there was a pilot in the cockpit jumpseat. Some people thinking that a third pilot may have been a distraction.

He is stating that the info the NTSB gave last evening at the presser was unusual. That they usually would not reveal that indeed the plane was cleared for the long runway and took off from the short one.

833 posted on 08/28/2006 6:46:48 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

My prayers are with you and the families of the victims. So sad! :-(


834 posted on 08/28/2006 6:52:59 AM PDT by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Presser with NTSB at noon per FN


835 posted on 08/28/2006 7:05:03 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Thanks for the welcome Don-O, and I can understand why everyone wants to speculate. Aviation accidents highly fascinate me as well, especially considering my line of work as an ATCer.

I wouldn't want to speculate too much into this LEX accident, as there are just so many variables to consider. I have no doubt that the NTSB will find out exactly what happened here, as they will examine it from every angle. But to answer your question about pilots making errors on the ground... it does happen every once in a blue moon, but it is very rare... especially for a commercial pilot. Usually the ones you have to be on the lookout for are the general aviation pilots, not the commercial pilots who fly for a living. In fact, THIS in itself could be a contributing factor as to why the ATCer in the tower at LEX did not catch this in time. You see, us Controllers expect someone who flies for a living to be "on the ball" or "on top of his/her game." However, looking at the LEX airport layout and runway configuration, its very understandable how this mistake could happen... especially early in the morning... in darkness. One would think the controllers at LEX have had this type of thing happen before on more than one occasion, and would be on the lookout for it. But it only takes not paying attention just once for something like this to happen. Sad but true.

I would be interested in knowing exactly where their Control Tower is located on the airport, and what kind of view the tower controller has of that takeoff point... and what he or she was doing at the time the aircraft started rolling down the wrong runway. This point on the airport may not be easily visible, as all towers are not located right in the middle of an airport (like they probably should be). I'd also be very interested in knowing what the Tower Controller was doing at the time the aircraft started takeoff clearance. Its fairly obvious he/she wasn't doing his/her job correctly, because they should've caught this... and I have no doubt will share in the responsibility of this accident happening. I have no doubt there was only one controller on duty in the tower, as smaller facilities like LEX are minimally staffed at that hour. I don't think that's smart for the FAA to allow that, as 2 eyes are always better than 1. But nobody ever said the FAA was smart.
836 posted on 08/28/2006 7:14:08 AM PDT by Painful (Air Traffic Controller specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

"They don't have the taxiway in the picture that you've got labeled as A4; all they have is that looping connector between 22 and 26 (taxiway A7)."

Yeah, you're right.  If you look at the previous month's chart, you can see it labeled as A5 (I messed up the labeling of A4 and A5 because the two charts changed and it was very confusing).  Here's both charts, side by side:

FAA CHART  -  JULY

FAA CHART  -  AUGUST

FAA CHART  -  JULY

FAA CHART  -  AUGUST

It appears that the August chart has renumbered the taxi-ways and what was A5 in July was changed to A7 in August chart.  They show the new configuration, but don't show the closed off section at all on the August chart (pink on my modified picture).   OTOH, it could be argued that it looks like they removed A5 and that A7 is actually the closed off portion.  As I said, very confusing.

IMHO, this is an FAA major fubar.  However, it's still the pilot's responsibility to verify - he's in charge.

So sad.  Prayers for victims and their families.

837 posted on 08/28/2006 7:40:53 AM PDT by RebelTex (Help cure diseases: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1548372/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: don-o
He is stating that the info the NTSB gave last evening at the presser was unusual. That they usually would not reveal that indeed the plane was cleared for the long runway and took off from the short one.

In this case, as far as the runway actually used, it would make them appear completely bureaucratic and secretive given the obvious marks on the ground, the damaged fence at the end of the runway and the slide marks in the ground. They were just stating the obvious. As far as confirming the clearance given, withholding that would also be seen as not being forthcoming. However, saying anything beyond that would be speculative and rightfully should be withheld for now.

838 posted on 08/28/2006 7:41:06 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex

On the old chart, looks like the pilot would have taxied on A, across 26, and continuing on A to 22.

On the new chart, he would have taxied on A to 26, then on A-7 to 22.

If he was thinking in the mode of "Go to the end of A", that would have put him on 22 on the old chart, and 26 on the new. May have seen the "A-7" and thought "that's not me".

Harly a valid excuse, but may go towards why this error occurred.


839 posted on 08/28/2006 7:51:44 AM PDT by Toskrin (It didn't seem nostalgic when I was doing it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: Toskrin

Agreed.


840 posted on 08/28/2006 7:57:48 AM PDT by RebelTex (Help cure diseases: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1548372/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 941-958 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson